Skip to main content

The Sheep Erythrocyte T-Dependent Antibody Response (TDAR)

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Book cover Immunotoxicity Testing

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology™ ((MIMB,volume 598))

Abstract

The sheep erythrocyte T-dependent antibody Response (TDAR) evaluates the ability of animals sensitized in vivo to produce primary IgM antibodies to sheep erythrocytes (sRBC). The assay enumerates the number of antigen specific IgM antibody producing cells in the spleen. When exposure to the test material takes place in vivo, as does sensitization, the actual quantification of the number of antibody producing cells occurs ex vivo. Following the animal being euthanized, a single cell suspension of spleen cells is prepared. These spleen cells containing the IgM secreting plasma cells are incubated in a semisolid matrix of agar, sheep erythrocytes, and guinea pig serum as a single cell layer between a Petri dish and glass cover slip. After a 3 h incubation period, lysis of sRBCs around each of the IgM secreting antigen specific plasma cells results in the formation of a clear plaque, which can easily be counted. The TDAR has been found to be the most sensitive functional assay for evaluating effects on the immune system, particularly the humoral immune component. The TDAR to sheep erythrocytes still remains the gold standard for evaluating the potential adverse effects of xenobiotics on the immune system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jerne NK, Nordin AA, Henry C (1963) The agar plaque technique for recognizing antibody-producing cells. In: Amos B, Koprowski H (eds) Cell-bound antibodies. Wistar Institute Press, Philadelphia, PA, pp 109–125

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hubner KF, Gengozian N (1968) Critical variables of the Jerne plaque technique as applied to rodent antibody-forming systems responding to heterologous red cell antigens. J Immunol 102:155–167

    Google Scholar 

  3. Luster MI, Munson AE, Thomas PT, Holsapple MP, Fenters JD, White KL Jr, Lauer LD, Germolec DR, Rosenthal GJ, Dean JH (1988) Development of a testing battery to assess chemical-induced immunotoxicity: National Toxicology Program’s guidelines for immunotoxicity evaluation in mice. Fundam Appl Toxicol 10:2–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. White KL Jr, Gennings C, Murray MJ, Dean JH (1994) Summary of an international methods validation study, carried out in nine laboratories, on the immunological assessment of cyclosporine A in the Fischer 344 rat. Toxicol In Vitro 8:957–961

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dayan AD, Kuper F, Madsen C, Smialowicz RJ, Smith E, Van Loveren H, Vos JG, White KL Jr (1998) Report of validation study of assessment of direct immunotoxicity in the rat. Toxicology 125:183–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Loveless SE, Ladics GS, Smith C, Holsapple MP, Woolhiser MR, White KL Jr, Musgrove DL, Smialowicz RJ, Williams W (2007) Interlaboratory study of the primary antibody response to sheep redblood cells in outbred rodents following exposure to cyclophosphamide or dexamethasome. J Immunotoxicol 4(3):233–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Temple L, Kawabata TT, Munson AE, White KL Jr (1993) Comparison of ELISA and plaque-forming cell assay for measuring the humoral immune response to SRBC in animals treated with benzo(a)pyrene or cyclophosphamide. Fundam Appl Toxicol 21:412–419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith HW, Winstead CJ, Stank KK, Halstead BW, Wierda D (2003) A predictive F344 rat immunotoxicology model: cellular parameters combined with humoral response to NP-CγG and KLH. Toxicology 194:129–145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gore ER, Gower J, Kurali E, Sui JL, Bynum J, Ennulat D, Herzyk D (2004) Primary antibody response to keyhole limpet hemocyanin in rat as a model for immunotoxicity evaluation. Toxicology 197:23–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. White KL Jr, Sheth CM, Peachee VL (2007) Comparison of primary immune responses to SRBC and KLH in rodents. J Immunotoxicol 4(2):153–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported in part by NIEHS Contract ES 05454.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimber L. White .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

White, K.L., Musgrove, D.L., Brown, R.D. (2010). The Sheep Erythrocyte T-Dependent Antibody Response (TDAR). In: Dietert, R. (eds) Immunotoxicity Testing. Methods in Molecular Biology™, vol 598. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-401-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-401-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60761-400-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60761-401-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics