Abstract
Regulation by ubiquitin (Ub) and ubiquitin-like (UbL) modifiers can confer their substrate proteins a myriad of assignments, such as inducing protein–protein interactions, the internalization of membrane proteins, or their degradation via the proteasome. The underlying code regulating those diverse endpoints appears to be based on the topology of the ubiquitin chains formed.
Experimental characterization of the specific regulation mediated by Ub and UbLs is not trivial. The substoichiometric levels of Ub- and UbL-modified proteins greatly limit their analytical detection in a background of more abundant proteins. Therefore, modified proteins or peptides must be enriched prior to any downstream detection analysis. For that purpose, we recently developed a GFP-tag based isolation strategy. Here we illustrate the usefulness of combining GFP-tag isolation strategy with mass spectrometry (MS) to identify Ub- and UbL-modified residues within the GFP-tagged protein, as well as to uncover the types of Ub and UbL chains formed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Komander D, Rape M (2012) The ubiquitin code. Annu Rev Biochem 81:203–229. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-060310-170328
Swatek KN, Komander D (2016) Ubiquitin modifications. Cell Res 26(4):399–422. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2016.39
Terrell J, Shih S, Dunn R, Hicke L (1998) A function for monoubiquitination in the internalization of a G protein-coupled receptor. Mol Cell 1(2):193–202
Pham AD, Sauer F (2000) Ubiquitin-activating/conjugating activity of TAFII250, a mediator of activation of gene expression in Drosophila. Science 289(5488):2357–2360
Glickman MH, Ciechanover A (2002) The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction. Physiol Rev 82(2):373–428. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00027.2001
Ciechanover A (2013) Intracellular protein degradation: from a vague idea through the lysosome and the ubiquitin-proteasome system and onto human diseases and drug targeting. Bioorg Med Chem 21(12):3400–3410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2013.01.056
Hicke L (2001) Protein regulation by monoubiquitin. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2(3):195–201. https://doi.org/10.1038/35056583
Haglund K, Sigismund S, Polo S, Szymkiewicz I, Di Fiore PP, Dikic I (2003) Multiple monoubiquitination of RTKs is sufficient for their endocytosis and degradation. Nat Cell Biol 5(5):461–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb983
Thrower JS, Hoffman L, Rechsteiner M, Pickart CM (2000) Recognition of the polyubiquitin proteolytic signal. EMBO J 19(1):94–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/19.1.94
Wickliffe KE, Williamson A, Meyer HJ, Kelly A, Rape M (2011) K11-linked ubiquitin chains as novel regulators of cell division. Trends Cell Biol 21(11):656–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2011.08.008
Chen ZJ, Sun LJ (2009) Nonproteolytic functions of ubiquitin in cell signaling. Mol Cell 33(3):275–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.01.014
Ramirez J, Lectez B, Osinalde N, Siva M, Elu N, Aloria K, Prochazkova M, Perez C, Martinez-Hernandez J, Barrio R, Saskova KG, Arizmendi JM, Mayor U (2018) Quantitative proteomics reveals neuronal ubiquitination of Rngo/Ddi1 and several proteasomal subunits by Ube3a, accounting for the complexity of Angelman syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 27(11):1955–1971. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddy103
Lee SY, Ramirez J, Franco M, Lectez B, Gonzalez M, Barrio R, Mayor U (2014) Ube3a, the E3 ubiquitin ligase causing Angelman syndrome and linked to autism, regulates protein homeostasis through the proteasomal shuttle Rpn10. Cell Mol Life Sci 71(14):2747–2758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-013-1526-7
Ramirez J, Martinez A, Lectez B, Lee SY, Franco M, Barrio R, Dittmar G, Mayor U (2015) Proteomic analysis of the ubiquitin landscape in the drosophila embryonic nervous system and the adult photoreceptor cells. PLoS One 10(10):e0139083. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139083
Min M, Mevissen TE, De Luca M, Komander D, Lindon C (2015) Efficient APC/C substrate degradation in cells undergoing mitotic exit depends on K11 ubiquitin linkages. Mol Biol Cell 26(24):4325–4332. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E15-02-0102
Beer LA, Liu P, Ky B, Barnhart KT, Speicher DW (2017) Efficient quantitative comparisons of plasma proteomes using label-free analysis with MaxQuant. Methods Mol Biol 1619:339–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7057-5_23
Nielsen ML, Vermeulen M, Bonaldi T, Cox J, Moroder L, Mann M (2008) Iodoacetamide-induced artifact mimics ubiquitination in mass spectrometry. Nat Methods 5(6):459–460. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth0608-459
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge Jabi Beaskoetxea, Kerman Aloria, and Jesus Mari Arizmendi for all their advice and support. The authors are grateful of the technical support provided by UPV/EHU SGIker (ERDF and ESF). This work was supported by Spanish MINECO [grant SAF2016-76898-P].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Elu, N., Lectez, B., Ramirez, J., Osinalde, N., Mayor, U. (2020). Mass Spectrometry-Based Characterization of Ub- and UbL-Modified Proteins. In: Matthiesen, R. (eds) Mass Spectrometry Data Analysis in Proteomics. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2051. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9744-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9744-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-9743-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-9744-2
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols