Abstract
Since its inception in 1997/1998, the synaptic tagging and capture hypothesis (STC) of protein synthesis-dependent synaptic plasticity has inspired a wide range of studies attempting to further our understanding of heterosynaptic plasticity and its relevance to learning and memory. In the last few years, some behavioral predictions of the STC hypothesis have been confirmed, successfully translating electrophysiology into behavior. In this chapter, we describe the principles and caveats behind experiments on STC. In electrophysiological experiments, the necessity for long stable recordings and the need for multiple convergent inputs together pose considerable technical challenges. We describe how to secure sustained recordings in acute hippocampal brain slices. We also outline how to exploit multiple input pathways to identify specific molecules that may be plasticity-related products involved in the tagging process or in the synaptic capture of long-term plasticity. In behavioral experiments, we describe novel protocols to explore whether weak encoding events that usually produce a short-lasting memory can be rescued by a closely timed but unrelated neuromodulatory experience. This phenomenon can be used to identify, within the STC framework, the mechanisms of action of memory-altering compounds. We also propose further protocols to reveal the mechanisms behind this form of neuromodulation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Frey U, Morris RGM (1997) Synaptic tagging and long-term potentiation. Nature 385:533–536
Frey U, Morris RGM (1998) Synaptic tagging: implications for late maintenance of hippocampal long-term potentiation. Trends Neurosci 21:181–188
Frey U, Morris RGM (1998) Weak before strong: dissociating synaptic tagging and plasticity-factor accounts of late-LTP. Neuropharmacology 37:545–552
Redondo RL, Morris RGM (2011) Making memories last: the synaptic tagging and capture hypothesis. Nat Rev Neurosci 12:17–30
Martin SJ, Grimwood PD, Morris RG (2000) Synaptic plasticity and memory: an evaluation of the hypothesis. Annu Rev Neurosci 23:649–711
Moncada D, Viola H (2007) Induction of long-term memory by exposure to novelty requires protein synthesis: evidence for a behavioral tagging. J Neurosci 27:7476–7481
Wang SH, Redondo RL, Morris RG (2010) Relevance of synaptic tagging and capture to the persistence of long-term potentiation and everyday spatial memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:19537–19542
Ballarini F, Moncada D, Martinez MC et al (2009) Behavioral tagging is a general mechanism of long-term memory formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:14599–14604
Creager R, Dunwiddie T, Lynch G (1980) Paired-pulse and frequency facilitation in the CA1 region of the in vitro rat hippocampus. J Physiol 299:409–424
Sajikumar S, Navakkode S, Frey JU (2005) Protein synthesis-dependent long-term functional plasticity: methods and techniques. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15:607–613
Masino SA, Latini S, Bordoni F et al (2001) Changes in hippocampal adenosine efflux, ATP levels, and synaptic transmission induced by increased temperature. Synapse 41:58–64
Moser E, Mathiesen I, Andersen P (1993) Association between brain temperature and dentate field potentials in exploring and swimming rats. Science 259:1324–1326
Watson PL, Weiner JL, Carlen PL (1997) Effects of variations in hippocampal slice preparation protocol on the electrophysiological stability, epileptogenicity and graded hypoxia responses of CA1 neurons. Brain Res 775:134–143
Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Bonhoeffer T (2006) Neuronal activity determines the protein synthesis dependence of long-term potentiation. Nat Neurosci 9:478–480
Redondo RL, Okuno H, Spooner PA et al (2010) Synaptic tagging and capture: differential role of distinct calcium/calmodulin kinases in protein synthesis-dependent long-term potentiation. J Neurosci 30:4981–4989
Vazdarjanova A, Ramirez-Amaya V, Insel N et al (2006) Spatial exploration induces ARC, a plasticity-related immediate-early gene, only in calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II-positive principal excitatory and inhibitory neurons of the rat forebrain. J Comp Neurol 498:317–329
Miyashita T, Kubik S, Haghighi N et al (2009) Rapid activation of plasticity-associated gene transcription in hippocampal neurons provides a mechanism for encoding of one-trial experience. J Neurosci 29:898–906
Bi AL, Wang Y, Li BQ et al (2010) Region-specific involvement of actin rearrangement-related synaptic structure alterations in conditioned taste aversion memory. Learn Mem 17:420–427
Morris RGM, Anderson E, Lynch GS et al (1986) Selective impairment of learning and blockade of long-term potentiation by an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, AP5. Nature 319:774–776
Pitkanen RI, Korpi ER, Oja SS (1985) Cerebral cortex slices in sodium-free medium: depletion of synaptic vesicles. Brain Res 326:384–387
Cooke WJ, Robinson JD (1971) Factors influencing calcium movements in rat brain slices. Am J Physiol 221:218–225
Snow RW, Taylor CP, Dudek FE (1983) Electrophysiological and optical changes in slices of rat hippocampus during spreading depression. J Neurophysiol 50:561–572
Somjen GG, Aitken PG, Balestrino M et al (1990) Spreading depression-like depolarization and selective vulnerability of neurons. A brief review. Stroke 21:III179–III183
Fonseca R, Nagerl UV, Morris RGM et al (2004) Competing for memory: hippocampal LTP under regimes of reduced protein synthesis. Neuron 44:1011–1020
Reymann KG, Malisch R, Schulzeck K et al (1985) The duration of long-term potentiation in the CA1 region of the hippocampal slice preparation. Brain Res Bull 15:249–255
Croning MDR, Haddad GG (1998) Comparison of brain slice chamber designs for investigations of oxygen deprivation in vitro. J Neurosci Methods 81:103–111
Fiala JC, Kirov SA, Feinberg MD et al (2003) Timing of neuronal and glial ultrastructure disruption during brain slice preparation and recovery in vitro. J Comp Neurol 465:90–103
Schuchmann S, Meierkord H, Stenkamp K et al (2002) Synaptic and nonsynaptic ictogenesis occurs at different temperatures in submerged and interface rat brain slices. J Neurophysiol 87:2929–2935
Reid KH, Edmonds HL Jr, Schurr A et al (1988) Pitfalls in the use of brain slices. Prog Neurobiol 31:1–18
Aitken PG, Breese GR, Dudek FF et al (1995) Preparative methods for brain slices: a discussion. J Neurosci Methods 59:139–149
Lipton P, Aitken PG, Dudek FE et al (1995) Making the best of brain slices; comparing preparative methods. J Neurosci Methods 59:151–156
Skrede KK, Westgaard RH (1971) The transverse hippocampal slice: a well-defined cortical structure maintained in vitro. Brain Res 35:589–593
Sajikumar S, Navakkode S, Frey JU (2008) Distinct single but not necessarily repeated tetanization is required to induce hippocampal late-LTP in the rat CA1. Learn Mem 15:46–49
Schurr A, Reid KH, Tseng MT et al (1986) Effect of electrical stimulation on the viability of the hippocampal slice preparation. Brain Res Bull 16:299–301
Navakkode S, Sajikumar S, Frey JU (2007) Synergistic requirements for the induction of dopaminergic D1/D5-receptor-mediated LTP in hippocampal slices of rat CA1 in vitro. Neuropharmacology 52:1547–1554
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Redondo, R., Morris, R.G.M. (2013). Electrophysiological and Behavioral Approaches to the Analysis of Synaptic Tagging and Capture. In: Nguyen, P. (eds) Multidisciplinary Tools for Investigating Synaptic Plasticity. Neuromethods, vol 81. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-517-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-517-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-516-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-517-0
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols