Advertisement

A 1D-PAGE/LC-ESI Linear Ion Trap Orbitrap MS Approach for the Analysis of Synapse Proteomes and Synaptic Protein Complexes

  • Ning Chen
  • Roel C. vd Schors
  • August B. SmitEmail author
Protocol
Part of the Neuromethods book series (NM, volume 57)

Abstract

The 1D-PAGE/LC-ESI MS/MS approach is widely used for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of proteomes ranging from low to high complexity. As the first dimension of separation is based on SDS-PAGE, this method is compatible with the analysis of all classes of proteins including hydrophobic membrane proteins and proteins with extreme pI. 1D PAGE has the possibility to reduce protein complexity by cutting the sample gel lane into a large number of slices. The second dimension of separation is reverse phase C18 chromatography, which is coupled online to an ESI Linear Ion Trap Orbitrap MS. In this configuration the MS spectra are taken at high resolution in the Orbitrap, which improves the confidence of peptide identification. In parallel, the MS/MS spectra are generated by the Linear Ion Trap with high sensitivity, which allows the interrogation of larger numbers of peptides and thus yields improved protein identification in a given period of time.

Key words

SDS-PAGE Proteomics LC-MS/MS Orbitrap Synapse 

References

  1. 1.
    Bayes, A., and Grant, S. G. (2009) Neuroproteomics: understanding the molecular organization and complexity of the brain, Nat Rev Neurosci 10, 635–646.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li, K. W., and Jimenez, C. R. (2008) Synapse proteomics: current status and quantitative applications, Expert review of proteomics 5, 353–360.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li, K. W., Klemmer, P., and Smit, A. B. (2010) Interaction proteomics of synapse protein complexes, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 397, 3195–3202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klemmer, P., Smit, A. B., and Li, K. W. (2009) Proteomics analysis of immuno-precipitated synaptic protein complexes, Journal of proteomics 72, 82–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li, K. W., Jimenez, C. R., van der Schors, R. C., Hornshaw, M. P., Schoffelmeer, A. N., and Smit, A. B. (2006) Intermittent administration of morphine alters protein expression in rat nucleus accumbens, Proteomics 6, 2003–2008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Choudhary, C., and Mann, M. Decoding signalling networks by mass spectrometry-based proteomics, Nature reviews 11, 427–439.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yates, J. R., Cociorva, D., Liao, L., and Zabrouskov, V. (2006) Performance of a linear ion trap-Orbitrap hybrid for peptide analysis, Analytical chemistry 78, 493–500.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mineki, R., Taka, H., Fujimura, T., Kikkawa, M., Shindo, N., and Murayama, K. (2002) In situ alkylation with acrylamide for identification of cysteinyl residues in proteins during one- and two-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, Proteomics 2, 1672–1681.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Atrih, A., Turnock, D., Sellar, G., Thompson, A., Feuerstein, G., Ferguson, M. A., and Huang, J. T. (2010) Stoichiometric quantification of Akt phosphorylation using LC-MS/MS, Journal of proteome research 9, 743–751.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive ResearchVU UniversityAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations