Abstract
Definable, genetically and environmentally, the humble mouse has become a reagent with which to probe the human condition. The information thus gained is leading to a greater understanding of inter-individual variation in drug responses and disease processes and is forming the basis for personalized medicine. Inbred mice are the tool of choice as each strain is essentially clonal in nature creating a defined, uniform setting where the effects of genetic background and modifications can be evaluated coherently. However, the creation and characterization of novel mouse strains remain expensive and time consuming. Further, the continual maintenance of these valuable animals as live colonies is financially draining and carries continual potential risks, including disastrous loss due to fire, flood, disease, etc. There are also other more insidious disasters including genetic contamination and genetic drift, either of which can go undiscovered until their effects ruin experiments. With this in mind, we strongly recommend that all mouse strains be cryopreserved as a matter of standard mouse management. Cryopreservation is a powerful colony management tool, assuring strains are available upon demand, for example, for regulatory requirements, re-initiation of projects, collaborations, re-evaluation of data etc. However, it is essential that any cryopreservation approach be cost-effective for both strain closure and strain recovery. In this chapter, we describe the variables which can afflict an inbred mouse’s genetic background (and hence phenotype), options to consider for strain archiving, and describe how to economically store and recover strains by sperm cryopreservation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- IVF:
-
in vitro fertilization
References
Taft, R. A., Davisson, M. and Wiles, M. V. (2006) Know thy mouse. Trends Genet 22, 649–653.
Doetschman, T., Gregg, R. G., Maeda, N., Hooper, M. L., Melton, D. W., Thompson, S., et al. (1987) Targetted correction of a mutant HPRT gene in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature 330, 576–578.
Thomas, K. R., Folger, K. R. and Capecchi, M. R. (1986) High frequency targeting of genes to specific sites in the mammalian genome. Cell 44, 419–428.
Waterston, R., Lindblad-Toh, K., Birney, E., Rogers, J., Abril, J., Agarwal, P., et al. (2002) Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420, 520–562.
Bogue, M. A., Grubb, S. C., Maddatu, T. P. and Bult, C. J. (2007) Mouse phenome database (MPD). Nucl Acids Res 35, D643–D649.
Darwin, C. (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, 1st ed. John Murray, London.
Cook Jr, E. H. and Scherer, S. W. (2008) Copy-number variations associated with neuropsychiatric conditions. Nature 455, 919–923.
Iafrate, A. J., Feuk, L., Rivera, M. N., Listewnik, M. L., Donahoe, P. K., Qi, Y., et al. (2004) Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome. Nat Genet 36, 949–951.
Sincell, M. (2001) Houston flood: research toll is heavy in time and money. Science 293, 589.
Fortier, A. L., Lopes, F. L., DarricarrËre, N., Martel, J. and Trasler, J. M. (2008) Superovulation alters the expression of imprinted genes in the midgestation mouse placenta. Hum Mol Genet 17, 1653–1665.
Wang, Y., Ock, S. A. and Chian, R. C. (2006) Effect of gonadotropin stimulation on mouse oocyte quality and subsequent embryonic development in vitro. Reprod BioMed Online 12, 304–314.
Ostermeier, G. C., Wiles, M. V., Farley, J. S. and Taft, R. A. (2008) Conserving, distributing and managing genetically modified mouse lines by sperm cryopreservation. PLoS ONE 3.
Whittingham, D. G. (1986) Principles of embryo preservation, (Ashwood-Smith, M. J., Farrant, J., eds.). Low Temperature Preservation in Medicine and Biology. Pitman Medical, Tunbridge Wells, pp. 65–83.
Lyon, M. F. (1981) Sensitivity of various germ-cell stages to environmental mutagens. Mutat Res 87, 323–345.
Tomlinson, M. (2008) Risk management in cryopreservation associated with assisted reproduction. Cryo Lett 29, 165–174.
International Society for, B. and Environmental, R. (2008) Best practices for repositories: Collection, storage, distribution and retrieval of biological materials for research. Cell Preserv Technol 6, 3–58.
Byers, S. L., Payson, S. J. and Taft, R. A. (2006) Performance of ten inbred mouse strains following assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). Theriogenology 65, 1716–1726.
Quinn, P., Kerin, J. F. and Warnes, G. M. (1985) Improved pregnancy rate in human in vitro fertilization with the use of a medium based on the composition of human tubal fluid. Fertil Steril 44, 493–498.
Quinn, P. (1995) Enhanced results in mouse and human embryo culture using a modified human tubal fluid medium lacking glucose and phosphate. J Assist Reprod Genet 12, 97–105.
Adam, A. A., Takahashi, Y., Katagiri, S. and Nagano, M. (2004) Effects of oxygen tension in the gas atmosphere during in vitro maturation, in vitro fertilization and in vitro culture on the efficiency of in vitro production of mouse embryos. Jpn J Vet Res 52, 77–84.
Dumoulin, J. C., Vanvuchelen, R. C., Land, J. A., Pieters, M. H., Geraedts, J. P. and Evers, J. L. (1995) Effect of oxygen concentration on in vitro fertilization and embryo culture in the human and the mouse. Fertil Steril 63, 115–119.
Cohen, J., Gilligan, A., Esposito, W., Schimmel, T. and Dale, B. (1997) Ambient air and its potential effects on conception in vitro. Hum Reprod 12, 1742–1749.
Hall, J., Gilligan, A., Schimmel, T., Cecchi, M. and Cohen, J. (1998) The origin, effects and control of air pollution in laboratories used for human embryo culture. Hum Reprod 13 Suppl 4, 146–155.
Stringfellow, D. A. and Seidel, S. M. (eds.) (1998) Manual of the International Embryo Transfer Society: procedural guide and general information for the use of embryo transfer technology, emphasizing sanitary procedures, 3rd ed. International Embryo Transfer Society, Illinois.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Wiles, M.V., Taft, R.A. (2010). The Sophisticated Mouse: Protecting a Precious Reagent. In: Proetzel, G., Wiles, M. (eds) Mouse Models for Drug Discovery. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 602. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-058-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-058-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-60761-057-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-60761-058-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols