Skip to main content

Measuring Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations in Mycobacteria

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Mycobacteria Protocols

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 465))

Abstract

An agar dilution method for measuring minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, based on the method of proportion, is described. Mycobacterium strains are grown on Middlebrook 7H10 (or 7H11) agar medium with twofold serially diluted drug concentrations in order to determine specific inhibitory values. The proportion of bacilli resistant to a given drug is determined by comparing the number of colony-forming units (CFU) on a drug-free control with those growing in the presence of drug within a specific concentration range. The MIC is defined as the lowest drug concentration that inhibits growth of more than 99% of a bacterial population of M. tuberculosis on solid Middlebrook medium within 21 days of incubation at 37°C. The proportion method, the absolute concentration method, and the resistant ratio method have traditionally been used as standard procedures for antimycobacterial drug-susceptibility testing (DST), and reference data are mainly based on these methods. DST concepts and alternative procedures that have been adopted for DST are also briefly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hawkins JE. Drug susceptibility testing. In Kubica GP, Wayne LG, eds. The Mycobacteria. A Sourcebook. Part A. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York and Basel, 1984:177–193.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Heifets LB. Introduction: Drug susceptibility tests and the clinical outcome of chemotherapy. In: Heifets LB, ed. Drug Susceptibility in the Chemotherapy of Mycobacterial Infections. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, 1991:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  3. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Susceptibility testing of Mycobacteria, Norcardiae, and Other Aerobic Actinomycetes; Approved Standard. NCCLS Document M24-A. NCCLS, Wayne, PA, 2003;23(18):1–71.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chan ED, Iseman MD. Current medical treatment for tuberculosis. BMJ 2002;325:1282–1286.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heginbothom ML. The relationship between the in vitro drug susceptibility of opportunist mycobacteria and their in vivo response to treatment. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2001;5(6):538–545.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heifets L, Desmond E. Clinical mycobacteriology (tuberculosis) laboratory: services and methods in tuberculosis and the tubercle bacillus. In: Cole ST, Eisenach KD, McMurray DN, Jacobs (Jr) eds. Tuberculosis and the Tubercle Bacillus. ASM Press, Washington, DC, 2005:49–69.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mitchison DA. Drug resistance in tuberculosis. Eur Respir J 2005;25:376–379.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dickinson JM, Mitchison DA. In vitro activity of new rifamycins against rifampin-resistant M. tuberculosis and MAIS-complex mycobacteria. Tubercle 1987;68: 177–182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. MacGowan AP, Wise R. Establishing MIC breakpoints and the interpretation of in vitro susceptibility tests. J Antimicrob Chemother 2001;48(Suppl S1):17–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mueller M, de la Pena A, Derendorf H. Issues in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anti-infective agents: Kill curves versus MIC. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004;48(2):369–377.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Siddiqi SH. BACTEC 460 TB system. Product and procedure manual, revision D. Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Sparks, MD, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Heifets LB. Drug susceptibility tests in the management of chemotherapy of tuberculosis. In: Heifets LB, ed. Drug Susceptibility in the Chemotherapy of Mycobacterial Infections. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, 1991:89–121.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bemer P, Bodmer T, Munzinger J, Perrin M, Vincent V, Drugeon H. Multicenter evaluation of the MB/BACT System for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42(3):1030–1034.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chew WK, Lasaitis RM, Schio FA, Gilbert GL. Clinical evaluation of the Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) compared with radiometric (Bactec) and solid media for isolation of Mycobacterium species. J Med Microbiol 1998;47:821–827.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bergmann JS, Woods GL. Evaluation of the ESP Culture System II for testing susceptibilities of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates to four primary antituberculous drugs. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36(10):2940–2943.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Woods GL, Fish G, Plaunt M, Murphy T. Clinical evaluation of Difco ESP culture system II for growth and detection of mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35(1):121–124.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Somoskövi A, Magyar P. Comparison of the Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube with MB Redox, Löwenstein-Jensen, and Middlebrook 7H11 media for recovery of mycobacteria in clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37(5):1366–1369.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brunello F, Fontana R. Reliability of the MB/BACT system for testing susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains to anti-tuberculosis drugs. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:872–873.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Heifets, LB. Drug susceptibility testing. In: Heifets LB (guest ed.), Clauser G ed. Clinics in Laboratory Medicine, vol 16 (3). W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1996:641–656.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dickinson JM, Allen BW, Mitchison DA. Slide culture sensitivity tests. Tubercle 1989;70:115–121.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Welch DF, Guruswamy AP, Sides SJ, Shaw CH, Gilchrist MJ. Timely culture for mycobacteria which utilizes a microcolony method. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31(8):2178–2184.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mejia GI, Castrillon L, Trujillo H, Robledo JA. Microcolony detection in 7H11 thin layer culture is an alternative for rapid diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1999;3(2):138–142.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Park WG, Bishai R, Chaisson E, Dorman SE. Performance of the microscopic observation drug susceptibility assay in drug susceptibility testing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40(12):4750–4752.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wanger A, Mills K. Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis susceptibility to ethambutol, isoniazid, rifampicin, and streptomycin by using Etest. J Clin Microbiol 1996;34(7):1672–1676.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nilsson LE, Hoffner SE, Ansehehn S. Rapid susceptibility testing of M. tuberculosis by bioluminescence assay of mycobacterial ATP. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1988;32:1208–1212.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jacobs WR Jr, Barletta RG, Udani R, Chan J, Kalkut G, Sosne G, Kieser T, Sarkis GJ, Hatfull GF, Bloom BR. Rapid assessment of drug susceptibilities of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by means of luciferase reporter phages. Science 1993;260:819–822.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Albert H, Trollip A, Seaman T, Mole RJ. Simple, phage based (FastPlaque) technology to determine rifampicin resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from sputum. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2004;8(9):1114–1119.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Franzblau SG, Witzig RS, McLaughlin JC, Torres P, Madico G, Hernandez A, Degnan MT, Cook MB, Quenzer VK, Ferguson RM, Gilman RH. Rapid, low-technology MIC determination with clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates by using the microplate alamar blue assay. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36(2):362–366.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Leite CQF, Beretta ALRZ, Anno IS, Telles MAS. Development of a microdilution method to evaluate Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug susceptibility. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003;52:796–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul D. van Helden PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Sirgel, F.A., Wiid, I.J., van Helden, P.D. (2009). Measuring Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations in Mycobacteria. In: Parish, T., Brown, A. (eds) Mycobacteria Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 465. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-207-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-207-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-889-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-207-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics