Skip to main content

Genotype Imputation to Increase Sample Size in Pedigreed Populations

  • Protocol
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1019))

Abstract

Genotype imputation is a cost-effective way to increase the power of genomic selection or genome-wide association studies. While several genotype imputation algorithms are available, this chapter focuses on a heuristic algorithm, as implemented in the AlphaImpute software. This algorithm combines long-range phasing, haplotype library imputation, and segregation analysis and it is specifically designed to work with pedigreed populations.

The chapter is organized in different sections. First the challenges related to genotype imputation in pedigreed populations are described, along with the specifics of the imputation algorithm used in AlphaImpute. In the second section, factors affecting the accuracy of genotype imputation using this algorithm are discussed. The different parameters that control AlphaImpute are detailed and examples of how to apply AlphaImpute are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Protocol
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

References

  1. Browning SR, Browning BL (2007) Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. Am J Hum Genet 81:1084–1097

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Howie BN, Donnelly P, Marchini J (2009) A flexible and accurate genotype imputation method for the next generation of genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genet 5:e1000529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Li Y, Willer CJ, Ding J, Scheet P, Abecasis GR (2010) MaCH: using sequence and genotype data to estimate haplotypes and unobserved genotypes. Genet Epidemiol 34(8):816–834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Druet T, Georges M (2010) A hidden Markov model combining linkage and linkage disequilibrium information for haplotype reconstruction and quantitative trait locus fine mapping. Genetics 184:789–798

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Habier D, Fernando RL, Garrick DJ (2010) A combined strategy to infer high-density SNP haplotypes in large pedigrees. Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Leipzig, 1–6 August 2010. pdf 09–15

    Google Scholar 

  6. Daetwyler HD, Wiggans GR, Hayes BJ, Woolliams JA, Goddard ME (2011) Imputation of missing genotypes from sparse to high density using long-range phasing. Genetics 189:317–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. VanRaden PM, O’Connell JR, Wiggans GR, Weigel KA (2011) Genomic evaluations with many more genotypes. Genet Sel Evol 243:10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hickey JM, Kinghorn BP, Tier B, van der Werf JHJ, Cleveland MA (2012) A phasing and imputation method for pedigreed populations that results in a single-stage genomic evaluation. Genet Sel Evol 44:9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Scheet P, Stephens M (2006) A fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data: applications to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase. Am J Hum Genet 78:629–644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sargolzaei M, Chesnais JP, Schenkel F (2011) FImpute—an efficient imputation algorithm for dairy cattle populations. J Dairy Sci 94(1 (E-Suppl 1)):421, Abstract

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang Z, Druet T (2010) Marker imputation with low-density marker panels in Dutch Holstein cattle. J Dairy Sci 93:5487–5494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang Y, Hickey JM, Cleveland MA, Maltecca C (2012) Assessment of alternative genotyping strategies to maximize imputation accuracy at minimal cost. Genet Sel Evol 44:25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kerr RJ, Kinghorn BP (1996) An efficient algorithm for segregation analysis in large populations. J Anim Breed Genet 113:457–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hickey JM, Kinghorn BP, Tier B, Wilson JF, Dunstan N, van der Werf JHJ (2011) A combined long-range phasing and long haplotype imputation method to impute phase for SNP genotypes. Genet Sel Evol 43:12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Hickey, J.M., Cleveland, M.A., Maltecca, C., Gorjanc, G., Gredler, B., Kranis, A. (2013). Genotype Imputation to Increase Sample Size in Pedigreed Populations. In: Gondro, C., van der Werf, J., Hayes, B. (eds) Genome-Wide Association Studies and Genomic Prediction. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1019. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-447-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-447-0_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-446-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-447-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics