The Avian Embryo

An Overview
  • Ivor Mason
Part of the METHODS IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY™ book series (MIMB, volume 461)

1. Origins of Avian Embryology

The major advantage of the avian embryo for the embryologist is its accessibility for manipulation and observation. Indeed, it is for this reason that, historically, detailed descriptions of normal development were first available for avian embryos, generally chick embryos (1). Artificial incubation and hatching of chicken eggs date to the time of the 18th dynasty in Egypt (ca. 1400 bc) and possibly even earlier in ancient China. The Egyptian practice of egg incubation is well documented in Roman literature, including references by Pliny, Diodorus Siculus, and in the letters of Emperor Hadrian. However, artificial incubation was lost throughout the Middle Ages and revived only during the 18th century. The first recorded observations of avian embryos are included in the works attributed to Hippocrates (ca. 430 bc), although it was Aristotle who provided the first significant observations (Historia Animalium and De Genera-tione Animalium, ca. 350 bc)....


Chick Embryo Germinal Vesicle Neural Plate Primitive Streak Shell Membrane 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Research in the author's laboratory is supported the MRC, BBSRC, and the Wellcome Trust; and he is a research fellow of the Leverhulme Trust.


  1. 1.
    Needham J (1934) A history of embryology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wolpert L (2004) Much more from the chicken's egg than breakfast—a wonderful model system. Mech Dev 121:1015 – 1017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stern CD (2000) Conrad H. Waddington's contributions to avian and mammalian development, 1930 – 1940. Int J Dev Biol 44:15 – 22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hamburger V (1993) The history of the discovery of the nerve growth factor. J Neurobiol 24:893 – 897.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    New DAT (1966) The culture of avian embryos. Logos, London.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chapman SC, Collignon J, Schoenwolf GC, Lumsden A (2001) Improved method for chick whole-embryo culture using a filter paper carrier. Dev Dyn 220:284 – 289.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Borwompinyo S, Brake J, Mozdziak PE, Petitte JN (2005) Culture of chicken embryos in surrogate eggshells. Poult Sci 84:1477 – 1482.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nakamura H, Funahashi J (2001) Introduction of DNA into chick embryos by in ovo electroporation. Methods 24:43 – 48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Katahira T, Nakamura H. (2003) Gene silencing in chick embryos with a vector-based small interfering RNA system. Dev Growth Differ 45:361 – 367.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nakamura H, Katahira T, Sato T, Watanabe Y, Funahashi J (2004) Gain- and loss-of-function in chick embryos by electroporation. Mech Dev 121:1137 – 1143.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Uchikawa M, Takemoto T, Kamachi Y, Kondoh H (2004) Efficient identification of regulatory sequences in the chicken genome by a powerful combination of embryo electroporation and genome comparison. Mech Dev 121:1145 – 1158.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hamburger V, Hamilton H (1951) A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol 88:49 – 92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hamburger V (1992) The stage series of the chick embryo. Dev Dyn 195:273 – 275.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hamburger V, Hamilton HL (1992 (1951)) A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. Dev Dyn 195:231 – 272.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eyal-Giladi H, Kochav S (1975) From cleavage to primitive streak formation; a complementary normal table and a new look at the first stages of development of the chick, I. General morphology. Dev. Biol. 49:321 – 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bellairs, R, Osmons M (2005) The atlas of chick development (2nd edn). Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dupuy V, Nersessian B, Bakst MR (2002) Embryonic development from first cleavage through 72 hours incubation in two strains of pekin duck (Anas platyrhynchos) Poult Sci 81:860 – 868.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Koecke H-U (1958) Normalstadien der Embryonalentwicklung bei der Hausente (Anas Boschas domestica) Embryologia 4:55 – 78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Padgett CS, Ivey WD (1960) The normal development of the Coturntix quail. Anat Rec 137:1 – 11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bakst MR, Gupta SK, Akuffo V (1997) Comparative development of the turkey and chicken embryo from cleavage through hypoblast formation. Poult Sci 76:83 – 90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Phillips RE, Williams CS (1964) External morphology of the turkey during the incubation period. Poult Sci 23:270 – 277.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hillier LW, Miller W, Birney E, Warren W, Hardison RC, Ponting CP, Bork P, Burt DW, Groenen MA, Delany ME, Dodgson JB, Chinwalla AT, Cliften PF, Clifton SW, Delehaunty KD, Fronick C, Fulton RS, Graves TA, Kremitzki C, Layman D, Magrini V, McPherson JD, Miner TL, Minx P, Nash WE, Nhan MN, Nelson JO, Oddy LG, Pohl CS, Randall-Maher J, Smith SM, Wallis JW, Yang SP, Romanov MN, Rondelli CM, Paton B, Smith J, Morrice D, Daniels L, Tempest HG, Robertson L, Masabanda JS, Griffin DK, Vignal A, Fillon V, Jacobbson L, Kerje S, Andersson L, Crooijmans RP, Aerts J, van der Poel JJ, Ellegren H, Caldwell RB, Hubbard SJ, Grafham DV, Kierzek AM, McLaren SR, Overton IM, Arakawa H, Beattie KJ, Bezzubov Y, Boardman PE, Bonfield JK, Croning MD, Davies RM, Francis MD, Humphray SJ, Scott CE, Taylor RG, Tickle C, Brown WR, Rogers J, Buerstedde JM, Wilson SA, Stubbs L, Ovcharenko I, Gordon L, Lucas S, Miller MM, Inoko H, Shiina T, Kaufman J, Salomonsen J, Skjoedt K, Wong GK, Wang J, Liu B, Wang J, Yu J, Yang H, Nefedov M, Koriabine M, Dejong PJ, Goodstadt L, Webber C, Dickens NJ, Letunic I, Suyama M, Torrents D, von Mering C et al. (2004) Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432:695 – 716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Burt DW (2004) The chicken genome and the developmental biologist. Mech Dev 121:1129 – 1135.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Boardman PE, Sanz-Ezquerro J, Overton IM, Burt DW, Bosch E, Fong WT, Tickle C, Brown WR, Wilson SA, Hubbard SJ (2002) A comprehensive collection of chicken cDNAs. Curr Biol 12:1965 – 1969.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Burnside J, Neiman P, Tang J, Basom R, Talbot R, Aronszajn M, Burt D, Delrow J (2005) Development of a cDNA array for chicken gene expression analysis. BMC Genomics 6:13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bell GW, Yatskievych TA, Antin PB (2004) GEISHA, a whole-mount in situ hybridization gene expression screen in chicken embryos. Dev Dyn 229:677 – 87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sang H (2004) Prospects for transgenesis in the chick. Mech Dev 121:1179 – 1186.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Petitte JN, Liu G, Yang Z (2004) Avian pluripotent stem cells. Mech Dev 121:1159 – 1168.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivor Mason
    • 1
  1. 1.MRC Centre for Developmental NeurobiologyKing's College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations