Abstract
Many methods exist to study oncogenic signaling in lymphoma cells, each with certain strengths and weaknesses. The proximity ligation assay (PLA) is a technique used to examine protein-protein interactions in situ. PLA offers many advantages over traditional biochemical approaches to signaling in that it can detect both transient interactions, which are hard to capture otherwise, as well as protein interactions within large supramolecular signaling platforms that are often intractable to traditional biochemical methodologies. In addition, PLA can be adapted for use in lymphoma biopsy samples to translate findings from the lab. Implementation of PLA can complement many types of lymphoma research, and the methods presented herein can be adapted to a number of experimental settings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Young RM, Staudt LM (2013) Targeting pathological B cell receptor signalling in lymphoid malignancies. Nat Rev Drug Discov 12:229–243
Wu H, Fuxreiter M (2016) The structure and dynamics of higher-order assemblies: amyloids, signalosomes, and granules. Cell 165:1055–1066
Soderberg O, Gullberg M, Jarvius M, Ridderstrale K, Leuchowius KJ, Jarvius J, Wester K, Hydbring P, Bahram F, Larsson LG, Landegren U (2006) Direct observation of individual endogenous protein complexes in situ by proximity ligation. Nat Methods 3:995–1000
Weibrecht I, Leuchowius KJ, Clausson CM, Conze T, Jarvius M, Howell WM, Kamali-Moghaddam M, Soderberg O (2010) Proximity ligation assays: a recent addition to the proteomics toolbox. Expert Rev Proteomics 7:401–409
Soderberg O, Leuchowius KJ, Gullberg M, Jarvius M, Weibrecht I, Larsson LG, Landegren U (2008) Characterizing proteins and their interactions in cells and tissues using the in situ proximity ligation assay. Methods 45:227–232
Mocanu MM, Varadi T, Szollosi J, Nagy P (2011) Comparative analysis of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and proximity ligation assay (PLA). Proteomics 11:2063–2070
Phelan JD, Young RM, Webster DE, Roulland S, Wright GW, Kasbekar M, Shaffer AL 3rd, Ceribelli M, Wang JQ, Schmitz R, Nakagawa M, Bachy E, Huang DW, Ji Y, Chen L, Yang Y, Zhao H, Yu X, Xu W, Palisoc MM, Valadez RR, Davies-Hill T, Wilson WH, Chan WC, Jaffe ES, Gascoyne RD, Campo E, Rosenwald A, Ott G, Delabie J, Rimsza LM, Rodriguez FJ, Estephan F, Holdhoff M, Kruhlak MJ, Hewitt SM, Thomas CJ, Pittaluga S, Oellerich T, Staudt LM (2018) A multiprotein supercomplex controlling oncogenic signalling in lymphoma. Nature 560:387–391
O’Hurley G, Sjostedt E, Rahman A, Li B, Kampf C, Ponten F, Gallagher WM, Lindskog C (2014) Garbage in, garbage out: a critical evaluation of strategies used for validation of immunohistochemical biomarkers. Mol Oncol 8:783–798
Allalou A, Wahlby C (2009) BlobFinder, a tool for fluorescence microscopy image cytometry. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 94:58–65
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Young, R.M. (2019). Proximity Ligation Assay. In: Küppers, R. (eds) Lymphoma. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1956. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9151-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9151-8_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-9150-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-9151-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols