Abstract
When biopsying a fetal tissue like chorionic villi or amniotic fluid, there is a chance of getting some maternal material that could contaminate the fetal specimen and might lead to a misdiagnosis. Thus, all prenatal samples should be subjected to testing for maternal cell contamination. This is done using quantitative fluorescent PCR (QF-PCR) of short tandem repeat (STR) markers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hsu LY (1992) Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities through amniocentesis. In: Milunsky A (ed) Genetic disorders and the fetus: diagnosis, prevention and treatment, 3rd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Ledbetter DH, Zachary JM, Simpson JL et al (1992) Cytogenetic results from the U.S. collaborative study on CVS. Prenat Diagn 12(5):317–345
Ledbetter DH (1993) Prenatal cytogenetics: indications, accuracy and future directions. In: Simpson JL, Elias S (eds) Essentials of prenatal diagnosis. Churchill Livingstone, New York
Saura R, Roux D, Taine L et al (1994) Early amniocentesis versus chorionic villus sampling for fetal karyotyping. Lancet 344(8925):825–826
Weida J, Patil AS, Schubert FP et al (2017) Prevalence of maternal cell contamination in amniotic fluid samples. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 30(17):2133–2137. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2016.1240162
Nagan N, Faulkner NE, Curtis C et al (2011) Laboratory guidelines for detection, interpretation, and reporting of maternal cell contamination in prenatal analyses a report of the association for molecular pathology. J Mol Diagn 13(1):7–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2010.11.013
South ST, Lee C, Lamb AN et al (2013) ACMG standards and guidelines for constitutional cytogenomic microarray analysis, including postnatal and prenatal applications: revision 2013. Genet Med 15(11):901–909. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2013.129
Akolekar R, Beta J, Picciarelli G et al (2015) Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 45(1):16–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14636
Winsor EJ, Silver MP, Theve R et al (1996) Maternal cell contamination in uncultured amniotic fluid. Prenat Diagn 16(1):49–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199601)16:1<49::AID-PD808>3.0.CO;2-U
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Buchovecky, C.M., Nahum, O., Levy, B. (2019). Assessment of Maternal Cell Contamination in Prenatal Samples by Quantitative Fluorescent PCR (QF-PCR). In: Levy, B. (eds) Prenatal Diagnosis. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1885. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8889-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8889-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-8887-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-8889-1
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols