Abstract
The nuclear pore complex (NPC) is the sole mediator of transport between the nucleus and the cytoplasm. The NPC is composed of about 30 distinct proteins, termed nucleoporins or nups. The yeast (Rout et al., J Cell Biol 148:635–651, 2000) and mammalian (Cronshaw et al., J Cell Biol 158:915–927, 2002) NPC have been extensively studied. However, the two species are relatively closely related. Thus, to reveal details about NPC evolution, we chose to characterize the NPC of a distantly related organism, Trypanosoma brucei. We took a subcellular proteomic approach and used several complementary strategies to identify 865 proteins associated with the nuclear envelope. Over 50% of ∼8,100 open reading frames of T. brucei have little or no known function because T. brucei is distantly related to model metazoa and fungi (Berriman et al., Science 309:416–422, 2005). By sequence similarity alone, we could identify only five nucleoporins. This chapter outlines our strategy to identify 17 additional nucleoporins as well as contribute functional annotation data to the T. brucei genome database.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Rout MP, Aitchison JD, Suprapto A, Hjertaas K, Zhao YM, Chait BT. (2000) The yeast nuclear pore complex: Composition, architecture, and transport mechanism. The Journal of Cell Biology; 148:635–51.
Cronshaw JA, Krutchinsky AN, Zhang WZ, Chait BT, Matunis MJ. (2002) Proteomic analysis of the mammalian nuclear pore complex. The Journal of Cell Biology; 158:915–27.
Berriman M, Ghedin E, Hertz-Fowler C, et al. (2005) The genome of the African trypanosome Trypanosoma brucei. Science; 309:416–22.
Atwood JA, Weatherly DB, Minning TA, et al. (2005) The Trypanosoma cruzi proteome. Science; 309:473–6.
McHugh L, Arthur JW. (2008) Computational methods for protein identification from mass spectrometry data. PLoS Computational Biology; 4:e12.
Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research; 25:3389–402.
Pearson WR, Lipman DJ. (1988) Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America; 85:2444–8.
Eddy SR. (1998) Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics; 14:755–63.
Kall L, Krogh A, Sonnhammer ELL. (2004) A combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction method. Journal of Molecular Biology; 338:1027–36.
Ward JJ, Sodhi JS, McGuffin LJ, Buxton BF, Jones DT. (2004) Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. Journal of Molecular Biology; 337:635–45.
Lupas A, Vandyke M, Stock J. (1991) Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences. Science; 252:1162–4.
Hawkins J, Davis L, Boden M. (2007) Predicting nuclear localization. Journal of Proteome Research; 6:1402–9.
McGuffin LJ, Bryson K, Jones DT. (2000) The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics; 16:404–5.
Soding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. (2005) The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Research; 33:W244–8.
Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, et al. (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics; 23:2947–8.
Rout MP, Field MC. (2001) Isolation and characterization of subnuclear compartments from Trypanosoma brucei – Identification of a major repetitive nuclear lamina component. Journal of Biological Chemistry; 276:38261–71.
DeGrasse JA, Chait BT, Field MC, Rout MP. High-yield isolation and subcellular proteomic characterization of nuclear and subnuclear structures from trypanosomes. In: Hancock R, ed. Methods in Molecular Biology: The Nucleus. New York: Humana Press; 2008:77–92.
Bateman A, Birney E, Durbin R, Eddy SR, Howe KL, Sonnhammer ELL. (2000) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Research; 28:263–6.
Finn RD, Tate J, Mistry J, et al. (2008) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Research; 36:D281–8.
Fenyö D, Zhang W, Beavis RC, Chait BT. (1996) Internet-based analytical chemistry resources – a model project. Analytical Chemistry; 68:A721–6.
Devos D, Dokudovskaya S, Williams R, et al. (2006) Simple fold composition and modular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America; 103:2172–7.
Devos D, Dokudovskaya S, Alber F, et al. (2004) Components of coated vesicles and nuclear pore complexes share a common molecular architecture. PLoS Biology; 2:e380.
DeGrasse JA, DuBois KN, Devos D, Siegel TN, Sali A, Field MC, Rout MP, Chait BT. (2010) Evidence for a Shared Nuclear Pore Complex Architecture That Is Conserved from the Last Common Eukaryotic Ancestor. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics; 8:2119–30.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge Brian T. Chait, Mark C. Field, Michael P. Rout, and Andrej Sali for the helpful advice and discussions. The work was supported by the Training Program in Chemical Biology (JAD).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
DeGrasse, J.A., Devos, D. (2010). A Functional Proteomic Study of the Trypanosoma brucei Nuclear Pore Complex: An Informatic Strategy. In: Fenyö, D. (eds) Computational Biology. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 673. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-842-3_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-842-3_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-60761-841-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-60761-842-3
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols