Skip to main content
Book cover

Barley pp 53–71Cite as

Isolated Microspore Culture in Barley

  • Protocol
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1900))

Abstract

Isolated microspore culture (IMC) is the most efficient way to produce large numbers of doubled-haploid (DH) barley plants in a short time. Yet, while IMC is more cost-efficient and less labor-intensive than anther culture, it is technically more complex and requires more experienced personnel if it is to yield its full potential. In part, this is because of multiple and important interactions that exist between factors at its many different phases, including genotype effects as well. When every phase is fine-tuned, the protocol that is presented below yields a useful number of DHs with almost all genotypes and can allow the production of up to 300 DH plants from a single F1 plant in just a few months.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Protocol
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

References

  1. Weyen J (2009) Barley and wheat doubled haploids in breeding. In: Touraev A, Forster BP, Jain MS (eds) Advances in haploid production in higher plants. Springer Science+Business Media BV, Dordrecht, pp 179–187

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Forster BP, Thomas WTB (2005) Doubled haploids in genetics and plant breeding. Plant Breed Rev 25:57–88

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan SWL (2010) Chromosome engineering: power tools for plant genetics. Trends Biotechnol 28:605–610

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Li H, Devaux P (2005) Isolated microspore culture overperforms anther culture for green plant regeneration in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Acta Physiol Plant 27:611–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Devaux P, Kasha KJ (2009) Overview of barley doubled haploid production. In: Touraev A, Forster BP, Jain MS (eds) Advances in haploid production in higher plants. Springer Science+Business Media BV, Dordrecht, pp 47–63

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Mirzaei M, Kahrizi D, Rezaeizad A (2011) Androgenesis and spontaneous chromosome doubling in Hordeum vulgare L. researches of the first international conference (Babylon and Razi Universities). Euphrates J Agric Sci 3(9):248–252

    Google Scholar 

  7. Asif M (2013) Progress and opportunities of doubled haploid production. Series: SpringerBriefs in Plant Science 6, 75 pp

    Google Scholar 

  8. Li H, Devaux P (2003) High frequency regeneration of barley doubled haploid plants from isolated microspore culture. Plant Sci 164:379–386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Letarte J.E., Simion MM,·Kasha KJ. (2006) Arabinogalactans and arabinogalactan-proteins induce embryogenesis in wheat (Triticum aestivum L) microspore culture Plant Cell Rep 24: 691–698

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sorvari S, Schieder O (1987) Influence of sucrose and Melibiose on barley anther cultures in starch media. Plant Breed 99:164–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoekstra S, van Zijderveld MH, Heidekamp E et al (1993) Microspore culture of Hordeum vulgare L.: the influence of density and osmolality. Plant Cell Rep 12:661–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wojnarowiez G, Caredda S, Devaux P et al (2004) Barley anther culture: assessment of carbohydrate effects on embryo yield, green plant production and differential plastid development in relation with albinism. J Plant Physiol 161:747–775

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Burger DA (1988) Guidelines for autoclaving liquid media used in plant tissue culture. HortSci 23:1066–1069

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kasha KJ, Simion E, Oro R et al (2001) An improved in vitro technique for isolated microspore culture of barley. Euphytica 120:379–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Devaux P, Pickering R (2005) Haploids in the improvement of Poaceae. In: Palmer CE, Keller WA, Kasha KJ (eds) Haploids in crop improvement II. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 215–242

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Wheatley WG, Marsolais AA, Kasha KJ (1986) Microspore growth and anther staging in barley anther culture. Plant Cell Rep 5:47–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoekstra S, van Zijderveld MH, Louwerse JD et al (1992) Anther and microspore culture of Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Igri. Plant Sci 86:89–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang B, Sunderland N (1982) Temperature-stress pretreatment in barley anther culture. Ann Bot 49(1):77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jähne A, Lörz H (1995) Cereal microspore culture. Plant Sci 109:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Esteves P, Belzile F (2014) Improving the efficiency of isolated microspore culture in six-row spring barley: I-optimization of key physical factors. Plant Cell Rep 33(6):993–1001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Esteves P, Clermont I, Marchand S et al (2014) Improving the efficiency of isolated microspore culture in six-row spring barley: II-exploring novel growth regulators to maximize embryogenesis and reduce albinism. Plant Cell Rep 33(6):871–879

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. de Faria Maraschin S (2005) Androgenic switch in barley microspores. PhD thesis, Universiteit Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  23. Olmedilla A (2010) Microspore embryogenesis. In: Pua E-C, Davey MR (eds) Plant developmental biology—biotechnological perspectives, vol 2. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 27–44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Oleszczuk S, Sowa S, Zinny J (2006) Androgenic response to preculture stress in microspore cultures of barley. Protoplasma 228:95–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shim YS, Kasha KJ, Simion E et al (2006) The relationship between induction of embryogenesis and chromosome doubling in microspore cultures. Protoplasma 228:79–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to express our gratitude to Suzanne Marchand, Martine Jean, and Isabelle Clermont from the Département de phytologie of Université Laval for their help, support, and timely suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to François J. Belzile .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Esteves, P., Belzile, F.J. (2019). Isolated Microspore Culture in Barley. In: Harwood, W. (eds) Barley. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1900. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8944-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8944-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-8942-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-8944-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics