Skip to main content

Generation and Characterization of Murine Alternatively Activated Macrophages

  • Protocol
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 946))

Abstract

Macrophages play a key role in the innate immune response and help to direct the acquired immune response. Early in the innate immune response, they produce reactive oxygen species and pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines to drive inflammation and are referred to as “classically activated” or “killer” macrophages (M1). During the resolution phase of inflammation, they switch to what is known as an “alternatively activated” phenotype or “healer” macrophage (M2) and contribute to debris scavenging, angiogenesis, and wound healing. M1 macrophages are activated by treatment with IFNγ or LPS and M2 macrophages are activated by treatment with Th2 cytokines IL-4 or IL-13 and the M2 phenotype switch can be enhanced by IL-10. Macrophages can also be skewed during differentiation in vitro, and the resultant phenotype depends upon the cytokine provided to support their differentiation. In murine macrophages, MCSF promotes differentiation to an M1 phenotype, GM-CSF promotes differentiation to an M2 phenotype and IL-3 promotes differentiation into a profoundly M2 skewed phenotype. A defining feature of the phenotype of murine M1 versus M2 macrophages is how they metabolize L-arginine. In response to an inflammatory stimulus like LPS, M1 macrophages produce inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) which uses L-arginine as a substrate to produce nitric oxide (NO). M2 macrophages constitutively produce the enzyme arginase I (argI), which sequesters L-arginine from iNOS and results in the production of ornithine and downstream polyamines and L-proline. M1 macrophages also produce relatively higher levels of pro-inflammatory IL-12 and lower levels of anti-inflammatory IL-10 relative to M2 macrophages. In this chapter, we describe in vitro derivation of polarized bone marrow macrophages and methods to analyze the resulting phenotype including Q-PCR, Western blotting, and enzyme assays to determine argI and iNOS expression and activity, as well as production of IL-12p40 and IL-10 and determination of IL-12/IL-10 ratios. Production of iNOS, NO, IL-12p40, and IL-10 are measured after treatment with LPS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Protocol
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

References

  1. Martinez FO, Sica A, Mantovani A, Locati M (2008) Macrophage activation and polarization. Front Biosci 13:453–461

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Adamson R (2009) Role of macrophages in normal wound healing: an overview. J Wound Care 18:349–351

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gordon S (2003) Alternative activation of macrophages. Nat Rev Immunol 3:23–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gordon S (2007) Macrophage heterogeneity and tissue lipids. J Clin Invest 117:89–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nair MG, Gallagher IJ, Taylor MD, Loke P, Coulson PS, Wilson RA, Maizels RM, Allen JE (2005) Chitinase and Fizz family members are a generalized feature of nematode infection with selective upregulation of Ym1 and Fizz1 by antigen-presenting cells. Infect Immun 73:385–394

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Munder M (2009) Arginase: an emerging key player in the mammalian immune system. Br J Pharmacol 158:638–651

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yeramian A, Martin L, Arpa L, Bertran J, Soler C, McLeod C, Modolell M, Palacin M, Lloberas J, Celada A (2006) Macrophages require distinct arginine catabolism and transport systems for proliferation and for activation. Eur J Immunol 36:1516–1526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee J, Ryu H, Ferrante RJ, Morris SM Jr, Ratan RR (2003) Translational control of inducible nitric oxide synthase expression by arginine can explain the arginine paradox. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:4843–4848

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Heinsbroek SE, Gordon S (2009) The role of macrophages in inflammatory bowel diseases. Expert Rev Mol Med 11:e14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F (2008) Cancer-related inflammation. Nature 454:436–444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ho VW, Sly LM (2009) Derivation and characterization of murine alternatively activated (M2) macrophages. Methods Mol Biol 531:173–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brombacher F, Arendse B, Peterson R, Holscher A, Holscher C (2009) Analyzing classical and alternative macrophage activation in macrophage/neutrophil-specific IL-4 receptor-alpha-deficient mice. Methods Mol Biol 531:225–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rauh MJ, Ho V, Pereira C, Sham A, Sly LM, Lam V, Huxham L, Minchinton AI, Mui A, Krystal G (2005) SHIP represses the generation of alternatively activated macrophages. Immunity 23:361–374

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sinha P, Clements VK, Ostrand-Rosenberg S (2005) Reduction of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and induction of M1 macrophages facilitate the rejection of established metastatic disease. J Immunol 174:636–645

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuroda E, Ho V, Ruschmann J, Antignano F, Hamilton M, Rauh MJ, Antov A, Flavell RA, Sly LM, Krystal G (2009) SHIP represses the generation of IL-3-induced M2 macrophages by inhibiting IL-4 production from basophils. J Immunol 183:3652–3660

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fleetwood AJ, Lawrence T, Hamilton JA, Cook AD (2007) Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (CSF) and macrophage CSF-dependent macrophage phenotypes display differences in cytokine profiles and transcription factor activities: implications for CSF blockade in inflammation. J Immunol 178:5245–5252

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuroda E, Noguchi J, Doi T, Uematsu S, Akira S, Yamashita U (2007) IL-3 is an important differentiation factor for the development of prostaglandin E2-producing macrophages between C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice. Eur J Immunol 37:2185–2195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura M. Sly .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Weisser, S.B., McLarren, K.W., Kuroda, E., Sly, L.M. (2013). Generation and Characterization of Murine Alternatively Activated Macrophages. In: Helgason, C., Miller, C. (eds) Basic Cell Culture Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 946. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-128-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-128-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-127-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-128-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics