Skip to main content

The Comet Assay in Human Biomonitoring

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Book cover Genotoxicity Assessment

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1044))

Abstract

Human biomonitoring studies aim to identify potential exposures to environmental, occupational, or lifestyle toxicants in human populations and are commonly used by public health decision makers to predict disease risk. The Comet assay measures changes in genomic stability and is one of the most reliable biomarkers to indicate early biological effects, and therefore accepted by various governmental regulatory agencies. The appeal of the Comet assay lies in its relative simplicity, rapidity, sensitivity, and economic efficiency. Furthermore, the assay is known for its broad versatility, as it can be applied to virtually any human cell and easily adapted in order to detect particular biomarkers of interest, such as DNA repair capacity or single- and double-strand breaks. In a standard experiment, isolated single cells are first embedded in agarose, and then lysed in high-salt solutions in order to remove all cellular contents except the DNA attached to a nuclear scaffold. Subsequent electrophoresis results in accumulation of undamaged DNA sequences at the proximity of the nuclear scaffold, while damaged sequences migrate towards the anode. When visualized with fluorochromes, these migrated DNA fragments resemble a comet tail and can be quantified for their intensity and shape according to internationally drafted guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Angerer J, Aylward LL, Hays SM et al (2011) Human biomonitoring assessment values: approaches and data requirements. Int J Hyg Environ Health 214:348–360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bartsch H, Arab K, Nair J (2011) Biomarkers for hazard identification in humans. Environ Health 10(Suppl 1):S11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schoeters GE, Den Hond E, Koppen G et al (2011) Biomonitoring and biomarkers to unravel the risks from prenatal environmental exposures for later health outcomes. Am J Clin Nutr 94:1964S–1969S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson D, Zeiger E (1997) Human monitoring. Environ Mol Mutagen 30:95–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Paini A, Scholz G, Marin-Kuan M et al (2011) Quantitative comparison between in vivo DNA adduct formation from exposure to selected DNA-reactive carcinogens, natural background levels of DNA adduct formation and tumour incidence in rodent bioassays. Mutagenesis 26:605–618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Woo LL, Egner PA, Belanger CL et al (2011) Aflatoxin B1-DNA adduct formation and mutagenicity in livers of neonatal male and female B6C3F1 mice. Toxicol Sci 122:38–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sipinen V, Laubenthal J, Baumgartner A et al (2010) In vitro evaluation of baseline and induced DNA damage in human sperm exposed to benzo[a]pyrene or its metabolite benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-diol-9,10-epoxide, using the comet assay. Mutagenesis 25:417–425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Neumann HG (2009) Risk assessment of chemical carcinogens and thresholds. Crit Rev Toxicol 39:449–461

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dusinska M, Collins AR (2008) The comet assay in human biomonitoring: gene-environment interactions. Mutagenesis 23:191–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Laubenthal J, Zlobinskaya O, Poterlowicz K et al (2012) Cigarette smoke-induced transgenerational alterations in genome stability in cord blood of human F1 offspring. FASEB J. doi:10.1096/fj.11-201194

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Baumgartner A, Kurzawa-Zegota M, Laubenthal J et al (2012) Comet-assay parameters as rapid biomarkers of exposure to dietary/environmental compounds – an in vitro feasibility study on spermatozoa and lymphocytes. Mutat Res 743:25–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ostling O, Johanson KJ (1984) Microelectrophoretic study of radiation-induced DNA damages in individual mammalian cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 123:291–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh NP, McCoy MT, Tice RR et al (1988) A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res 175:184–191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Olive PL, Banath JP, Durand RE (1990) Heterogeneity in radiation-induced DNA damage and repair in tumor and normal cells measured using the “comet” assay. Radiat Res 122:86–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tice RR, Agurell E, Anderson D et al (2000) Single cell gel/comet assay: guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing. Environ Mol Mutagen 35:206–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Albertini RJ, Anderson D, Douglas GR et al (2000) IPCS guidelines for the monitoring of genotoxic effects of carcinogens in humans. International Programme on Chemical Safety. Mutat Res 463:111–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fairbairn DW, Olive PL, O'Neill KL (1995) The comet assay: a comprehensive review. Mutat Res 339:37–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Klaude M, Eriksson S, Nygren J et al (1996) The comet assay: mechanisms and technical considerations. Mutat Res 363:89–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Collins AR (2004) The comet assay for DNA damage and repair: principles, applications, and limitations. Mol Biotechnol 26:249–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Anderson D, Schmid TE, Baumgartner A et al (2003) Oestrogenic compounds and oxidative stress (in human sperm and lymphocytes in the Comet assay). Mutat Res 544:173–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cemeli E, Baumgartner A, Anderson D (2009) Antioxidants and the Comet assay. Mutat Res 681(1):51–67. doi:0.1016/j.mrrev.2008.05.002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Collins AR, Azqueta A (2012) D ; further applications of the comet assay. Mutat Res 736(1–2):122–129. doi:10.1016 /j.mrfmmm.2011.03.005

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hartmann A, Speit G (1997) The contribution of cytotoxicity to DNA-effects in the single cell gel test (comet assay). Toxicol Lett 90:183–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Collins AR, Oscoz AA, Brunborg G et al (2008) The comet assay: topical issues. Mutagenesis 23:143–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Valverde M, Rojas E (2009) Environmental and occupational biomonitoring using the Comet assay. Mutat Res 681:93–109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. American Society of Reproductive Medicine (2008) Smoking and infertility. Fertil Steril 90:S254–S259

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chuang CH, Hu ML (2004) Use of whole blood directly for single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assay in vivo and white blood cells for in vitro assay. Mutat Res 564:75–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Anderson D, Yu TW, Dobrzynska MM et al (1997) Effects in the Comet assay of storage conditions on human blood. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen 17:115–125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Anderson D (2005) Male-mediated developmental toxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 207:506–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Collins AR (2009) Investigating oxidative DNA damage and its repair using the comet assay. Mutat Res 681:24–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Azqueta A, Shaposhnikov S, Collins AR (2009) DNA oxidation: investigating its key role in environmental mutagenesis with the comet assay. Mutat Res 674:101–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kumaravel TS, Vilhar B, Faux SP et al (2009) Comet assay measurements: a perspective. Cell Biol Toxicol 25:53–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wood DK, Weingeist DM, Bhatia SN et al (2010) Single cell trapping and DNA damage analysis using microwell arrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:10008–10013

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The funding from the UK India Education and Research Initiative (UKIERI) standard award to the University of Bradford, UK, and the Institute of Life Sciences, Ahmedabad University, India, is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Anderson, D., Dhawan, A., Laubenthal, J. (2013). The Comet Assay in Human Biomonitoring. In: Dhawan, A., Bajpayee, M. (eds) Genotoxicity Assessment. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1044. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-529-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-529-3_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-528-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-529-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics