Advertisement

Ultrastructural Analysis of Testicular Tissue and Sperm by Transmission and Scanning Electron Microscopy

  • Hector E. Chemes
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 927)

Abstract

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) studies have provided the basis for an in-depth understanding of the cell biology and normal functioning of the testis and male gametes and have opened the way to characterize the functional role played by specific organelles in spermatogenesis and sperm function. The development of the scanning electron microscope (SEM) extended these boundaries to the recognition of cell and organ surface features and the architectural array of cells and tissues. The merging of immunocytochemical and histochemical approaches with electron microscopy has completed a series of technical improvements that integrate structural and functional features to provide a broad understanding of cell biology in health and disease. With these advances the detailed study of the intricate structural and molecular organization as well as the chemical composition of cellular organelles is now possible. Immunocytochemistry is used to identify proteins or other components and localize them in specific cells or organelles with high specificity and sensitivity, and histochemistry can be used to understand their function (i.e., enzyme activity). When these techniques are used in conjunction with electron microscopy their resolving power is further increased to subcellular levels. In the present chapter we will describe in detail various ultrastructural techniques that are now available for basic or translational research in reproductive biology and reproductive medicine. These include TEM, ultrastructural immunocytochemistry, ultrastructural histochemistry, and SEM.

Key words

Transmission electron microscopy Ultrastructural immunocytochemistry Ultrastructural histochemistry Scanning electron microscopy Testes Semen Spermatozoa Spermatogenesis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Supported by Grants from CONICET (PIP 112200901 00615) and ANPCyT (PICT 2005 38229). Figures 6 and 1 are modified from refs. 12 and 17, Fig. 4d is taken from ref. 15, and Fig. 2d is taken from ref. 18 with permission (see figure legends).

The author is indebted to Prof. I. von Lawzewitsch and R. Mancini from the Histology Department, Buenos Aires University and Prof. Don W. Fawcett and all staff from the Anatomy Department, Harvard Medical School where his initial training in electron microscopy took place. Special thanks to R. Burghardt Ph.D., M. Musse M.Sc., and other colleagues with whom the author has collaborated over the years.

References

  1. 1.
    Fawcett DW (1975) The mammalian spermatozoon. Dev Biol 44:394–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chemes HE et al (1998) Ultrastructural pathology of the sperm flagellum: association between flagellar pathology and fertility prognosis in severely asthenozoospermic men. Hum Reprod 13:2521–2526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Musse M, Chemes HE (2005) Ultrastructural immunocytochemistryof Leydig cell enzyme and sperm tail protein using antigen retrieval by microwave irradiation. Treballs de la Societat Catalana de Biología 56:101–106Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leong AS, Sormunen RT (1998) Microwave procedures for electron microscopy and resin-embedded sections. Micron 29:397–409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xiao JC et al (1996) A comparison of methods for heat-mediated antigen retrieval for immunoelectron microscopy: demonstration of cytokeratin No. 18 in normal and neoplastic hepatocytes. Biotech Histochem 71:278–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chemes H (1986) The phagocytic function of Sertoli cells: a morphological, biochemical, and endocrinological study of lysosomes and acid phosphatase localization in the rat testis. Endocrinology 119:1673–1681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gomori T (1952) Microscopic Histochemistry: Principles and practicies. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Polasaki Z et al (1968) Hydrolytic enzymes during spermatogenesis in rats. An electron microscopic and histochemical study. J Histochem Cytochem 16:249–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chemes HE et al (1999) Acephalic spermatozoa and abnormal development of the head-neck attachment: a human syndrome of genetic origin. Hum Reprod 14:1811–1818PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vitale R et al (1973) The normal development of the blood-testis barrier and the effects of clomiphene and estrogen treatment. Anat Rec 176:331–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chemes HE et al (1979) Hormonal regulation of Sertoli cell differentiation. Biol Reprod 21:251–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chemes HE et al (1979) The role of gonadotropins and testosterone on initiation of spermatogenesis in the immature rat. Biol Reprod 21:241–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wilton LJ et al (1985) Structural heterogeneity of the axonemes of respiratory cilia and sperm flagella in normal men. J Clin Invest 75:825–831PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alvarez Sedo, C., et al. (2012) Inmucyto­chemical and ultrastructural study of the acrosome formation inhuman globozoospermia. Human reproduction 27:1912–1921Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Turner RM et al (2001) Molecular genetic analysis of two human sperm fibrous sheath proteins, AKAP4 and AKAP3, in men with dysplasia of the fibrous sheath. J Androl 22:302–315PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miller F, Palade GE (1964) Lytic activities in renal protein absorption droplets. An electron microscopical cytochemical study. J Cell Biol 23:519–552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chemes HE et al (1977) Patho-physiological observations of Sertoli cells in patients with germinal aplasia or severe germ cell depletion. Ultrastructural findings and hormone levels. Biol Reprod 17:108–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chemes EH, Rawe YV (2003) Sperm pathology: a step beyond descriptive morphology. Origin, characterization and fertility potential of abnormal sperm phenotypes in infertile men. Hum Reprod Update 9:405–428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Research in Endocrinology (CEDIE)National Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires Children’s HospitalBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations