Detection of Bacterial Signaling Molecules in Liquid or Gaseous Environments
The detection of bacterial signaling molecules in liquid or gaseous environments has been occurring in nature for billions of years. More recently, man-made materials and systems has also allowed for the detection of small molecules in liquid or gaseous environments. This chapter will outline some examples of these man-made detection systems by detailing several acoustic-wave sensor systems applicable to quorum sensing. More importantly though, a comparison will be made between existing bacterial quorum sensing signaling systems, such as the Vibrio harveyi two-component system and that of man-made detection systems, such as acoustic-wave sensor systems and digital communication receivers similar to those used in simple cell phone technology.
It will be demonstrated that the system block diagrams for either bacterial quorum sensing systems or man-made detection systems are all very similar, and that the established modeling techniques for digital communications and acoustic-wave sensors can also be transformed to quorum sensing systems.
Key wordsAcoustic wave biosensors State-space mapping RFID/biosensors Chemically orthogonal antibodies Antibody promiscuity Vibrio harveyi two-component model
- 1.Stubbs, D. D., Hunt, W. D., and Edmonson, P. J. Acoustic Wave Biosensor for The Detection and Identification of Characteristic Signaling Molecules in A Biological Medium, US Patent No. US 7,651,843 B2, issued January 26, 2010.Google Scholar
- 2.Van Trees, H. L. (1968) Detection, esti mation, and modulation theory, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
- 3.Wozencraft, J. M., and Jacobs, I. M. (1965) Principles of communication engineering, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
- 11.Campbell, C. (1998) Surface acoustic wave devices for mobile and wireless communications, Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
- 17.Edmonson, P. J., and Campbell, C. K. (1992) SAW-based carrier recovery without phase ambiguity for 915 MHz BPSK wireless digital communications, in IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, pp 241–244, Tucson, AZ.Google Scholar
- 18.Auld, B. A. (1990) Acoustic fields and waves in solids, 2nd ed., R.E. Krieger, Malabar, FL.Google Scholar
- 20.Edmonson, P. J., Hunt, W. D., Corso, C. D., Dickherber, A., and Csete, M. E. An acoustic wave sensor assembly utilizing a multi-element structure, United States Patent Application No.11/822045 filed July 2, 2007.Google Scholar
- 22.Corso, C. D., Dickherber, A., Hunt, W. D., and Edmonson, P. J. (2008) Passive sensor networks based on multi-element ladder filter structures, pp 538–541, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
- 23.Edmonson, P. J., and Hunt, W. D. Sensing systems utilizing acoustic wave devices, US Patent No. US 7,608,978 B2, issued October 27, 2009.Google Scholar
- 24.Edmonson, P. J., Campbell, C. K., and Hunt, W. D. A surface acoustic wave sensor or identification device with biosensing capability, United States Patent No. 7,053,524 B2 issued May 30, 2006.Google Scholar