Skip to main content

Choosing the Best Gene Predictions with GeneValidator

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
  • 2981 Accesses

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1962))

Abstract

GeneValidator is a tool for determining whether the characteristics of newly predicted protein-coding genes are consistent with those of similar sequences in public databases. For this, it runs up to seven comparisons per gene. Results are shown in an HTML report containing summary statistics and graphical visualizations that aim to be useful for curators. Results are also presented in CSV and JSON formats for automated follow-up analysis.

Here, we describe common usage scenarios of GeneValidator that use the JSON output results together with standard UNIX tools. We demonstrate how GeneValidator’s textual output can be used to filter and subset large gene sets effectively. First, we explain how low-scoring gene models can be identified and extracted for manual curation—for example, as input for genome browsers or gene annotation tools. Second, we show how GeneValidator’s HTML report can be regenerated from a filtered subset of GeneValidator’s JSON output. Subsequently, we demonstrate how GeneValidator’s GUI can be used to complement manual curation efforts. Additionally, we explain how GeneValidator can be used to merge information from multiple annotations by automatically selecting the higher-scoring gene model at each common gene locus. Finally, we show how GeneValidator analyses can be optimized when using large BLAST databases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Protocol
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

Change history

  • 31 October 2019

    This book was published with References 17 and 18 in the incorrect order.

References

  1. Yandell M, Ence D (2012) A beginner’s guide to eukaryotic genome annotation. Nat Rev Genet 13:329–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Benson DA, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Ostell J, Pruitt KD et al (2018) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D41–D47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Holt C, Yandell M (2011) MAKER2: an annotation pipeline and genome-database management tool for second-generation genome projects. BMC Bioinformatics 12:491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoff KJ, Lange S, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M, Stanke M (2016) BRAKER1: unsupervised RNA-Seq-based genome annotation with GeneMark-ET and AUGUSTUS. Bioinformatics 32:767–769

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Keilwagen J, Hartung F, Paulini M, Twardziok SO, Grau J (2018) Combining RNA-seq data and homology-based gene prediction for plants, animals and fungi. BMC Bioinformatics 19:189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schnoes AM, Brown SD, Dodevski I, Babbitt PC (2009) Annotation error in public databases: misannotation of molecular function in enzyme superfamilies. PLoS Comput Biol 5:e1000605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Steijger T, Abril JF, Engström PG, Kokocinski F, RGASP Consortium, Hubbard TJ et al (2013) Assessment of transcript reconstruction methods for RNA-seq. Nat Methods 10:1177–1184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Drăgan M-A, Moghul I, Priyam A, Bustos C, Wurm Y (2016) GeneValidator: identify problems with protein-coding gene predictions. Bioinformatics 32(10):1559–1561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. The UniProt Consortium (2017) UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D158–D169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Suzek BE, Wang Y, Huang H, McGarvey PB, Wu CH, The UniProt Consortium (2015) UniRef clusters: a comprehensive and scalable alternative for improving sequence similarity searches. Bioinformatics 31:926–932

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Buels R, Yao E, Diesh CM, Hayes RD, Munoz-Torres M, Helt G et al (2016) JBrowse: a dynamic web platform for genome visualization and analysis. Genome Biol 17:66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee E, Helt GA, Reese JT, Munoz-Torres MC, Childers CP, Buels RM et al (2013) Web Apollo: a web-based genomic annotation editing platform. Genome Biol 14:R93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Priyam A, Woodcroft BJ, Rai V, Munagala A, Moghul I, Ter F et al (2015) Sequenceserver: a modern graphical user interface for custom BLAST databases. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/033142

  14. Minoche AE, Dohm JC, Schneider J, Holtgräwe D, Viehöver P, Montfort M et al (2015) Exploiting single-molecule transcript sequencing for eukaryotic gene prediction. Genome Biol 16:549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bethesda (MD): National Center for Biotechnology Information (2008) BLAST® Command Line Applications User Manual [Internet] - Limiting a Search with a List of Identifiers. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279673. Accessed 13 Sept 2018

  16. Wurm Y, Wang J, Riba-Grognuz O, Corona M, Nygaard S, Hunt BG et al (2011) The genome of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(14):5679–5684

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shen W, Xiong J (2019) TaxonKit: a cross-platform and efficient NCBI taxonomy toolkit. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/513523

  18. Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH (2015) Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods 12:59–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Natural Environment Research Council [grant NE/L00626X/1] and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [grant BB/K004204/1 and BB/M009513/1]. This research used Queen Mary’s Apocrita HPC facility, supported by QMUL Research-IT (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.438045).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ismail Moghul or Yannick Wurm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Moghul, I., Priyam, A., Wurm, Y. (2019). Choosing the Best Gene Predictions with GeneValidator. In: Kollmar, M. (eds) Gene Prediction. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1962. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-9172-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-9173-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics