Cell Surface Marker and Cell Cycle Analysis, Hedgehog Signaling, and Flow Cytometry

  • Kristina Detmer
  • Ronald E. Garner
Part of the Methods Inmolecular Biology™ book series (MIMB, volume 397)


Detailed cytological analysis of cells undergoing differentiation often reveals clues to the regulation of multiple cell features. The Hedgehog (Hh) signaling cascade is a master regulator of cell fate during differentiation and is implicated in the development of some neoplasias. Hh signaling affects the expression of cell surface markers of differentiation.We have used the flow cytometer to evaluate the effect of blockage of the Hh signal on the expression of cell surface markers of erythroid differentiation in an in vitro system. In addition, the effect of Hh signaling on the distribution of cells in the phases of the cell cycle over the course of erythroid differentiation was assessed. Inhibition of the Hh signal retards progression of the erythroid developmental program. Included is a discussion of some of the basic parameters, limitations, and interpretations of flow cytometric analysis used for CD marker expression and cell cycle studies.

Key Words

Flow cytometry Hedgehog cyclopamine cell cycle fluorescent antibodies CD marker propidium iodide differentiation 


  1. 1.
    McMahon, A. P., Ingham, P. W., and Tabin, C. J. (2003) Developmental roles and clinical significance of Hedgehog signaling. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 53, 1–114.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Teh, M. T., Wong, S. T., Neill, G. W., Ghali, L. R., Philpott, M. P., and Quinn, A. G. (2002) FOXM1 is a downstream target of Gli1 in basal cell carcinomas. Cancer Res. 62, 4773–4780.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shapiro, H. M. (2003) Practical Flow Cytometry, 4th Ed., Wiley-Liss, Hoboken, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Caldwell, C. W. (2001) Quality control and quality assurance in Immunophenotyping. In Flow Cytometry in Clinical Diagnosis (Keren, D. F., McCoy, J. P. J., and Carey, J. L. eds), American Society of Clinical pathologists Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 117–156.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roy, S. and Ingham, P. W. (2002) Hedgehogs tryst with the cell cycle. J. Cell Sci. 115, 4393–4397.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neumann, C. J. (2005) Hedgehogs as negative regulators of the cell cycle. Cell Cycle 4, 1139–1140.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schmid, I., Cole, S. W., Zack, J. A., and Giorgi, J. V. (2000) Measurement of lymphocyte subset proliferation by three-color immunofluorescence and DNA flow cytometry. J. Immunol. Methods 235, 121–131.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Begg, A. C., McNally, N. J., Shrieve, D. C., and Karcher, H. (1985) A method to measure the duration of DNA synthesis and the potential doubling time from a single sample. Cytometry 6, 620–626.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristina Detmer
    • 1
  • Ronald E. Garner
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Basic Medical SciencesMercer University School of MedicineSt., MaconUSA

Personalised recommendations