Molecular Assays to Investigate Chromatin Changes During DNA Double-Strand Break Repair in Yeast

  • Scott Houghtaling
  • Toyoko Tsukuda
  • Mary Ann OsleyEmail author
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 745)


Multiple types of DNA damage, including bulky adducts, DNA single-strand breaks, and DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), have deleterious effects on the genomes of eukaryotes. DSBs form normally during a variety of biological processes, such as V–D–J recombination and yeast mating type switching, but unprogrammed DSBs are among the most dangerous types of lesion because if left unrepaired they can lead to loss of genetic material or chromosomal rearrangements. The presence of DSBs leads to a DNA damage response involving activation of cell cycle checkpoints, recruitment of repair proteins, and chromatin remodeling. Because many of the proteins that mediate these processes are evolutionarily conserved, the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, has been used as a model organism to investigate the factors involved in the response to DSBs. Recent research on DSB repair has focused on the barrier that chromatin represents to the repair process. In this article, we describe molecular techniques available to analyze chromatin architecture near a defined DSB in budding yeast. These techniques may be of value to experimentalists who are investigating the role of a novel protein in DSB repair specifically in the context of chromatin.

Key words

DNA double-strand break repair yeast chromatin nucleosome remodeling 



Supported by grants NIH CA118357 to M.A.O. and NIH F32 CA125955 to S.H.


  1. 1.
    Haber, J.E. (2000) Partners and pathways repairing a double-strand break. Trends Genet 16, 259–264.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Daley, J.M., Palmbos, P.L., Wu, D., and Wilson, T.E. (2005) Nonhomologous end joining in yeast. Annu Rev Genet 39, 431–451.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lewis, L.K., and Resnick, M.A. (2000) Tying up loose ends: nonhomologous end-joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res 451, 71–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mimitou, E.P., and Symington, L.S. (2009) DNA end resection: many nucleases make light work. DNA Repair (Amst) 8, 983–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heyer, W.D., Li, X., Rolfsmeier, M., and Zhang, X.P. (2006) Rad54: the Swiss Army knife of homologous recombination? Nucleic Acids Res 34, 4115–4125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luger, K., Mader, A.W., Richmond, R.K., Sargent, D.F., and Richmond, T.J. (1997) Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature 389, 251–260.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krogh, B.O., and Symington, L.S. (2004) Recombination proteins in yeast. Annu Rev Genet 38, 233–271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Downs, J.A. (2007) Chromatin structure and DNA double-strand break responses in cancer progression and therapy. Oncogene 26, 7765–7772.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rogakou, E.P., Pilch, D.R., Orr, A.H., Ivanova, V.S., and Bonner, W.M. (1998) DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J Biol Chem 273, 5858–5868.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shroff, R., Arbel-Eden, A., Pilch, D., Ira, G., Bonner, W.M., Petrini, J.H., Haber, J.E., and Lichten, M. (2004) Distribution and dynamics of chromatin modification induced by a defined DNA double-strand break. Curr Biol 14, 1703–1711.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bird, A.W., Yu, D.Y., Pray-Grant, M.G., Qiu, Q., Harmon, K.E., Megee, P.C., Grant, P.A., Smith, M.M., and Christman, M.F. (2002) Acetylation of histone H4 by Esa1 is required for DNA double-strand break repair. Nature 419, 411–415.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Utley, R.T., Lacoste, N., Jobin-Robitaille, O., Allard, S., and Cote, J. (2005) Regulation of NuA4 histone acetyltransferase activity in transcription and DNA repair by phosphorylation of histone H4. Mol Cell Biol 25, 8179–8190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Osley, M.A., Tsukuda, T., and Nickoloff, J.A. (2007) ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factors and DNA damage repair. Mutat Res 618, 65–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chai, B., Huang, J., Cairns, B.R., and Laurent, B.C. (2005) Distinct roles for the RSC and Swi/Snf ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers in DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev 19, 1656–1661.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Downs, J.A., Allard, S., Jobin-Robitaille, O., Javaheri, A., Auger, A., Bouchard, N., Kron, S.J., Jackson, S.P., and Cote, J. (2004) Binding of chromatin-modifying activities to phosphorylated histone H2A at DNA damage sites. Mol Cell 16, 979–990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kent, N.A., Chambers, A.L., and Downs, J.A. (2007) Dual chromatin remodeling roles for RSC during DNA double strand break induction and repair at the yeast MAT locus. J Biol Chem 282, 27693–27701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liang, B., Qiu, J., Ratnakumar, K., and Laurent, B.C. (2007) RSC functions as an early double-strand-break sensor in the cell’s response to DNA damage. Curr Biol 17, 1432–1437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Morrison, A.J., Highland, J., Krogan, N.J., Arbel-Eden, A., Greenblatt, J.F., Haber, J.E., and Shen, X. (2004) INO80 and gamma-H2AX interaction links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling to DNA damage repair. Cell 119, 767–775.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tsukuda, T., Fleming, A.B., Nickoloff, J.A., and Osley, M.A. (2005) Chromatin remodelling at a DNA double-strand break site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 438, 379–383.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    van Attikum, H., Fritsch, O., and Gasser, S.M. (2007) Distinct roles for SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodeling complexes at chromosomal double-strand breaks. EMBO J 26, 4113–4125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tsukuda, T., Lo, Y.C., Krishna, S., Sterk, R., Osley, M.A., and Nickoloff, J.A. (2009) INO80-dependent chromatin remodeling regulates early and late stages of mitotic homologous recombination. DNA Repair (Amst) 8, 360–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee, S.E., Moore, J.K., Holmes, A., Umezu, K., Kolodner, R.D., and Haber, J.E. (1998) Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 94, 399–409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sugawara, N., and Haber, J.E. (2006) Repair of DNA double strand breaks: in vivo biochemistry. Methods Enzymol 408, 416–429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Baudin, A., Ozier-Kalogeropoulos, O., Denouel, A., Lacroute, F., and Cullin, C. (1993) A simple and efficient method for direct gene deletion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 21, 3329–3330.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gietz, R.D., and Woods, R.A. (2002) Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. Methods Enzymol 350, 87–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Janke, C., Magiera, M.M., Rathfelder, N., Taxis, C., Reber, S., Maekawa, H., Moreno-Borchart, A., Doenges, G., Schwob, E., Schiebel, E., and Knop, M. (2004) A versatile toolbox for PCR-based tagging of yeast genes: new fluorescent proteins, more markers and promoter substitution cassettes. Yeast 21, 947–962.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fleming, A.B., and Pennings, S. (2001) Antagonistic remodelling by Swi-Snf and Tup1-Ssn6 of an extensive chromatin region forms the background for FLO1 gene regulation. EMBO J 20, 5219–5231.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee, W., Tillo, D., Bray, N., Morse, R.H., Davis, R.W., Hughes, T.R., and Nislow, C. (2007) A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast. Nat Genet 39, 1235–1244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nedospasov, S.A., and Georgiev, G.P. (1980) Non-random cleavage of SV40 DNA in the compact minichromosome and free in solution by micrococcal nuclease. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 92, 532–539.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ravindra, A., Weiss, K., and Simpson, R.T. (1999) High-resolution structural analysis of chromatin at specific loci: Saccharomyces cerevisiae silent mating-type locus HMRa. Mol Cell Biol 19, 7944–7950.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Weiss, K., and Simpson, R.T. (1998) High-resolution structural analysis of chromatin at specific loci: Saccharomyces cerevisiae silent mating type locus HMLα. Mol Cell Biol 18, 5392–5403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wu, C. (1980) The 5 ends of Drosophila heat shock genes in chromatin are hypersensitive to DNase I. Nature 286, 854–860.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shim, E.Y., Hong, S.J., Oum, J.H., Yanez, Y., Zhang, Y., and Lee, S.E. (2007) RSC mobilizes nucleosomes to improve accessibility of repair machinery to the damaged chromatin. Mol Cell Biol 27, 1602–1613.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kuo, M.H., and Allis, C.D. (1999) In vivo cross-linking and immunoprecipitation for studying dynamic protein:DNA associations in a chromatin environment. Methods 19, 425–433.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tsukuda, T., Trujillo, K.M., Martini, E., and Osley, M.A. (2009) Analysis of chromatin remodeling during formation of a DNA double-strand break at the yeast mating type locus. Methods 48, 40–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chen, C.C., Carson, J.J., Feser, J., Tamburini, B., Zabaronick, S., Linger, J., and Tyler, J.K. (2008) Acetylated lysine 56 on histone H3 drives chromatin assembly after repair and signals for the completion of repair. Cell 134, 231–243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jiang, C., and Pugh, B.F. (2009) A compiled and systematic reference map of nucleosome positions across the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Genome Biol 10, R109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott Houghtaling
    • 1
  • Toyoko Tsukuda
    • 1
  • Mary Ann Osley
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Molecular Genetics and MicrobiologyUniversity of New Mexico School of MedicineAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations