Skip to main content

Chromosomal Aberration Test in Human Lymphocytes

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Genotoxicity Assessment

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1044))

Abstract

Human peripheral lymphocytes (HPL) are non-cycling primary cells (G0 cells). They are easily collectable by venipuncture. In the presence of suitable culture media and stimulants in vitro HPL enter the cell cycle and divide mitotically. Metaphase-like stages can be arrested using the spindle fiber poison colcemid and prepared on microscopic slides. Following appropriate staining, chromosomal aberrations can be analyzed in the microscope. These aberrations may be induced either in vivo by environmental or occupational influences or in vitro after experimentally controlled manipulations in order to detect or to test the mutagenic potency of various agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J et al (2008) Molecular biology of the cell, 5th edn. Garland, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Murphy K (2012) Janeway’s immunobiology. Garland Science, Taylor & Francis Group, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Trepel F (1975) Kinetik lymphatischer Zellen. In: Theml H, Begemann E (eds) Lymphocyt und klinische Immunologie. Springer, Berlin, pp 16–26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Ling NR, Kay JE (1975) Lymphocyte stimulation. North-Holland

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bessis M (1973) Living blood cells and their ultrastructure. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  6. Petrzilka GE, Schroeder HE (1979) Activation of human T–lymphocytes, a kinetic study. Cell Tissue Res 201:101–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Obe G, Beek B (1982) The human leukocyte system. In: de Serres FJ, Hollaender A (eds) Chemical mutagens, principles and methods for their detection, vol 7. Plenum Press, New York, pp 337–400

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Loeb LA, Ewald JL, Agarwal SS (1970) DNA polymerase and DNA replication during lymphocyte transformation. Cancer Res 30:2514–2520

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dudin G, Beek B, Obe G (1974) The human leukocyte test system I. DNA synthesis and mitoses in PHA-stimulated 2-day cultures. Mutat Res 23:279–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Beek B, Obe G (1975) The human leukocyte test system IV. The RNA-synthesis pattern in the first G1-phase of the cell cycle after stimulation with PHA. Mutat Res 29:165–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Obe G, Beek B, Dudin G (1975) The human leukocyte test system V. DNA synthesis and mitoses in PHA-stimulated 3-day cultures. Humangenetik 28:295–302

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dudin G, Beek B, Obe G (1976) The human lymphocyte test system VIII. DNA synthesis and mitoses in 3-day cultures stimulated with pokeweed mitogen. Hum Genet 32:323–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Obe G, Brandt K, Beek B (1976) The human leukocyte test system IX. DNA synthesis and mitoses in PHA-stimulated 2-day cultures set up with Eagle’s minimal essential medium (MEM). Hum Genet 33:263–268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Beek B, Obe G (1979) Sister chromatid exchanges in human leukocyte chromosomes: spontaneous and induced frequencies in early- and late-proliferating cells in vitro. Hum Genet 49:51–61

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chudoba I (2007) Fluorescence in situ hybridization. In: Obe G, Vijayalaxmi (eds) Chromosomal alterations: methods, results and importance in human health. Springer, Berlin, pp 285–299

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Johannes C, Horstmann M, Durante M et al (2004) Chromosome intrachanges and interchanges detected by multicolor banding in lymphocytes: searching for clastogen signatures in the human genome. Radiat Res 161: 540–548

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Johannes C, Chudoba I, Obe G (1999) Analysis of X–ray induced aberrations in human chromosome 5 using high resolution multi-colour banding FISH (mBAND). Chromosome Res 7:625–633

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Obe G, Pfeiffer P, Savage JRK et al (2002) Chromosomal aberrations: formation, identification and distribution. Mutat Res 504:17–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Savage JRK, Papworth DG (1991) Excogitations about the quantification of structural chromosomal aberrations. In: Obe G (ed) Advances in mutagenesis research. Springer, Berlin, pp 162–189

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Müller WU (2007) Comet assay. In: Obe G, Vijayalaxmi (eds) Chromosomal alterations: methods, results and importance in human health. Springer, Berlin, pp 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fenech M (2007) Cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay: a comprehensive “cytome” approach for measuring chromosomal instability, mitotic dysfunction and cell death simultaneously in one assay. In: Obe G, Vijayaylaxmi (eds) Chromosomal alterations: methods, results and importance in human health. Springer, Berlin, pp 241–255

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Wojcik A, Bruckmann E, Obe G (2004) Insights into the mechanisms of sister chromatid exchange formation. Cytogenet Genome Res 104:304–309

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Albertini RJ, Anderson D, Douglas GR et al (2000) IPCS guidelines for the monitoring of genotoxic effects of carcinogens in humans. Mutat Res 463:111–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Carrano AV, Natarajan AT (1988) Considerations for population monitoring using cytogenetic techniques. Mutat Res 204:379–406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hsu C–H, Stedeford T (2010) Cancer risk assessment, chemical carcinogenesis, hazard evaluation, and risk quantification. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Kirkland D, Gatehouse D (2010) In vitro genotox assays. In: Hsu C-H, Stedeford T (eds) Cancer risk assessment, chemical carcinogenesis, hazard evaluation, and risk quantification. Wiley, New Jersey, pp 272–288

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Müller L, Martus HJ (2010) Genetic toxicology testing guidelines and regulations. In: Hsu C-H, Stadeford T (eds) Cancer risk assessment, chemical carcinogenesis, hazard evaluation, and risk quantification. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, pp 238–271

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Marshall R, Obe G (1998) Application of chromosome painting to clastogenicity testing in vitro. Environ Mol Mutagenesis 32:212–2228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Natarajan AT, Obe G (1980) Screening of human populations for mutations induced by environmental pollutants: use of human lymphocyte system. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 4:468–481

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Obe G, Sperling K, Belitz HJ (1971) Some aspects of chemical mutagenesis in man and in Drosophila. Angew Chem, Internat Edn 10: 302–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Thybaud V (2010) In vivo genotoxicity assays. In: Hsu C-H, Stedeford T (eds) Cancer risk assessment, chemical carcinogenesis, hazard evaluation, and risk quantification. Wiley, New Jersey, pp 289–359

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Zeiger E (2010) Development of genetic toxicology testing and its incorporation into regulatory health effects test requirements. In: Hsu C-H, Stedeford T (eds) Cancer risk assessment, chemical carcinogenesis, hazard evaluation, and risk quantification. Wiley, New Jersey, pp 225–237

    Google Scholar 

  33. Madle S, Obe G (1980) Methods for analysis of the mutagenicity of indirect mutagens/carcinogens in eukaryotic cells. Hum Genet 56:7–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Madle S, Westphal D, Hilbig V et al (1978) Testing in vitro of an indirect mutagen (cyclophosphamide) with human leukocyte cultures, activation by liver perfusion and by incubation with crude liver homogenate. Mutat Res 54:95–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Obe G, Jonas R, Schmidt S (1986) Metabolism of ethanol in vitro produces a compound which induces sister-chromatid exchanges in human peripheral lymphocytes in vitro: acetaldehyde not ethanol is mutagenic. Mutat Res 174:47–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. IARC (1988) Vol 44, Alcohol drinking. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  37. IARC (2010) Vol 95, Alcohol consumption and ethyl carbamate. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  38. Obe G, Anderson D (1987) Genetic effects of ethanol. Mutat Res 186:177–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Obe G, Beek B (1979) Mutagenic activity of aldehydes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 4:91–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Obe G, Ristow H (1979) Mutagenic, cancerogenic and teratogenic effects of alcohol. Mutat Res 65:229–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Obe G, Ristow H, Herha J (1979) Effect of ethanol on chromosomal structure and function. In: Majchrowicz E, Noble EP (eds) Biochemistry and pharmacology of ethanol, vol 1. Plenum, New York, pp 659–676

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Hoeft H, Obe G (1983) SCE-inducing congeners in alcoholic beverages. Mutat Res 121:247–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. IARC (1986) Vol 38, Tobacco smoking. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  44. Obe G, Vogt HJ, Madle S et al (1982) Double-blind study on the effect of cigarette smoking on the chromosomes of human peripheral blood lymphocytes in vivo. Mutat Res 92:309–319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Obe G, Heller WD, Vogt HJ (1984) Mutagenic activity of cigarette smoke. In: Obe G (ed) Mutations in man. Springer, Berlin, pp 223–246

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. Obe G, Lloyd DC, Durante M (2011) Chromosomal aberrations in human populations and cancer. In: Obe G, Jandrig B, Marchant GE et al (eds) Cancer risk evaluation, methods and trends. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp 139–161

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. IAEA (2011) Cytogenetic dosimetry: applications in preparedness for and response to radiation emergencies. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  48. Iwasaki T, Takashima Y, Suzuki T et al (2011) The dose response of chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes induced in vitro by very low-dose γ-rays. Radiat Res 175:208–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Lloyd DC, Edwards AA, Leonard A et al (1992) Chromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes induced in vitro by very low doses of X-rays. Int J Radiat Biol 61:335–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Johannes, C., Obe, G. (2013). Chromosomal Aberration Test in Human Lymphocytes. In: Dhawan, A., Bajpayee, M. (eds) Genotoxicity Assessment. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1044. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-529-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-529-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-528-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-529-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics