Abstract
G-Protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are seven helical transmembrane proteins that mediate cell signaling thereby controlling many important physiological and pathological functions. GPCRs get activated upon ligand binding and trigger the signal transduction process. GPCRs exist in multiple inactive and active conformations, and there is a finite population of the active and inactive states even in the ligand-free condition. An understanding of the nature of the conformational ensemble sampled by GPCRs and the atomic level mechanism of the conformational transitions require a combination of computational methods and experimental techniques. We have developed a coarse grained discrete conformational sampling computational method called “LITiCon” to map the conformational ensemble sampled by GPCRs in the presence and absence of ligands. The LITiCon method can also be used to predict functional selective conformational states starting from the inactive state of the receptor.
LITiCon has been applied to map the conformational ensemble of β2-adrenergic receptor, a class A GPCR. We have shown that β2-adrenergic receptor samples a larger conformational space in the ligand-free state and that different ligands select and stabilize conformations from this ensemble. In this review we describe the LITiCon method in detail and elucidate the uses and pitfalls of this method.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kenakin TP (2007) Collateral efficacy in drug discovery: taking advantage of the good (allosteric) nature of 7TM receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci 28:407–415
Mailman RB, Murthy V (2010) Ligand functional selectivity advances our understanding of drug mechanisms and drug discovery. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:345–346
Vaidehi N, Kenakin T (2010) Conformational ensembles of seven transmembrane receptors and their relevance to functional selectivity. Curr Opin Pharmacol 10:775–781
Niesen MJM, Bhattacharya S, Vaidehi N (2011) The role of conformational ensembles in ligand recognition in G-protein coupled receptors. J Am Chem Soc 133:13197–13204
Rasmussen SG, Choi HJ, Fung JJ, Pardon E, Casarosa P, Chae PS et al (2011) Structure of a nanobody-stabilized active state of the β2 adrenoceptor. Nature 469:175–180
Warne T, Moukhametzianov R, Baker JG, Nehmé R, Edwards PC, Leslie AG et al (2011) The structural basis for agonist and partial agonist action on a β1-adrenergic receptor. Nature 469:241–244
Xu F, Wu H, Katritch V, Han GW, Jacobson KA, Gao Z, Cherezov V, Stevens RC (2011) Structure of an agonist bound human A2A adenosine receptor. Science 332:322–327
Landes CF, Ramabhadran A, Taylor JN, Salatan F, Jayaraman V (2011) Structural landscape of isolated agonist-binding domains from single AMPA receptors. Nat Chem Biol 7:168–173
Balaraman G, Bhattacharya S, Vaidehi N (2010) Structural insights into conformational stability of wild type and mutant β1-adrenergic receptor. Biophys J 99:568–577
Bhattacharya S, Subramanian G, Hall S, Lin J, Laoui A, Vaidehi N (2010) Allosteric antagonist binding sites in class B GPCRs: corticotropin receptor 1. J Comput Aided Mol Des 8:659–674
Bhattacharya S, Vaidehi N (2010) Computational mapping of the conformational transitions in agonist selective pathways of a G-protein coupled receptor. J Am Chem Soc 132:5205–5214
Bhattacharya S, Hall SE, Vaidehi N (2008) Agonist-induced conformational changes in bovine rhodopsin: insight into activation of G-protein-coupled receptors. J Mol Biol 382:539–555
Bhattacharya S, Hall SE, Li H, Vaidehi N (2008) Ligand-stabilized conformational states of human β2 adrenergic receptor: insight into G-protein-coupled receptor activation. Biophys J 94:2027–2042
Lam AR, Bhattacharya S, Patel K, Hall SE, Mao A, Vaidehi N (2011) Importance of receptor flexibility in binding of cyclam compounds to the chemokine receptor CXCR4. J Chem Inf Model 51:139–147
Vaidehi N (2010) Dynamics and flexibility of G-protein coupled receptor conformations and its relevance to drug design. Drug Discov Today 15:951–957
Kikkawa H, Kurose H, Isogaya M, Sato Y, Nagao T (1997) Differential contribution of two serine residues of wild type and constitutively active β2-adrenoceptors to the interaction with β2-selective agonists. Br J Pharmacol 121:1059–1064
Swaminath G, Xiang Y, Lee TW, Steenhuis J, Parnot C, Kobilka BK (2004) Sequential binding of agonists to the β2 adrenoceptor: kinetic evidence for intermediate conformational states. J Biol Chem 279:686–691
Swaminath G, Deupi X, Lee TW, Zhu W, Thian FS, Kobilka TS, Kobilka BK (2005) Probing the β2 adrenoceptor binding site with catechol reveals differences in binding and activation by agonists and partial agonists. J Biol Chem 280:22165–22171
Canutescu AA, Shelenkov AA, Dunbrack RL Jr (2003) A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction. Prot Sci 12:2001–2014
Zamanakos G (2001) A fast and accurate analytical method for the computation of solvent effects in molecular simulations. Ph. D. thesis. Caltech, Pasadena
McDonald IK, Thornton JM (1994) Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins. J Mol Biol 238:777–793
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Bhattacharya, S., Vaidehi, N. (2012). LITiCon: A Discrete Conformational Sampling Computational Method for Mapping Various Functionally Selective Conformational States of Transmembrane Helical Proteins. In: Vaidehi, N., Klein-Seetharaman, J. (eds) Membrane Protein Structure and Dynamics. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 914. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-023-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-023-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-022-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-023-6
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols