Advertisement

Methods to Study Mitotic Homologous Recombination and Genome Stability

  • Xiuzhong Zheng
  • Anastasiya Epstein
  • Hannah L. KleinEmail author
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 745)

Abstract

Spontaneous mitotic recombination occurs in response to DNA damage incurred during DNA replication or from lesions that do not block replication but leave recombinogenic substrates such as single-stranded DNA gaps. Other types of damages result in general genome instability such as chromosome loss, chromosome fragmentation, and chromosome rearrangements. The genome is kept intact through recombination, repair, replication, checkpoints, and chromosome organization functions. Therefore when these pathways malfunction, genomic instabilities occur. Here we outline some general strategies to monitor a subset of the genomic instabilities: spontaneous mitotic recombination and chromosome loss, in both haploid and diploid cells. The assays, while not inclusive of all genome instability assays, give a broad assessment of general genome damage or inability to repair damage in various genetic backgrounds.

Key words

Genomic instability gene conversion chromosome loss mitotic recombination cell division 

References

  1. 1.
    Kolodner, R.D., Putnam, C.D., and Myung, K. (2002) Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 297, 552–557.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Basrai, M.A. and Hieter, P. (1995) Is there a unique form of chromatin at the Saccharomyces cerevisiae centromeres? Bioessays 17, 669–672.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crouse, G.F. (2000) Mutagenesis assays in yeast. Methods 22, 116–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dion, B. and Brown, G.W. (2009) Comparative genome hybridization on tiling microarrays to detect aneuploidies in yeast. Methods Mol Biol 548, 1–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gordenin, D.A. and Resnick, M.A. (1998) Yeast ARMs (DNA at-risk motifs) can reveal sources of genome instability. Mutat Res 400, 45–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Motegi, A. and Myung, K. (2007) Measuring the rate of gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a practical approach to study genomic rearrangements observed in cancer. Methods 41, 168–176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lea, D.E. and Coulson, C.A. (1948) The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations. J Genet 49, 264–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Merker, R.J. and Klein, H.L. (2002) hpr1Delta affects ribosomal DNA recombination and cell life span in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 22, 421–429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davis, A.P. and Symington, L.S. (2004) RAD51-dependent break-induced replication in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 24, 2344–2351.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiuzhong Zheng
    • 1
  • Anastasiya Epstein
    • 1
  • Hannah L. Klein
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of BiochemistryNew York University School of MedicineNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations