Abstract
Kinetochores are essential for the proper positioning, movement and segregation of chromosomes on spindle microtubules. Live cell analyses of kinetochore movements on the spindle provide an important tool for dissecting the molecular machinery underlying kinetochore-based chromosome motility. Here, we describe contemporary techniques for studying and manipulating kinetochore function in live Drosophila syncytial blastoderm-stage embryos and S2 cells.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Grieder, N. C., de Cuevas, M., and Spradling, A. C. (2000) The fusome organizes the microtubule network during oocyte differentiation in Drosophila. Development 127, 4253–4264.
Trieselmann, N. and Wilde, A. (2002) Ran localizes around the microtubule spindle in vivo during mitosis in Drosophila embryos. Curr. Biol. 12, 1124–1129.
Gergely, F., Kidd, D., Jeffers, K., Wakefield, J. G., and Raff, J. W. (2000) DTACC: a novel centrosomal protein required for normal spindle function in the early Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 19, 241–252.
Clarkson, M. and Saint, R. (1999) A His2AvDGFP fusion gene complements a lethal His2AvD mutant allele and provides an in vivo marker for Drosophila chromosome behavior. DNA Cell Biol. 18, 457–462.
Sharp, D. J., Rogers, G. C., and Scholey, J. M. (2000) Cytoplasmic dynein is required for poleward chromosome movement during mitosis in Drosophila embryos. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 922–930.
Henikoff, S., Ahmad, K., Platero, J. S., and van Steensel, B. (2000) Heterochromatic deposition of centromeric histone H3-like proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 716–721.
Brust-Mascher, I. and Scholey, J. M. (2002) Microtubule flux and sliding in mitotic spindles of Drosophila embryos. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 3967–3975.
Basto, R., Scaerou, F., Mische, S., et al. (2004) In vivo dynamics of the rough deal checkpoint protein during Drosophila mitosis. Curr. Biol. 14, 56–61.
Valdes-Perez, R. E. and Minden, J. S. (1995) Drosophila melanogaster syncytial nuclear divisions are patterned: time-lapse images, hypothesis and computational evidence. J. Theor. Biol. 175, 525–532.
Sharp, D. J., Brown, H. M., Kwon, M., Rogers, G. C., Holland, G., and Scholey, J. M. (2000) Functional coordination of three mitotic motors in Drosophila embryos. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 241–253.
Sharp, D. J., Yu, K. R., Sisson, J. C., Sullivan, W., and Scholey, J. M. (1999) Antagonistic microtubule-sliding motors position mitotic centrosomes in Drosophila early embryos. Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 51–54.
Kwon, M., Morales-Mulia, S., Brust-Mascher, I., Rogers, G. C., Sharp, D. J., and Scholey, J. M. (2004) The chromokinesin, KLP3A, dives mitotic spindle pole separation during prometaphase and anaphase and facilitates chromatid motility. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 219–233.
Rogers, G. C., Rogers, S. L., Schwimmer, T. A., et al. (2004) Two mitotic kinesins cooperate to drive sister chromatid separation during anaphase. Nature 427, 364–370.
Rogers, S. L., Rogers, G. C., Sharp, D. J., and Vale, R. D. (2002) Drosophila EB1 is important for proper assembly, dynamics, and positioning of the mitotic spindle. J. Cell Biol. 158, 873–884.
Ruden, D. M., Cui, W., Sollars, V., and Alterman, M. (1997) A Drosophila kinesin-like protein, Klp38B, functions during meiosis, mitosis, and segmentation. Dev. Biol. 191, 284–296.
Mermall, V. and Miller, K. G. (1995) The 95F unconventional myosin is required for proper organization of the Drosophila syncytial blastoderm. J. Cell Biol. 129, 1575–1588.
Savoian, M. S., Goldberg, M. L., and Rieder, C. L. (2000) The rate of poleward chromosome motion is attenuated in Drosophila zw10 and rod mutants. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 948–952.
Maddox, P. S., Moree, B., Canman, J. C., and Salmon, E. D. (2003) Spinning disk confocal microscope system for rapid high-resolution, multimode, fluorescence speckle microscopy and green fluorescent protein imaging in living cells. Methods Enzymol. 360, 597–617.
Rogers, G. C., Rogers, S. L., and Sharp, D. J. (2005) Spindle microtubules in flux. J. Cell. Sci. 118, 1105–1116.
Clemens, J. C., Worby, C. A., Simonson-Leff, N., et al. (2000) Use of double-stranded RNA interference in Drosophila cell lines to dissect signal transduction pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 6499–6503.
Elbashir, S. M., Lendeckel, W., and Tuschl, T. (2001) RNA interference is mediated by 21-and 22-nucleotide RNAs. Genes Dev. 15, 188–200.
Caplen, N. J., Fleenor, J., Fire, A., and Morgan, R. A. (2000) dsRNA-mediated gene silencing in cultured Drosophila cells: a tissue culture model for the analysis of RNA interference. Gene 252, 95–105.
Worby, C. A., Simonson-Leff, N., and Dixon, J. E. (2001) RNA interference of gene expression (RNAi) in cultured Drosophila cells. Sci. STKE 2001, PL1.
March, J. C. and Bentley, W. E. (2004) Insulin stimulates double-stranded RNA uptake in Drosophila S2 cells. Biotechniques 37, 898–900.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Humana Press Inc.
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Buster, D.W., Sharp, D.J. (2007). Live Cell Approaches for Studying Kinetochore-Microtubule Interactions in Drosophila. In: Zhou, J. (eds) Microtubule Protocols. Methods in Molecular Medicine™, vol 137. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-442-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-442-1_10
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-642-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-442-1
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols