Abstract
Advances in regenerative nanomedicine raise a host of ethical, legal, and social questions that healthcare providers and scientists will need to consider. These questions and concerns include definitions, appropriate applications, dual use, potential risks, regulations, and access. In this chapter, we provide an overview of the questions and concerns and recommend proactive consideration and solutions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Goss, R.J. (1992) The natural history (and mystery) of regeneration. In: Dinsmore CE (ed.). A History of Regeneration Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 7–23.
Sandler, R. (2009) Nanomedicine and nanomedical ethics, American Journal of Bioethics 9(10), 16–17.
: A new vision: A future for regenerative medicine, (2009) Department of Health and Human Services. Available at http://www.hhs.gov/reference/newfuture.shtml, last accessed October 23, 2009.
Daar, A.S., Greenwood, H.L. (2007) A proposed definition of regenerative medicine. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine,1, 179–84.
National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI). Available at http://www.nano.gov/html/about/home_about.html, http://www.nano.gov/html/facts/whatIsNano.html, http://www.nano.gov/Understanding_Risk_Assessment.pdf, last accessed November 9, 2009.
Alpert, S. (2008) Neuroethics and nanoethics: do we risk ethical myopia? Neuroethics 1(1), 55–68. Available at http://www.springerlink.com/content/v6352402k048qq53, last accessed November 6, 2009.
Lee, K.B., Solanki, A., Kim, J.D., and Jung, J. (2009) Nanomedicine: Dynamic Integration of Nanotechnology with Biomedical Science. In Zhang, M and Xi, N: Nanomedicine, a systems approach, Pan Stanford Publishing Pte Ltd.
Mooney, E., Dockery, P., Greiser, U., Murphy, M., Barron V. (2008) Carbon Nanotubes and Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Biocompatibility, Proliferation and Differentiation Nano Letters 8(8), 2137–2143.
Stocum, D.L. (2009) Regenerative Biology and Medicine, Elsevier Press, San Diego, 28
Stem Cell Information. Bethesda, M.D: National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department f Health and Human Services, November 06, 2009. Available at: http://stemcells.nih.gov/info/basics/basics10, last accessed November 9, 2009.
Wang, Z., Ruan, J., Cui, D. (2009) Advances and prospect of nanotechnology in stem cells. Nanoscale Res Letters, 4(7), 593–605.
Garibaldi, S., Brunelli, C., Bavastrello, V., Ghigliotti, G., Nicolini, C. (2006) Carbon nanotube biocomptibility with cardiac muscle cells, Nanotech 17, 391–397.
Panagiotis, G.K., Lehtolainen, P., Junemann-Ramirez, M., Garcia-Prieto, A., Price, A., Martin, J.F., Gadian, D.G., Pankhurst, A.Q., Lythgoe, M.F. (2009) Magnetic tagging increases delivery of circulating progenitors in vascular injury. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, 2(8), 794.
Traphagen, S., Yelick, P.C. (2009) Reclaiming a natural beauty: whole-organ engineering with natural extracellular materials, Regenerative Medicine, 4(5), 747–758
Chang,W.C., Kliot, M., Sretavan, D.W. (2008) Microtechnology and nanotechnology in nerve repair, Neurol Res. 30, 10, 1053–62.
Gravitz, L. (2009) Laser Show in the Surgical Suite, Technology Review, March/April 2009, MIT Press, available at http://www.technologyreview.com/biomedicine/22088/, last accessed October 25, 2009.
Guo, J., Su, H., Zeng, Y., Liang, Y.X., Wong, W.M., Ellis-Behnke, R.G., So, K.F., Wu, W. (2007) Reknitting the injured spinal cord by self-assembling peptide nanofiber scaffold, Nanomedicine, 3(4), 311–21.
Science Daily, Nanoparticle-based Erectile Dysfunction Therapy Shows Promise, Sept. 20, 2009. Available at http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/09/090918181456.htm, last accessed October 30, 2009.
Woodrow Wilson Report, Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. Available at http://www.nanotech-project.us/process/assets/files/2741/18_nanotechnologyhumanhealthimpactframeworkstrategicresearch.pdf, last accessed November 9, 2009.
United States Code of Federal Regulations, Part 312 and 314.
Jotterand, F. (Ed) (2009) Emerging Conceptual, Ethical, and Policy Issues in Bionanotechnology, 2009, Springer, 183–192.
U.S. Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1962 Section 201 (f).
White, G.B. (2009) Missing the Boat on Nanoethics. The American Journal of Bioethics, 9(10), 18–19. Available at http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/15265160903162642, last accessed November 08, 2009
Note 1: Jesse Gelsinger was an 18 year old patient who participated in a gene therapy trial for Ornithine transcarboxylase deficiency (OTCD); he died from multiple organ failure 4 days after starting treatment. His death was believed to have been triggered by a severe immune response to the adenovirus carrier and was a major setback in gene therapy. Available at http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/medicine/genetherapy.shtml, last accessed November 08, 2009
Allhoff, F., Lin, P. (2008) Nanotechnology & Society: Current and Emerging Ethical Issues. (Dordrecht: Springer).
Schmidt, C.W. (2009) Nanotechnology-related environment, health, and safety research: examining the national strategy. Environ Health Perspect,117(4), A158–61. Available at http://www.ehponline.org/members/2009/117-4/EHP117pa158PDF.PDF, last accessed November 4, 2009.
Note 2: The Asilomar Conference on Recombinant DNA was an influential conference organized to discuss the potential hazards and regulation of biotechnology, held in February 1975 at a conference center Asilomar State Beach. A group of around 140 professionals participated in the conference to draw up voluntary guidelines to ensure the safety of recombinant DNA technology. Available at http://www.wikidoc.org/index.php/Asilomar_conference_on_recombinant_DNA last accessed August 25, 2010.
Fredrickson, D.S. (2001) The recombinant DNA controversy: A memoir: science, politics, and the public interest 1974–1981. Washington, D.C.: ASM Press.
Paradise, J. (2008) Developing oversight frameworks for nanobiotechnology. Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 9(1), 399–416.
Kristof, N. (2009) Chemicals and our health, New York Times, July 15, 2009, available at http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/16/opinion/16kristof.html?_r=2&ref=opinion, last accessed November 5, 2009
Diamanti-Kandarakis, E., Bourguignon, J.P., Giudice, L.C., Hauser, R., Prins, G.S., Soto, A.M., Zoeller, R.T., Gore, A.C. (2009) Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: an Endocrine Society scientific statement. Endocr Rev. 30(4), 293–342.
Jones, O.A.H., Voulvoulis, N., Lester, J.N. (2001) Human pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment: a review. Environ Technol 22, 1383–1395.
Stem Cell Information. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2009, Available at http://stemcells.nih.gov/info/scireport/2006chapter6, last accessed October 23, 2009
Munn, D. (2001) Moral Issues of Human Embryo Research. Science 293, 211.
Pellegrino, E. (2000) Testimony, in National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Ethical Issues in Human Stem Cell Research, vol. III (Washington: NBAC, 2000), F-1-F-5.
Guenin, L. (2001) Morals and Primordials. Science 292, 1659–1660. Available at http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/292/5522/1659, last accessed November 6, 2009.
Brannigan, M.C. (2001) What if we assign moral status to human embryos? Genetic Eng News 12, 6.
Chan, S., Harris, J. (2008) Adam’s fibroblast? The (pluri)potential of iPCs. J MedEthics. 34 (2), 64–6.
Glenn, L.M. (2003) Biotechnology at the margins of personhood: An evolving legal paradigm, Journal of Evolution and Technology, 13, 110.
Ellis-Behnke, R.G., Liang, Y.X., You, S.W., Tay, D.K., Zhang, S., So, K.F., Schneider, G.E. (2006) Nano neuro knitting: peptide nanofiber scaffold for brain repair and axon regeneration with functional return of vision. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 103(13), 5054–9.
Sclabassi, R.J. (2009) Brain Implantable Computer Platforms, Presentation at Unither Technology Conference, Magog, Quebec. Available at http://www.unithertechnologyconference.com/downloads09/SessionsDayOne/SCLABASSI_web.pdf, last accessed November 6, 2009
Kurzweil, R. (2005) The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology, Viking Press.
Glenn, L.M. (2003) Biotechnology at the margins of personhood: An evolving legal paradigm, Journal of Evolution and Technology, 13, 110.
Glenn, L.M., Boyce, J.S. (2008) Nanotechnology: Considering the Complex Ethical, Legal, and Societal Issues with Parameters of Human Performance, Nanoethics, 2, 265–275.
McGee, E. (2009) Nanomedicine: Ethical concerns beyond diagnostics, drugs, and techniques. American Journal of Bioethics, 9(10), 14–15.
McKibben, B. (2003) Enough: Staying human in an engineered age, Times Books, New York.
McGee, E., (2007) Should there be a law: Brain chips: Ethical and policy issues. Thomas M. Cooley Law Review, 24(1), 81–97.
Jotterand, F. (2008) Beyond Therapy and Enhancement: The Alteration of Human Nature, NanoEthics, 2, 15–23
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Glenn, L.M., Boyce, J.S. (2012). Regenerative Nanomedicine: Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues. In: Navarro, M., Planell, J. (eds) Nanotechnology in Regenerative Medicine. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 811. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-388-2_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-388-2_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-387-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-388-2
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols