Abstract
This chapter reviews the current research on how protein domain architectures evolve. We begin by summarizing work on the phylogenetic distribution of proteins, as this directly impacts which domain architectures can be formed in different species. Studies relating domain family size to occurrence have shown that they generally follow power law distributions, both within genomes and larger evolutionary groups. These findings were subsequently extended to multidomain architectures. Genome evolution models that have been suggested to explain the shape of these distributions are reviewed, as well as evidence for selective pressure to expand certain domain families more than others. Each domain has an intrinsic combinatorial propensity, and the effects of this have been studied using measures of domain versatility or promiscuity. Next, we study the principles of protein domain architecture evolution and how these have been inferred from distributions of extant domain arrangements. Following this, we review inferences of ancestral domain architecture and the conclusions concerning domain architecture evolution mechanisms that can be drawn from these. Finally, we examine whether all known cases of a given domain architecture can be assumed to have a single common origin (monophyly) or have evolved convergently (polyphyly).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andreeva A, Howorth D, Chandonia JM, Brenner SE, Hubbard TJ, Chothia C and Murzin AG. (2008) Data growth and its impact on the SCOP database: new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 36(Database issue):D419–425.
Cuff AL, Sillitoe I, Lewis T, Redfern OC, Garratt R, Thornton J and Orengo CA. (2009) The CATH classification revisited--architectures reviewed and new ways to characterize structural divergence in superfamilies. Nucleic Acids Res. 37(Database issue):D310-314.
Wilson D, Pethica R, Zhou Y, Talbot C, Vogel C, Madera M, Chothia C and Gough J. (2009) SUPERFAMILY--sophisticated comparative genomics, data mining, visualization and phylogeny. Nucleic Acids Res. 37(Database issue):D380-386.
Lees J, Yeats C, Redfern O, Clegg A and Orengo C. (2010) Gene3D: merging structure and function for a Thousand genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 38(1):D296-D300.
Finn RD, Mistry J, Tate J, Coggill P, Heger A, Pollington JE, Gavin OL, Gunesekaran P, Ceric G, Forslund K, Holm L, Sonnhammer ELL, Eddy SR and Bateman A. (2010) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Research, Database Issue 38:D211–222.
Hunter S, Apweiler R, Attwood TK, Bairoch A, Bateman A, Binns D, Bork P, Das U, Daugherty L, Duquenne L, Finn RD, Gough J, Haft D, Hulo N, Kahn D, Kelly E, Laugraud A, Letunic I, Lonsdale D, Lopez R, Madera M, Maslen J, McAnulla C, McDowall J, Mistry J, Mitchell A, Mulder N, Natale D, Orengo C, Quinn AF, Selengut JD, Sigrist CJ, Thimma M, Thomas PD, Valentin F, Wilson D, Wu CH and Yeats C. (2009) InterPro: the integrative protein signature database. Nucleic Acids Res. 37(Database issue):D211-5
Marchler-Bauer A, Anderson JB, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, DeWeese-Scott C, Fong JH, Geer LY, Geer RC, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, He S, Hurwitz DI, Jackson JD, Ke Z, Lanczycki CJ, Liebert CA, Liu C, Lu F, Lu S, Marchler GH, Mullokandov M, Song JS, Tasneem A, Thanki N, Yamashita RA, Zhang D, Zhang N and Bryant SH. (2009) CDD: specific functional annotation with the Conserved Domain Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 37(Database issue):D205-210.
Letunic I, Doerks T and Bork P. (2009) SMART 6: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 37(Database issue):D229–232.
Bru C, Courcelle E, Carrère S, Beausse Y, Dalmar S and Kahn D. (2005) The ProDom database of protein domain families: more emphasis on 3D. Nucleic Acids Res. 33(Database issue):D212–215.
UniProt Consortium. (2010) The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) in 2010. Nucleic Acids Res. 38(Database issue):D142–148.
Heger A, Wilton CA, Sivakumar A and Holm L. (2005) ADDA: a domain database with global coverage of the protein universe. Nucleic Acids Res. 33(Database issue):D188–191.
Kummerfeld SK and Teichmann SA. (2009) Protein domain organisation:adding order. BMC Bioinformatics 10 (39). BioMed Central 2010.
Weiner J 3rd, Moore AD and Bornberg-Bauer E. (2008) Just how versatile are domains? BMC Evolutionary Biology 8(285).
del Carmen Orozco-Mosqueda M, Altamirano-Hernandez J, Farias-Rodriguez R, Valencia-Cantero E and Santoyo G. (2009) Homologous recombination and dynamics of rhizobial genomes. Research in Microbiology 160(10):733–741.
Heyer WD, Ehmsen KT, and Liu J. (2010) Regulation of Homologous Recombination in Eukaryotes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 44:113–139.
Brissett NC and Doherty AJ. (2009) Repairing DNA double-strand breaks by the prokaryotic non-homologous end-joining pathway. Biochemical Society Transactions 37:539–545.
van Rijk A and Bloemendal H. (2003) Molecular mechanisms of exon shuffling: illegitimate recombination. Genetica 118:245-249.
Feschotte C and Pritham EJ. (2007) DNA transposons and the evolution of eukaryotic genomes. Annu Rev Genet. 41:331-368.
Cordaux R and Batzer MA. (2009) The impact of retrotransposons on human genome evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics 10:691–703.
Gogvadze E and Buzdin A. (2009) Retroelements and their impact on genome evolution and functioning. Cell Mol Life Sci. 66(23):3727–3742.
Patthy L. (2003) Modular assembly of genes and the evolution of new functions. Genetica. 2003 Jul;118(2–3):217–31.
Liu M and Grigoriev A. (2004) Protein domains correlate strongly with exons in multiple eukaryotic genomes – evidence of exon shuffling? Trends Genet. 20(9):399–403.
Buljan M, Frankish A and Bateman A. (2010) Quantifying themechanisms of domain gain in animal proteins. Genome Biol. 11(7):R74.BioMed Central 2010.
Weiner J 3rd, Beaussart F and Bornberg-Bauer E. (2006) Domain deletions and substitutions in the modular protein evolution. FEBS Journal 273: 2037–2047.
Schmidt EE and Davies CJ. (2007) The origins of polypeptide domains. Bioessays. 29(3): 262–270.
Huynen MA and van Nimwegen E. (1998) The Frequency Distribution of Gene Family Sizes in Complete Genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15(5):583–589.
Qian J, Luscombe NM and Gerstein M (2001) Protein Family and Fold Occurrence in Genomes: Power-law Behaviour and Evolutionary Model. J. Mol. Biol. 313:673–681.
Luscombe NM, Qian J, Zhang Z, Johnson T and Gerstein M. (2002) The dominance of the population by a selected few: power-law behaviour applies to a wide variety of genomic properties. Genome Biol 3: RESEARCH0040.
Apic G, Gough J and Teichmann SA. (2001) Domain Combinations in Archaeal, Eubacterial and Eukaryotic Proteomes. J. Mol. Biol. 310:311–325.
Apic G, Huber W and Teichmann SA. (2003) Multi-domain protein families and domain pairs: comparison with known structures and a random model of domain recombination. Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics 4:67–78.
Vogel C, Berzuini C, Bashton M, Gough J and Teichmann SA. (2004) Supra-domains: Evolutionary Units Larger than Single Protein Domains. J. Mol. Biol. 336:809–823.
Karev GP, Wolf YI, Rzhetsky AY, Berezovskaya FS and Koonin EV. (2002) Birth and death of protein domains: a simple model of evolution explains power law behavior. BMC Evol Biol. 2(1):18.
Barabási AL and Albert R. (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science. 286(5439):509–512.
Wuchty S. (2001) Scale-free Behavior in Protein Domain Networks. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18(9):1694–1702.
Rzhetsky A and Gomez SM. (2001) Birth of scale-free molecular networks and the number of distinct DNA and protein domains per genome. Bioinformatics. 17(10):988–996.
Li L, Alderson D, Tanaka R, Doyle JC and Willinger W. (2005) Towards a Theory of Scale-Free Graphs: Definition, Properties, and Implications. Internet Mathematics 2 (4): 431–523.
Kuznetsov V, Pickalov V, Senko O and Knott G. (2002) Analysis of the evolving proteomes: Predictions of the number of protein domains in nature and the number of genes in eukaryotic organisms. J. Biol. Syst. 10(4):381–407.
Koonin EV, Wolf YI and Karev GP. (2002) The structure of the protein universe and genome evolution. Nature 420:218-223.
Yanai I, Camacho CJ and DeLisi C. (2000) Predictions of Gene Family Distributions in Microbial Genomes: Evolution by Gene Duplication and Modification. Phys. Rev. Let. 85(12):2641–2644.
van Nimwegen E. (2005) Scaling laws in the functional content of genomes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 74:867–900.
Ranea JAG, Buchan DWA, Thornton JM and Orengo CA (2004) Evolution of Protein Superfamilies and Bacterial Genome Size. J. Mol. Biol. 336:871–887.
Ranea JAG, Sillero A, Thornton JM, and Orengo CA. (2006) Protein superfamily evolution and the last universal common ancestor (LUCA). Journal of Molecular Evolution 63(4):513-525.
Chothia C and Gough J. (2009) Genomic and structural aspects of protein evolution. Biochem. J. 419:15–28.
Ekman D, Björklund ÅK and Elofsson A. (2007) Quantification of the Elevated Rate of Domain Rearrangements in Metazoa. J. Mol. Biol. 372:1337–1348.
Itoh M, Nacher JC, Kuma K, Goto S and Kanehisa M. (2007) Evolutionary history and functional implications of protein domains and their combinations in eukaryotes. Genome Biol. 8(6):R121.
Przytycka T, Davis G, Song N and Durand D. (2006) Graph theoretical insights into evolution of multidomain proteins. J Comput Biol. 13(2):351–363.
Marcotte EM, Pellegrini M, Ng HL, Rice DW, Yeates TO and Eisenberg D. (1999). Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. Science. 285(5428):751–753.
Basu MK, Carmel L, Rogozin IB, and Koonin EV. (2008) Evolution of protein domain promiscuity in eukaryotes. Genome Res. 18:449–461.
Basu MK, Poliakov E and Rogozin IB. (2009) Domain mobility in proteins: functional and evolutionary implications. Briefings in Bioinformatics 10(3):205–216.
Bashton M and Chothia C. (2002) The Geometry of Domain Combination in Proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 315:927–939.
Gough J. (2005) Convergent evolution of domain architectures (is rare). Bioinformatics 21(8):1464–1471.
Forslund K, Hollich V, Henricson A, and Sonnhammer ELL. (2008) Domain Tree Based Analysis of Protein Architecture Evolution MBE 25:254–264.
Brivanlou AH and Darnell JE. (2002) Signal Transduction and the Control of Gene Expression. Science 295(5556):813 – 818.
Weiner J 3rd and Bornberg-Bauer E. (2006) Evolution of Circular Permutations in Multidomain Proteins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23(4):734–743.
Tordai H, Nagy A, Farkas K, Bányai L, Patthy L. (2005) Modules, multidomain proteins and organismic complexity. FEBS J 272(19):5064–5078.
Vogel C, Teichmann SA and Pereira-Leal J. (2005) The Relationship Between Domain Duplication and Recombination. J. Mol. Biol. 346:355–365.
Björklund ÅK, Ekman D, Light S, Frey-Skött J and Elofsson A. (2005) Domain Rearrangements in Protein Evolution. J. Mol. Biol. 353:911–923.
Buljan M and Bateman A. (2009) The evolution of protein domain families. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 37:751–755.
Björklund ÅK, Ekman D and Elofsson A. (2006) Expansion of Protein Domain Repeats. PLoS Comput Biol 2(8):114.
Doolittle RD and Bork P (1993) Evolutionary mobile modules in proteins. Scient Am Oct:34–40.
Moore AD, Björklund ÅK, Ekman D, Bornberg-Bauer E and Elofsson A. (2008) Arrangements in the modular evolution of proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 33(9):444–151.
Farris JS. (1977). Phylogenetic analysis under Dollo s Law. Systematic Zoology 26: 77–88.
Snel B, Bork P and Huynen M. (2000) Genome evolution. Gene fusion versus gene fission. Trends Genet. 16(1):9–11.
Kummerfeld SK and Teichmann SA. (2005) Relative rates of gene fusion and fission in multi-domain proteins. Trends in Genetics 21(1):25–30.
Fong JH, Geer LY, Panchenko AR and Bryant SH. (2007) Modeling the Evolution of Protein Domain Architectures Using Maximum Parsimony. J Mol Biol. 366(1):307–315.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Forslund, K., Sonnhammer, E.L.L. (2012). Evolution of Protein Domain Architectures. In: Anisimova, M. (eds) Evolutionary Genomics. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 856. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-585-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-585-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-584-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-585-5
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols