Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to describe a method used to evaluate gene expression and microRNAs (miRNAs) in bone cells or tissue using Reverse transcription and quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR), and a method to assess chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) on Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded (FFPE ) mouse bone tissue to detect both DNA and mRNA transcripts using the double digoxigenin (DIG) locked nucleic acid (LNA™) probes .
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Tajadini M, Panjehpour M, Javanmard SH (2014) Comparison of SYBR green and TaqMan methods in quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis of four adenosine receptor subtypes. Adv Biomed Res 3
Cassidy A, Jones J (2014) Developments in in situ hybridisation. Methods 70(1):39–45
Ogasawara T et al (2004) In situ expression of RANKL, RANK, osteoprotegerin and cytokines in osteoclasts of rat periodontal tissue. J Periodontal Res 39(1):42–49
Shwartz Y., Zelzer E. (2014) Nonradioactive in situ hybridization on skeletal tissue sections. In: Hilton MJ (ed). Skeletal development and repair, mcxxx. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, p. 203–215
Pfaffl MW (2001) A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT–PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 29:e45
Arabi L et al (2014) Upregulation of the miR-17-92 cluster and its two paraloga in osteosarcoma—reasons and consequences. Genes Cancer 5:56–63. https://doi.org/10.18632/genesandcancer.6
Allen-Rhoades W et al (2015) Cross-species identification of a plasma microRNA signature for detection, therapeutic monitoring, and prognosis in osteosarcoma. Cancer Med 4:977–988. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.438
Chen R, Li X, He B, Hu W (2017) MicroRNA-410 regulates autophagy-related gene ATG16L1 expression and enhances chemosensitivity via autophagy inhibition in osteosarcoma. Mol Med Rep. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.6149
Brennan MA et al (2014) Pre-clinical studies of bone regeneration with human bone marrow stromal cells and biphasic calcium phosphate. Stem Cell Res Ther 5(5):114
Vermeulen J, De Preter K, Lefever S, Nuytens J, De Vloed F, Derveaux S, Hellemans J, Speleman F, Vandesompele J (2011) Measurable impact of RNA quality on gene expression results from quantitative PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 39:e63
Imbeaud S, Graudens E, Boulanger V, Barlet X, Zaborski P, Eveno E, Mueller O, Schroeder A, Auffray C (2005) Towards standardization of RNA quality assessment using user-independent classifiers of microcapillary electrophoresis traces. Nucleic Acids Res 33:e56
D’Amico F, Skarmoutsou E, Stivala F (2009) State of the art in antigen retrieval for immunohistochemistry. J Immunol Methods 341:1–2, 1–18
Acknowledgment
Thanks to www.servier.fr for the free-access’ to the clipart used.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Moukengue, B., Amiaud, J., Jacques, C., Charrier, C., Ory, B., Lamoureux, F. (2019). Analysis of mRNA, miRNA, and DNA in Bone Cells by RT-qPCR and In Situ Hybridization. In: Idris, A. (eds) Bone Research Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1914. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8997-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8997-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-8996-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-8997-3
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols