Skip to main content

Measurement of Cell Viability

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Plant Cell Culture Protocols

Abstract

An overview of the methods for assessing cell viability is presented. Different protocols of the most commonly used assays are described in detail so that the readers may be able to determine which assay is suitable for their own projects in plant biotechnology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Vanková R, Kuncová G, Opatmá J et al (2001) Two-dimensional fluorescence spectroscopy – a new tool for the determination of plant cell viability. Plant Cell Rep 20:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wei N, You J, Friehs K et al (2007) In situ dark field microscopy for on-line monitoring of yeast cultures. Biotechnol Lett 29:373–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Palta JP, Levitt J, Stadeimann EJ (1978) Plant viability assay. Cryobiology 15:249–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pegg DE (1989) Viability assays for preserved cells, tissues and organs. Cryobiology 26: 212–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith BA, Reider ML, Fletcher JS (1982) Relationship between vital staining and subculture growth during the senescence of plant tissue culture. Plant Physiol 70:1228–1230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baker CJ, Mock MM (1994) An improved method for monitoring cell death in cell suspension and leaf disc assays using Evans blue. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 39:7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang CN, Cornejo MJ, Bush DS et al (1986) Estimating viability of plant protoplasts using double and single staining. Protoplasma 135:80–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hou BH, Lin CG (1996) Rapid optimization of electroporation conditions for soybean and tomato suspension cultured cells. Plant Physiol 111(Suppl 2):166

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cripen RW, Perrier JL (1974) The use of neutral red and Evans blue for live-dead determinations of marine plankton. Stain Technol 49: 97–104

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wildholm JM (1972) The use of fluorescein diacetate and phenosafranine for determining viability of cultured plant cells. Stain Technol 47:189–194

    Google Scholar 

  11. Towill LE, Mazur P (1975) Studies on the reduction of 2,3,5- triphenyltetrazolium chloride as viability assay for plant tissue cultures. Can J Bot 53:1097–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moreira-Quiroz J, Valencia-Delgado V, Chávez-Burbano P (2009) Implementación de un algoritmo para la detección y conteo de células en imágenes microscópicas. http://www.dspace.espol.edu.ec/handle/123456789/8375. Accessed 30 Nov 2010

  13. Steward N, Martin R, Engasser JM (1999) A new methodology for plant cell viability assessment using intracellular esterase activity. Plant Cell Rep 19:171–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carvell JP, Cannizzaro C (2007) On-line biomass monitoring in cell culture with scanning radio-frequency impedance spectroscopy. In: Smith R (ed) Cell technology for cell products. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wei N, Flaschel E, Friehs K et al (2008) A machine vision system for non-invasive assessment of cell viability via dark field microscopy, wavelet feature selection and classification. BMC Bioinformatics 9:449–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kranner I, Kastberger G, Hartbauer M et al (2010) Noninvasive diagnosis of seed viability using infrared thermography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:3912–3917

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Benthem R, de Grave W (2009) Turbidity sensor for bacterial growth measurements in spaceflight and simulated micro-gravity. Microgravity Sci Technol 21:349–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kodama M, Yoshida T, Otani H et al (1991) Effect of AL-toxin on viability of cultured tomato cells determined by the MTT colorimetric assay. In: Patil S (ed) Molecular strategies of pathogens and host plants. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vera-Estrella R, Blumwald E, Higgins VJ (1992) Effects of specific elicitors of Cladosporium fulvum on tomato suspension cells. Evidence for the involvement of active oxygen species. Plant Physiol 99:1208–1215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sánchez LM, Doke N, Kawakita K (1993) Elicitor induced chemiluminescence in cell suspension cultures of tomato, sweet pepper and tobacco plants and its inhibition by suppressors from Phytophthora spp. Plant Sci 88:141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Escobedo RM, Miranda-Ham ML (2003) Analysis of elicitor-induced cell viability changes in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. suspension culture by different methods. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 39:236–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Castro-Concha LA, Escobedo RM, Miranda-Ham ML (2006) Measurement of cell viability in in vitro cultures. In: Loyola-Vargas VM, Vázquez-Flota F (eds) Plant cell culture protocols. Humana, Totowa

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rivera-Madrid R, Escobedo-GM RM, Balam-Galera E et al (2006) Preliminary studies toward genetic improvement of annatto (Bixa orellana L). Sci Hortic 109:165–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dolcet-Sanjuan R, Claveria E, Huerta A (1997) Androgenesis in Capsicum annuum L.: effects of carbohydrate and carbon dioxide enrichment. J Am Soc Hort Sci 122:468–475

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rodríguez-Riano T, Dafni A (2000) A new procedure to asses pollen viability. Sex Plant Reprod 12:241–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Murashige T, Skoog FA (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res 50: 151–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María de Lourdes Miranda-Ham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Castro-Concha, L.A., Escobedo, R.M., de Lourdes Miranda-Ham, M. (2012). Measurement of Cell Viability. In: Loyola-Vargas, V., Ochoa-Alejo, N. (eds) Plant Cell Culture Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 877. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-818-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-818-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-817-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-818-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics