Skip to main content

The Value of the Dental Impaction Pain Model in Drug Development

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Analgesia

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 617))

Abstract

The modern version of the Dental Impaction Pain Model (DIPM) was developed in the mid-1970s. Since that time, several hundred studies have been conducted by numerous investigators. Today it is arguably the most utilized of all the acute pain models. Its popularity is due to the success rate of the studies, fast subject entry, and cost effectiveness. The surgical procedure is extremely standardized, and the surgery requires either minimal or no use of CNS depressant anesthetics. The methodology is similar to that utilized in other acute pain models; however, the DIPM is much more versatile than most other models. The model can be easily adapted to perform multiple-dose studies, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) correlations, preemptive interventions, and sleep-pain studies. A few investigators have even developed microdialysis techniques, wherein they insert probes into extraction sockets to collect exudates for measuring biochemical mediators of pain or drug levels at the site of injury. In many instances, an accomplished site can complete a study of several hundred subjects in approximately 3 months. There are studies in the literature that have incorporated up to six treatment arms in one study and clearly separated the drugs from each other. The exquisite assay sensitivity is due to the homogeneity of the study population, the predictable level and appropriate intensity of the postsurgical pain, and the minimizing of variability by using only one or two study centers. The DIPM has been employed to evaluate NSAIDs (both nonselective and selective Cox inhibitors), opioids and combination analgesics, as well as some investigational drugs with unique mechanisms of action. The model is particularly useful for proof-of-concept studies that require dose-ranging and profiling the time-effect curve for efficacy including onset, peak effect, and duration of analgesic activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cooper SA, Needle SE, Kruger GO (1977) An analgesic relative potency assay comparing aspirin, ibuprofen and placebo. J Oral Surg 35:898–903

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cooper SA, Breen JF, Giuliani RL (1979) Replicate studies comparing the relative efficacies of aspirin and indoprofen in oral surgery outpatients. J Clin Pharmacol 19:151–159

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper SA, Reynolds DC, Kruger GO, Gottlieb S (1980) An analgesic relative potency assay comparing zomepirac sodium and aspirin. J Clin Pharmacol 20:98–106

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper SA, Quinn PD, MacAfee K, Hersh EV, Sullivan D, Lamp C (1993) Ibuprofen controlled release formulation - a clinical trial in dental impaction pain. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path 75:677–683

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Doyle G, Jayawardena S, Ashraf E, Cooper SA (2002) Efficacy and tolerability of nonprescription ibuprofen versus celecoxib for dental pain. J Clin Pharmacol 42:912–919

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper SA, Hersh EV, Betts NJ, Wedell D, Quinn P, Lamp C, Herman D, Reynolds D, Gallegos LT, Reynolds B (1994) Multidose analgesic study of two mefanamic acid formulations in a postsurgical dental pain model. Analgesia 1:65–71

    Google Scholar 

  7. Desjardins PJ, Black P, Papageorge M, Norwood T, Shen DD, Norris L, Ardia A (2002) Ibuprofen arginate provides effective relief from postoperative dental pain with more rapid onset of action than ibuprofen. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 58(6):387–394

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hersh EV, Levin L, Cooper SA, Doyle G, Waksman J, Wedell D, Hong D, Secreto SA (2000) Ibuprofen liquigel for oral surgery pain. Clin Ther 22:1306–1318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper SA et al (1994) Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study of ibuprofen formulations. Clin Pharmacol Ther 55:126

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dionne RA, Cooper SA (1978) Evaluation of preoperative ibuprofen for postoperative pain after removal of third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path 45:851–856

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dionne RA, Campbell RA, Cooper SA, Hall DL, Buckingham B (1983) Suppression of post-operative pain by preoperative administration of ibuprofen in comparison to placebo, acetaminophen, and acetaminophen plus codeine. J Clin Pharmacol 23:37–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Desjardins PJ, Shu VS, Recker DP, Verburg KM, Woolf CJ (2002) A single preoperative oral dose of valdecoxib, a new cyclooxygenase-2 specific inhibitor, relieves post-oral surgery or bunionectomy pain. Anesthesiology 97:565–573

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cooper SA, Engel J, Ladov M, Precheur H, Rosenheck A, Rauch D (1982) Analgesic efficacy of an ibuprofen-codeine combination. Pharmacotherapy 2:162–167

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sunshine A, Roure C, Olson N, Laska EM, Zorrilla C, Rivera J (1987) Analgesic efficacy of two ibuprofen-codeine combinations for the treatment of postepisiotomy and postoperative pain. Clin Pharmacol Ther 42:374–380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cooper SA (1993) Analgesic efficacy of an ibuprofen-oxycodone combination. Clin Phar­macol Ther 53:148

    Google Scholar 

  16. Singla N, Pong A, Newman K, MD-10 Study Group (2005) Combination oxycodone 5 mg/ibuprofen 400 mg for the treatment of pain after abdominal or pelvic surgery in women: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled parallel-group study. Clin Ther 27:45–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Daniels SE, Desjardins PJ, Talwalker S, Recker DP, Verburg KM (2002) The analgesic efficacy of valdecoxib vs. oxycodone/acetaminophen after oral surgery. J Am Dent Assoc 133:611–621

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Desjardins PJ, Norris LH, Cooper SA, Reynolds DC (2000) Analgesic efficacy of intranasal butorphanol (Stadol NS) in the treatment of pain after dental impaction surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58(Suppl. 2):19–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Daniels S, Casson E, Stegmann JU, Oh C, Okamoto A, Rauschkolb C, Upmalis D (2009) A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of the relative efficacy and tolerability of tapentadol IR and oxycodone IR for acute pain. Curr Med Res Opin 25:1555–61

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kleinert R, Lange C, Steup A, Black P, Goldberg J, and Desjardins, P (2008) Single dose analgesic efficacy of tapentadol in postsurgical dental pain: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg 107:2048–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Cooper, S.A., Desjardins, P.J. (2010). The Value of the Dental Impaction Pain Model in Drug Development. In: Szallasi, A. (eds) Analgesia. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 617. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-323-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-323-7_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60327-322-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60327-323-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics