Skip to main content

Investigating the Phytohormone Ethylene Response Pathway by Chemical Genetics

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Plant Chemical Genomics

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1056))

  • 2437 Accesses

Abstract

Conventional mutant screening in forward genetics research is indispensible to understand the biological operation behind any given phenotype. However, several issues, such as functional redundancy and lethality or sterility resulting from null mutations, frequently impede the functional characterization of genetic mutants. As an alternative approach, chemical screening with natural products or synthetic small molecules that act as conditional mutagens allows for identifying bioactive compounds as bioprobes to overcome the above-mentioned issues. Ethylene is the simplest olefin and is one of the major phytohormones playing crucial roles in plant physiology. Most of the current information on how ethylene works in plants came primarily from genetic studies of ethylene mutants identified by conventional genetic screening two decades ago. However, we lack a complete picture of functional interaction among components in the ethylene pathway and cross talk of ethylene with other phytohormones. Here, we describe our methodology for using chemical genetics to identify small molecules that interfere with the ethylene response. We set up a phenotype-based screening platform and a reporter gene-based system for verification of the hit compounds identified by chemical screening. We have successfully identified small molecules affecting the ethylene phenotype in etiolated seedlings and showed that a group of structurally similar compounds are novel inhibitors of ACC synthase, a rate-limiting enzyme in the ethylene biosynthesis pathway.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cong F, Cheung AK, Huang SM (2012) Chemical genetics-based target identification in drug discovery. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 52:57–78

    Google Scholar 

  2. Knight ZA, Garrison JL, Chan K, King DS, Shokat KM (2007) A remodelled protease that cleaves phosphotyrosine substrates. J Am Chem Soc 129:11672–11673

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Connor CJ, Laraia L, Spring DR (2011) Chemical genetics. Chem Soc Rev 40:4332–4345

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stockwell BR (2000) Frontiers in chemical genetics. Trends Biotechnol 18:449–455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McCourt P, Desveaux D (2010) Plant chemical genetics. New Phytol 185:15–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Osawa Y, Lau M, Lowe ER (2007) Plant-derived small molecule inhibitors of Neuronal NO-Synthase: Potential effects on protein degradation. Plant Signal Behav 2:129–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Blackwell HE, Zhao Y (2003) Chemical genetic approaches to plant biology. Plant Physiol 133:448–455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Grozinger CM, Chao ED, Blackwell HE, Moazed D, Schreiber SL (2001) Identification of a class of small molecule inhibitors of the sirtuin family of NAD-dependent deacetylases by phenotypic screening. J Biol Chem 276:38837–38843

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao Y, Dai X, Blackwell HE, Schreiber SL, Chory J (2003) SIR1, an upstream component in auxin signaling identified by chemical genetics. Science 301:1107–1110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hayashi K, Jones AM, Ogino K, Yamazoe A, Oono Y, Inoguchi M, Kondo H, Nozaki H, Yokonolide B (2003) A novel inhibitor of auxin action, blocks degradation of AUX/IAA factors. J Biol Chem 278:23797–23806

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Armstrong JI, Yuan S, Dale JM, Tanner VN, Theologis A (2004) Identification of inhibitors of auxin transcriptional activation by means of chemical genetics in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:14978–14983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Christian M, Hannah WB, Lüthen H, Jones AM (2008) Identification of auxins by a chemical genomics approach. J Exp Bot 59:2757–2767

    Google Scholar 

  13. Savaldi-Goldstein S, Baiga TJ, Pojer F, Dabi T, Butterfield C, Parry G, Santner A, Dharmasiri N, Tao Y, Estelle M, Noel JP, Chory J (2008) New auxin analogs with growth-promoting effects in intact plants reveal a chemical strategy to improve hormone delivery. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:15190–15195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gendron JM, Haque A, Gendron N, Chang T, Asami T, Wang ZY (2008) Chemical genetic dissection of brassinosteroid-ethylene interaction. Mol Plant 1:368–379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Park SY, Fung P, Nishimura N, Jensen DR, Fujii H, Zhao Y, Lumba S, Santiago J, Rodrigues A, Chow TF, Alfred SE, Bonetta D, Finkelstein R, Provart NJ, Desveaux D, Rodriguez PL, McCourt P, Zhu JK, Schroeder JI, Volkman BF, Cutler SR (2009) Abscisic acid inhibits type 2C protein phosphatases via the PYR/PYL family of START proteins. Science 324:1068–1071

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nishimura N, Hitomi K, Arvai AS, Rambo RP, Hitomi C, Cutler SR, Schroeder JI, Getzoff ED (2009) Structural mechanism of abscisic acid binding and signaling by dimeric PYR1. Science 326:1373–1379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Peterson FC, Burgie ES, Park SY, Jensen DR, Weiner JJ, Bingman CA, Chang CE, Cutler SR, Phillips GN Jr, Volkman BF (2010) Structural basis for selective activation of ABA receptors. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17:1109–1113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hua J, Sakai H, Nourizadeh S, Chen QG, Bleecker AB, Ecker JR, Meyerowitz EM (1998) EIN4 and ERS2 are members of the putative ethylene receptor gene family in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 10:1321–1332

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stepanova AN, Alonso JM (2009) Ethylene signaling and response: Where different regulatory modules meet. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12:548–555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Alonso JM, Stepanova AN, Solano R, Wisman E, Ferrari S, Ausubel FM, Ecker JR (2003) Five components of the ethylene-response pathway identified in a screen for weak ethylene-insensitive mutants in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:2992–2997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Larsen PB, Chang C (2001) The Arabidopsis eer1 mutant has enhanced ethylene responses in the hypocotyl and stem. Plant Physiol 125:1061–1073

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lin LC, Hsu JH, Wang LC (2010) Identification of novel inhibitors of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase by chemical screening in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Biol Chem 285:33445–33456

    Google Scholar 

  23. Guzmán P, Ecker JR (1990) Exploiting the triple response of Arabidopsis to identify ethylene-related mutants. Plant Cell 2:513–523

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lizada MC, Yang SF (1979) A simple and sensitive assay for 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid. Anal Biochem 100:140–145

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yamagami T, Tsuchisaka A, Yamada K, Haddon WF, Harden LA, Theologis A (2003) Biochemical diversity among the 1-amino-cyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase isozymes encoded by the Arabidopsis gene family. J Biol Chem 278:49102–49112

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chang S, Puryear J, Cairney J (1993) A simple and efficient method for isolating RNA from pine trees. Plant Mol Biol 11:693–699

    Google Scholar 

  27. Veen H (1983) Silver thiosulphate: An experimental tool in plant science. Sci Hortic 20: 211–214

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from National Science Council (NSC972311B001003) and Development Program of Industrialization for Agricultural Biotechnology (99S0030088 and 100S0030016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media, New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Lin, LC., Chueh, CM., Wang, LC. (2014). Investigating the Phytohormone Ethylene Response Pathway by Chemical Genetics. In: Hicks, G., Robert, S. (eds) Plant Chemical Genomics. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1056. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-592-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-592-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-591-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-592-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics