Abstract
Among the many applications of molecular modeling, drug design is probably the one with the highest demands on the accuracy of the underlying structures. During lead optimization, the position of every atom in the binding site should ideally be known with high precision to identify those chemical modifications that are most likely to increase drug affinity. Unfortunately, X-ray crystallography at common resolution yields an electron density map that is too coarse, since the chemical elements and their protonation states cannot be fully resolved.
This chapter describes the steps required to fill in the missing knowledge, by devising an algorithm that can detect and resolve the ambiguities. First, the pK a values of acidic and basic groups are predicted. Second, their potential protonation states are determined, including all permutations (considering for example protons that can jump between the oxygens of a phosphate group). Third, those groups of atoms are identified that can adopt alternative but indistinguishable conformations with essentially the same electron density. Fourth, potential hydrogen bond donors and acceptors are located. Finally, all these data are combined in a single “configuration energy function,” whose global minimum is found with the SCWRL algorithm, which employs dead-end elimination and graph theory. As a result, one obtains a complete model of the protein and its bound ligand, with ambiguous groups rotated to the best orientation and with protonation states assigned considering the current pH and the H-bonding network. An implementation of the algorithm has been available since 2008 as part of the YASARA modeling & simulation program.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Nabuurs SB, Wagener M, de Vlieg J (2007) A flexible approach to induced fit docking. J.Med.Chem. 50: 6507–6518
Ishikita H, Stehlik D, Golbeck JH, Knapp EW (2006) Electrostatic influence of PsaC protein binding to the PsaA/PsaB heterodimer in photosystem I. Biophys. J. 90: 1081–1089
Hooft RWW, Sander C, Vriend G (1996) Positioning hydrogen atoms by optimizing hydrogen-bond networks in protein structures. Proteins 26: 363–376
Word JM, Lovell SC, Richardson JS, Richardson DC (1999) Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation. J.Mol.Biol. 285: 1735–1747
Grimsley GR, Scholtz JM, Pace CN A summary of the measured pK values of the ionizable groups in folded proteins. Protein Sci. 18: 247–251
Warwicker J (1999) Simplified methods for pKa and acid pH-dependent stability estimation in proteins: removing dielectric and counterion boundaries. Protein Sci. 8: 418–425
Sandberg L, Edholm O (1999) A fast and simple method to calculate protonation states in proteins. Proteins 36: 474–483
Warwicker J, Watson HC (1982) Calculation of the electric potential in the active site cleft due to alpha-helix dipoles. J.Mol.Biol. 157: 671–679
Yang AS, Gunner MR, Sampogna R, Sharp K, Honig B (1993) On the calculation of pKas in proteins. 15: 252–265
Antosiewicz J, McCammon JA, Gilson MK (1994) Prediction of pH-dependent properties of proteins. J.Mol.Biol. 238: 415–436
Czodrowski P, Dramburg I, Sotriffer CA, Klebe G (2006) Development, validation, and application of adapted PEOE charges to estimate pKa values of functional groups in protein-ligand complexes. Proteins 65: 424–437
Krieger E, Nielsen JE, Spronk CAEM, Vriend G (2006) Fast empirical pKa prediction by Ewald summation. J Mol Graph Model 25: 481–486
Bas DC, Rogers DM, Jensen JH (2008) Very fast prediction and rationalization of pKa values for protein-ligand complexes. Proteins 73: 765–783
Lee AC, Yu JY, Crippen GM (2008) pKa prediction of monoprotic small molecules the SMARTS way. J.Chem.Inf.Model. 48: 2043–2053
Cruciani G, Milletti F, Storchi L, Sforna G, Goracci L (2009) In silico pKa prediction and ADME profiling. Chem.Biodivers. 6: 1812–1821
Weichenberger CX, Sippl MJ (2006) NQ-Flipper: validation and correction of asparagine/glutamine amide rotamers in protein crystal structures. Bioinformatics 22: 1397–1398
Lippert T, Rarey M (2009) Fast automated placement of polar hydrogen atoms in protein-ligand complexes. J.Cheminform. 1: 13
Weininger D (1993) SMILES, a chemical language and information system. J.Chem.Inf.Comput.Sci 28: 31–36
Canutescu AA, Shelenkov AA, Dunbrack RLJ (2003) A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction. Protein Sci. 12: 2001–2014
Forrest LR, Honig B (2005) An assessment of the accuracy of methods for predicting hydrogen positions in protein structures. Proteins: 296–309
Duan Y, Wu C, Chowdhury S, Lee MC, Xiong G, Zhang W, Yang R, Cieplak P, Luo R, Lee T (2003) A Point-Charge Force Field for Molecular Mechanics Simulations of Proteins. J.Comp.Chem. 24: 1999–2012
Wang J, Wolf RM, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA, Case DA (2004) Development and testing of a general AMBER force field. J.Comp.Chem. 25: 1157–1174
Jakalian A, Jack DB, Bayly CI (2002) Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation. J.Comput.Chem. 23: 1623–1641
Wang J, Wang W, Kollman PA, Case DA (2006) Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations. J.Mol.Graph.Model. 25: 247–260
Dolinsky TJ, Czodrowski P, Li H, Nielsen JE, Jensen JH, Klebe G, Baker NA (2007) PDB2PQR: expanding and upgrading automated preparation of biomolecular structures for molecular simulations. Nucleic Acids Res. 35: W522-W525
Essman U, Perera L, Berkowitz ML, Darden T, Lee H, Pedersen LG (1995) A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J.Chem.Phys. 103: 8577–8593
Edgcomb SP, Murphy PM (2002) Variability in the pKa of histidine side-chains correlates with burial within proteins. Proteins 49: 1–6
Milletti F, Storchi L, Goracci L, Bendels S, Wagner B, Kansy M, Cruciani G (2010) Extending pKa prediction accuracy: high-throughput pKa measurements to understand pKa modulation of new chemical series. Eur.J.Med.Chem. 45: 4270–4279
Sippl MJ (1996) Helmholtz free energy of peptide hydrogen bonds in proteins. J.Mol.Biol. 260: 644–648
Connolly ML (1983) Analytical molecular surface calculation. J.Appl.Cryst. 16: 548–558
Hooft RWW, Vriend G, Sander C, Abola EE (1996) Errors in protein structures. Nature 381: 272–272
Nielsen JE, McCammon JA (2003) On the evaluation and optimization of protein X-ray structures for pKa calculations. Protein Sci. 12: 313–326
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the users of the molecular modeling and simulation program YASARA for financing this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Krieger, E., Dunbrack, R.L., Hooft, R.W.W., Krieger, B. (2012). Assignment of Protonation States in Proteins and Ligands: Combining pKa Prediction with Hydrogen Bonding Network Optimization. In: Baron, R. (eds) Computational Drug Discovery and Design. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 819. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-465-0_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-465-0_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-464-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-465-0
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols