Microinjection and Cell Transplantation in Zebrafish Embryos

  • Qiling Xu
  • Derek Stemple
  • Katherine Joubin
Part of the METHODS IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY™ book series (MIMB, volume 461)

1. Introduction

The use of microinjection to study gene function in zebrafish has become widespread. Its applications include ectopic expression of genes by introducing DNA (1) or RNA into embryos and perturbation of gene function by injecting RNA-encoding truncated proteins (2, 3), blocking antibodies (4), or antisense morpholino oligonucleotides (5). The method involves the injection of DNA, RNA, or morpholino into the yolk or cytoplasm of one-cell-stage embryos using a pressure microinjector and micromanipulator as described here.

The ability to transplant cells and tissue allows one to assess the interactions and behaviors of cells and tissues when placed in ectopic locations or different genetic backgrounds. The combination of microinjection with transplantation complements the genetic tools offered by zebrafish, facilitates studies of inductive interactions and cell behaviors, and enables the generation of germ-line chimeras.

2. Materials

The following general equipment is...


Morpholino Oligonucleotide Embryo Medium Antisense Morpholino Oligonucleotide Donor Embryo Injection Chamber 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Reinhard E et al. (1994) Neural selective activation and temporal regulation of a mammalian GAP-43 promoter in zebrafish. Development 120(7)1767–1775.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Durbin L et al. (1998) Eph signaling is required for segmentation and differentiation of the somites. Genes Dev 12(19):3096–3109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xu Q et al. (1995) Expression of truncated Sek-1 receptor tyrosine kinase disrupts the segmental restriction of gene expression in the Xenopus and zebrafish hind-brain. Development 121(12):4005–4016.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Krauss S et al. (1992) Zebrafish pax[b] is involved in the formation of the mid-brain-hindbrain boundary. Nature 360(6399):87–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nasevicius A, Ekker SC (2000) Effective targeted gene “knockdown” in zebrafish. Nat Genet 26(2):216–220.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Westerfield M (1995) The Zebrafish Book (3rd edn). University of Oregon Press, Eugene.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saude L et al. (2000) Axis-inducing activities and cell fates of the zebrafish organizer. Development 127(16):3407–3417.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shih J,, Fraser SE (1996) Characterizing the zebrafish organizer: microsurgical analysis at the early-shield stage. Development 122(4):1313–1322.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thermes V et al. (2002) I-SceI meganuclease mediates highly efficient transgenesis in fish. Mech Dev 118(1–2):91–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Melton DA et al. (1984) Efficient in vitro synthesis of biologically active RNA and RNA hybridization probes from plasmids containing a bacteriophage SP6 promoter. Nucleic Acids Res 12(18):7035–7056.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krieg PA, Melton DA (1984) Functional messenger RNAs are produced by SP6 in vitro transcription of cloned cDNAs. Nucleic Acids Res 12(18):7057–7070.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rupp RA, L. Snider L, Weintraub H (1994) Xenopus embryos regulate the nuclear localization of XMyoD. Genes Dev 8(11):1311–1323.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Turner DL, Weintraub H (1994) Expression of achaete-scute homolog 3 in Xenopus embryos converts ectodermal cells to a neural fate. Genes Dev 8(12):1434–1447.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Halloran MC et al. (2000) Laser-induced gene expression in specific cells of transgenic zebrafish. Development 127(9):1953–1960.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scheer N et al. (2002) A quantitative analysis of the kinetics of Gal4 activator and effector gene expression in the zebrafish. Mech Dev 112(1–2):9–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xiao T et al. (2003) Transmembrane sema4E guides branchiomotor axons to their targets in zebrafish. J Neurosci 23(10):4190–4198.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kawakami K (2005) Transposon tools and methods in zebrafish. Dev Dyn 234(2):244–254.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kawakami K et al. (2004) A transposon-mediated gene trap approach identifies developmentally regulated genes in zebrafish. Dev Cell 7(1):133–144.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Draper BW, P.A. Morcos PA, Kimmel CB (2001) Inhibition of zebrafish fgf8 pre-mRNA splicing with morpholino oligos: a quantifiable method for gene knockdown. Genesis, 30(3):154–156.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reifers F et al. (1998) Fgf8 is mutated in zebrafish acerebellar (ace) mutants and is required for maintenance of midbrain-hindbrain boundary development and somitogenesis. Development 125(13):2381–2395.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qiling Xu
    • 1
  • Derek Stemple
    • 2
  • Katherine Joubin
    • 3
  1. 1.National Institute for Medical ResearchMill HillLondonUK
  2. 2.Wellcome Trust Sanger InstituteWellcome Trust Genome CampusHinxtonUK
  3. 3.National Institute for Medical ResearchMill HillLondonUK

Personalised recommendations