Summary
Is there any reason why we should predict contact maps (CMs)? The question is one of the several ‘NP-hard’ questions that arise when striving for feasible solutions of the protein folding problem. At some point, theoreticians started thinking that a possible alternative to an unsolvable problem was to predict a simplified version of the protein structure: a CM. In this chapter, we will clarify that whenever problems are difficult they remain at least as difficult in the process of finding approximate solutions or heuristic approaches. However, humans rarely give up, as it is stimulating to find solutions in the face of difficulties. CMs of proteins are an interesting and useful representation of protein structures. These two-dimensional representations capture all the important features of a protein fold. We will review the general characteristics of CMs and the methods developed to study and predict them, and we will highlight some new ideas on how to improve CM predictions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Havel, T. F. (1998). Distance geometry: theory, algorithms, and chemical applications. Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Vendruscolo, M. and Domany, E. (1999). Protein folding using contact maps. arXiv cond-mat, 9901215.
Bohr, J., Bohr, H., Brunak, S., Cotterill, R. M., Fredholm, H., Lautrup, B. and Petersen, S. B. (1993). Protein structures from distance inequalities. Journal of Molecular Biology 231, 861–869.
Fariselli, P., Olmea, O., Valencia, A. and Casadio, R. (2001). Progress in predicting inter-residue contacts of proteins with neural networks and correlated mutations. Proteins Suppl 5, 157–162.
Galaktionov, S. G. and Marshall, G. R. (1994). 27th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-27), Maui, Hawaii.
Baldi, P. and Brunak S. (2001). Bioinformatics: The Machine Learning Approach, A Bradford Book, Second edition. MIT Press, Cambridge.
Goldman, D., Istrail, S. and Papadimitriou, C. (1999). Algorithmic aspects of protein structure similarity. Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, New York, (USA), 512–522.
Fariselli, P., Olmea, O., Valencia, A. and Casadio, R. (2001). Prediction of contact maps with neural networks and correlated mutations. Protein Engineering 14, 835–843.
Porto, M., Bastolla, U., Roman, H. E. and Vendruscolo, M. (2004). Reconstruction of protein structures from a vectorial representation. Physical Review Letters 92, 218101.
Pollastri, G., Baldi, P., Fariselli, P. and Casadio, R. (2002). Prediction of coordination number and relative solvent accessibility in proteins. Proteins 47(2), 142–153.
Goebel, U., Sander, C., Schneider, R. and Valencia, A. (1994). Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins 18, 309–317.
Olmea, O. and Valencia, A. (1997). Improving contact predictions by the combination of correlated mutations and other sources of sequence information. Folding & Design 2, S25–S32.
Fariselli, P. and Casadio, R. (1999). A neural network based predictor of residue contacts in proteins. Protein Engineering 12, 15–21.
Punta, M. and Rost, B. (2005). PROFcon: novel prediction of long-range contacts. Bioinformatics 21, 2960–2968.
Bystroff, C. and Shao, Y. (2002). Fully automated ab initio protein structure prediction using I-SITES, HMMSTR and ROSETTA. Bioinformatics 18 Suppl 1, S54–S61.
Zhao, Y. and Karypis, G. (2003). 3rd IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE).
MacCallum, R. M. (2004). Striped sheets and protein contact prediction. Bioinformatics 20 Suppl 1, I224–I231.
Pollastri, G. and Baldi, P. (2002). Prediction of contact maps by GIOHMMs and recurrent neural networks using lateral propagation from all four cardinal corners. Bioinformatics 18 Suppl 1, S62–S70.
Vullo, A., Walsh, I. and Pollastri, G. (2006). A two-stage approach for improved prediction of residue contact maps. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 180.
Eyrich, V. A., Przybylski, D., Koh, I. Y., Grana, O., Pazos, F., Valencia, A. and Rost, B. (2003). CAFASP3 in the spotlight of EVA. Proteins 53 Suppl 6, 548–560.
Grana, O., Baker, D., MacCallum, R. M., Meiler, J., Punta, M., Rost, B., Tress, M. L. and Valencia, A. (2005). CASP6 assessment of contact prediction. Proteins 61 Suppl 7, 214–224.
Barabasi, A. L. (2003). Linked: The New Science of Networks, Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Watts, D. J. and Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ’small-world’ networks. Nature 393, 440–442.
Vendruscolo, M., Dokholyan, N. V., Paci, E. and Karplus, M. (2002). Small-world view of the amino acids that play a key role in protein folding. Physical Review. E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 65, 061910.
Watts, D. J. (1999). Small Worlds. The Dynamics of Networks Between Order and Randomness, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Vendruscolo, M. and Domany, E. (1998). Efficient dynamics in the space of contact maps. Folding & Design 3, 329–336.
Andricioaei, I., Voter, A. F. and Straub, J. E. (2001). Smart Darting Monte Carlo. The Journal of Chemical Physics 114, 6994–7000.
Atilgan, A. R., Akan, P. and Baysal, C. (2004). Small-world communication of residues and significance for protein dynamics. Biophysical Journal 86, 85–91.
Bagler, G. and Sinha, S. (2005). Network properties of protein structures. Physica A 346, 27–33.
Greene, L. H. and Higman, V. A. (2003). Uncovering network systems within protein structures. Journal of Molecular Biology 334, 781–791.
Barabasi, A. L. and Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286, 509–512.
Acknowledgments
We thank MIUR for the following grants: PNR-2003 grant delivered to PF, a PNR 2001–2003 (FIRB art.8) and PNR 2003 projects (FIRB art.8) on Bioinformatics for Genomics and Proteomics and LIBI-Laboratorio Internazionale di BioInformatica, both delivered to RC. This work was also supported by the Biosapiens Network of Excellence project (a grant of the European Unions VI Framework Programme).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Humana Press Inc
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Bartoli, L., Capriotti, E., Fariselli, P., Martelli, P.L., Casadio, R. (2008). The Pros and Cons of Predicting Protein Contact Maps. In: Zaki, M.J., Bystroff, C. (eds) Protein Structure Prediction. Methods in Molecular Biology™, vol 413. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-574-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-574-9_8
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-752-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-574-9
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols