Abstract
The opportunistic pathogen Proteus mirabilis engages in visually dramatic and dynamic social behaviors. Populations of P. mirabilis can rapidly occupy surfaces, such as high-percentage agar and latex, through a collective surface-based motility termed swarming. When in these surface-occupying swarm colonies, P. mirabilis can distinguish between clonal siblings (self) and foreign P. mirabilis strains (nonself). This ability can be assessed by at least two standard methods: boundary formation, aka a Dienes line, and territorial exclusion. Here we describe methods for quantitative analysis of swarm colony expansion, of boundary formation, and of territorial exclusion. These assays can be employed to assess several aspects of P. mirabilis sociality including collective swarm motility, competition, and self versus nonself recognition.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Drzewiecka D (2016) Significance and roles of Proteus spp. bacteria in natural environments. Microb Ecol 72(4):741–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-015-0720-6
Schaffer JN, Pearson MM (2015) Proteus mirabilis and urinary tract infections. Microbiol Spectr 3(5):1–39. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.UTI-0017-2013
Allison C, Emody L, Coleman N, Hughes C (1994) The role of swarm cell differentiation and multicellular migration in the uropathogenicity of Proteus mirabilis. J Infect Dis 169(5):1155–1158. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/169.5.1155
Armbruster CE, Forsyth-DeOrnellas V, Johnson AO, Smith SN, Zhao L, Wu W, Mobley HLT (2017) Genome-wide transposon mutagenesis of Proteus mirabilis: essential genes, fitness factors for catheter-associated urinary tract infection, and the impact of polymicrobial infection on fitness requirements. PLoS Pathog 13(6):e1006434. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006434
Burall LS, Harro JM, Li X, Lockatell CV, Himpsl SD, Hebel JR, Johnson DE, Mobley HLT (2004) Proteus mirabilis genes that contribute to pathogenesis of urinary tract infection: identification of 25 signature-tagged mutants attenuated at least 100-fold. Infect Immun 72(5):2922–2938. https://doi.org/10.1128/Iai.72.5.2922-2938.2004
Pearson MM, Yep A, Smith SN, Mobley HLT (2011) Transcriptome of Proteus mirabilis in the murine urinary tract: virulence and nitrogen assimilation gene expression. Infect Immun 79(7):2619–2631. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.05152-11
Stickler D, Hughes G (1999) Ability of Proteus mirabilis to swarm over urethral catheters. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 18(3):206–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100960050260
Rauprich O, Matsushita M, Weijer CJ, Siegert F, Esipov SE, Shapiro JA (1996) Periodic phenomena in Proteus mirabilis swarm colony development. J Bacteriol 178(22):6525–6538. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.178.22.6525-6538.1996
Hoeniger JF (1966) Cellular changes accompanying the swarming of Proteus mirabilis. II. Observations of stained organisms. Can J Microbiol 12(1):113–123. https://doi.org/10.1139/m66-017
Hoeniger JF (1965) Development of flagella by Proteus mirabilis. J Gen Microbiol 40(1):29. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-40-1-29
Pearson MM, Rasko DA, Smith SN, Mobley HLT (2010) Transcriptome of swarming Proteus mirabilis. Infect Immun 78(6):2834–2845. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01222-09
Jones BV, Young R, Mahenthiralingam E, Stickler DJ (2004) Ultrastructure of Proteus mirabilis swarmer cell rafts and role of swarming in catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Infect Immun 72(7):3941–3950. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.72.7.3941-3950.2004
Dienes L (1946) Reproductive processes in Proteus cultures. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 63(2):265–270. https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-63-15570
Senior BW (1977) The Dienes phenomenon: identification of the determinants of compatibility. J Gen Microbiol 102(2):235–244. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-102-2-235
Gibbs KA, Urbanowski ML, Greenberg EP (2008) Genetic determinants of self identity and social recognition in bacteria. Science 321(5886):256–259. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160033
Saak CC, Gibbs KA (2016) The self-identity protein IdsD is communicated between cells in swarming Proteus mirabilis colonies. J Bacteriol 198(24):3278–3286. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00402-16
De Louvois J (1969) Serotyping and the Dienes reaction on Proteus mirabilis from hospital infections. J Clin Pathol 22(3):263–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jcp.22.3.263
Skirrow MB (1969) The dienes (mutual inhibition) test in the investigation of Proteus infections. J Med Microbiol 2(4):471–477. https://doi.org/10.1099/00222615-2-4-471
Alteri CJ, Himpsl SD, Pickens SR, Lindner JR, Zora JS, Miller JE, Arno PD, Straight SW, Mobley HLT (2013) Multicellular bacteria deploy the type VI secretion system to preemptively strike neighboring cells. PLoS Pathog 9(9):e1003608. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003608
Wenren LM, Sullivan NL, Cardarelli L, Septer AN, Gibbs KA (2013) Two independent pathways for self-recognition in Proteus mirabilis are linked by type VI-dependent export. mBio 4(4). https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00374-13
Belas R, Erskine D, Flaherty D (1991) Transposon mutagenesis in Proteus mirabilis. J Bacteriol 173(19):6289–6293. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.173.19.6289-6293.1991
Dietrich LE, Teal TK, Price-Whelan A, Newman DK (2008) Redox-active antibiotics control gene expression and community behavior in divergent bacteria. Science 321(5893):1203–1206. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160619
Morales-Soto N, Anyan ME, Mattingly AE, Madukoma CS, Harvey CW, Alber M, Deziel E, Kearns DB, Shrout JD (2015) Preparation, imaging, and quantification of bacterial surface motility assays. J Vis Exp (98). https://doi.org/10.3791/52338
Zepeda-Rivera MA, Saak CC, Gibbs KA (2018) A proposed chaperone of the bacterial type VI secretion system functions to constrain a self-identity protein. J Bacteriol 200(14). https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00688-17
Little K, Tipping MJ, Gibbs KA (2018) Swarmer cell development of the bacterium Proteus mirabilis requires the conserved ECA biosynthesis gene, rffG. J Bacteriol 200(18). https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00230-18
Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez JY, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9(7):676–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019
Morris JD, Hewitt JL, Wolfe LG, Kamatkar NG, Chapman SM, Diener JM, Courtney AJ, Leevy WM, Shrout JD (2011) Imaging and analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa swarming and rhamnolipid production. Appl Environ Microbiol 77(23):8310–8317. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.06644-11
Alavi M, Belas R (2001) Surface sensing, swarmer cell differentiation, and biofilm development. Methods Enzymol 336:29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(01)36575-8
Armbruster CE, Mobley HLT (2012) Merging mythology and morphology: the multifaceted lifestyle of Proteus mirabilis. Nat Rev Microbiol 10(11):743–754. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2890
Belas R (2014) Biofilms, flagella, and mechanosensing of surfaces by bacteria. Trends Microbiol 22(9):517–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2014.05.002
Morgenstein RM, Szostek B, Rather PN (2010) Regulation of gene expression during swarmer cell differentiation in Proteus mirabilis. FEMS Microbiol Rev 34(5):753–763. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00229.x
Rather PN (2005) Swarmer cell differentiation in Proteus mirabilis. Environ Microbiol 7(8):1065–1073. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00806.x
Clemmer KM, Rather PN (2007) Regulation of flhDC expression in Proteus mirabilis. Res Microbiol 158(3):295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2006.11.010
Morgenstein RM, Rather PN (2012) Role of the Umo proteins and the Rcs phosphorelay in the swarming motility of the wild type and an O-antigen (waaL) mutant of Proteus mirabilis. J Bacteriol 194(3):669–676. https://doi.org/10.1128/Jb.06047-11
Pearson MM, Mobley HLT (2008) Repression of motility during fimbrial expression: identification of 14 mrpJ gene paralogues in Proteus mirabilis. Mol Microbiol 69(2):548–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06307.x
Adzitey F, Huda N, Ali GR (2013) Molecular techniques for detecting and typing of bacteria, advantages and application to foodborne pathogens isolated from ducks. 3 Biotech 3(2):97–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-012-0074-4
Saak CC, Zepeda-Rivera MA, Gibbs KA (2017) A single point mutation in a TssB/VipA homolog disrupts sheath formation in the type VI secretion system of Proteus mirabilis. PLoS One 12(9):e0184797. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184797
Adamus-Bialek W, Zajac E, Parniewski P, Kaca W (2013) Comparison of antibiotic resistance patterns in collections of Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis uropathogenic strains. Mol Biol Rep 40(4):3429–3435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-012-2420-3
Eisenberg GM, Weiss W, Flippin HF (1958) In vitro susceptibility of Proteus species to streptomycin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and novobiocin. Am J Clin Pathol 30(1):20–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/20.4.325
McCoy AJ, Liu H, Falla TJ, Gunn JS (2001) Identification of Proteus mirabilis mutants with increased sensitivity to antimicrobial peptides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45(7):2030–2037. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.45.7.2030-2037.2001
Sud IJ, Feingold DS (1970) Mechanism of polymyxin B resistance in Proteus mirabilis. J Bacteriol 104(1):289–294.Â
Acknowledgments
We thank members of the Gibbs lab for thoughtful discussions and development of the protocols. The writing of this review was funded by a Smith Family Graduate Fellowship in Science and Engineering (to K.L.), the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, the George W. Merck Fund, and Harvard University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Little, K., Gibbs, K.A. (2019). Analysis of Proteus mirabilis Social Behaviors on Surfaces. In: Pearson, M. (eds) Proteus mirabilis. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2021. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9601-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9601-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-9600-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-9601-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols