Abstract
The success of Drosophila as a genetic model organism is based on the efficient generation, recovery, and identification of new mutations. Various agents have been used to induce de novo DNA lesions. However, the use of mutagenic alkylating agents, especially ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), has become a standard approach for mutagenesis that has been succesfully used in the classic forward genetic screens that have defined the field of developmental genetics, as well as in many alternative screening schemes that have since been developed. In this chapter, a basic EMS mutagenesis protocol is introduced, and examples for the fly crossing schemes used in several different types of screen are presented. In addition, some new genome sequence-based approaches are discussed that have alleviated the notoriously difficult molecular mapping of EMS induced point mutations. Together these protocols should allow researchers as yet unfamiliar with Drosophila genetics to take advantage of all the benefits of this mutagenesis method, which include its wide and largely unbiased coverage of the genome, the high mutation frequency, and the variety of null, hypomorphic, conditional (e.g., temperature sensitive), or domain specific mutations that can be caused by EMS treatment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Lewis, E. B. and Bacher, F. (1968) Methods of feeding ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS) to Drosophila males. Drosophila Inf. Service 43, 193.
Ashburner, M., Golic, K. G., and Hawley, R. S. (2005) Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, pp. 207–312.
Bentley, A., MacLennan, B., Calvo, J., and Dearolf, C. R. (2000) Targeted recovery of mutations in Drosophila. Genetics 156, 1169–1173.
Pastink, A., Heemskerk, E., Nivard, M. J., van Vliet, C. J., and Vogel, E. W. (1991) Mutational specificity of ethyl methanesulfonate in excision-repairproficient and-deficient strains of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Gen. Genet. 229, 213–218.
Winkler, S., Schwabedissen, A., Backasch, D., et al. (2005) Target-selected mutant screen by TILLING in Drosophila. Genome Res. 15, 718–723.
Vogel, E. and Natarajan, A. T. (1979) The relation between reaction kinetics and mutagenic action of mono-functional alkylating agents in higher eukaryotic systems. I. Recessive lethal mutations and translocations in Drosophila. Mutat. Res. 62, 51–100.
Miklos, G. L. and Rubin, G. M. (1996) The role of the genome project in determining gene function: insights from model organisms. Cell 86, 521–529.
Grigliatti, T. (1998) Mutagenesis, in Drosophila: A practical approach, D. B. Roberts, (ed.). IRL Press, Oxford. pp. 55–83.
Nissani, M. (1977) On the interpretation of mutagenically induced mosaicism in Drosophila. Genetics 86, 779–787.
Lindsley, D. L. and Zimm, G. G. (1992) The genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Academic Press. San Diego.
Till, B., Reynolds, S., Greene, E., et al. (2003) Large-scale discovery of induced point mutations with high-throughput TILLING. Genome Res. 13, 524–530.
Grether, M. E., Abrams, J. M., Agapite, J., White, K., and Steller, H. (1995) The head involution defective gene of Drosophila melanogaster functions in programmed cell death. Genes Dev. 9, 1694–1708.
St Johnston, D. (2002) The art and design of genetic screens: Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 176–188.
Bellen, H. J., Levis, R. W., Liao, G., et al. (2004) The BDGP gene disruption project: single transposon insertions associated with 40% of Drosophila genes. Genetics 167, 761–781.
Rorth, P. (1996) A modular misexpression screen in Drosophila detecting tissuespecific phenotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 12,418–12,422.
Parks, A., Cook, K., Belvin, M., et al. (2004) Systematic generation of highresolution deletion coverage of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Nat. Genet. 36, 288–292.
Ryder, E., Blows, F., Ashburner, M., et al. (2004) The DrosDel collection: a set of P-element insertions for generating custom chromosomal aberrations in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 167, 797–813.
Franc, N. C., Heitzler, P., Ezekowitz, R. A., and White, K. (1999) Requirement for croquemort in phagocytosis of apoptotic cells in Drosophila. Science 284, 1991–1994.
Berger, J., Suzuki, T., Senti, K. A., Stubbs, J., Schaffner, G., and Dickson, B. J. (2001) Genetic mapping with SNP markers in Drosophila. Nat. Genet. 29, 475–481.
Martin, S. G., Dobi, K. C., and St Johnston, D. (2001) A rapid method to map mutations in Drosophila. Genome Biol. 2, RESEARCH0036.1–0036.12.
Zipperlen, P., Nairz, K., Rimann, I., et al. (2005) A universal method for automated gene mapping. Genome Biol. 6, R19.
Stephens, M., Sloan, J. S., Robertson, P. D., Scheet, P., and Nickerson, D. A. (2006) Automating sequence-based detection and genotyping of SNPs from diploid samples. Nat. Genet. 38, 375–381.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Bökel, C. (2008). EMS Screens. In: Dahmann, C. (eds) Drosophila. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 420. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-583-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-583-1_7
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-817-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-583-1
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols