Skip to main content

Clinical Usefulness of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay for Prostate Cancer and Benign Prostate Hypertrophy (BPH)

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
3D Sponge-Matrix Histoculture

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1760))

Abstract

The histoculture drug response assay (HDRA) has been adapted to determine androgen sensitivity in Gelfoam histoculture of human benign prostatic tissue as well as prostate cancer. Gelfoam histoculture was used to measure androgen-independent and androgen-dependent growth of benign and malignant prostate tissue. The androgen-sensitivity index was significantly higher in 23 paired specimens of prostate cancer compared to benign prostate hypertrophy (BPH). Genistein decreased the androgen-sensitivity index of BPH and prostate cancer in Gelfoam® histoculture in a dose-dependent manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Logothetis CJ (2017) Improved outcomes in men with advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 377:388–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Geller J, Sionit LR, Connors K, Hoffman RM (1992) Measurement of androgen sensitivity in the human prostate in in vitro three-dimensional histoculture. Prostate 21:269–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Furukawa T, Kubota T, Hoffman RM (1995) Clinical applications of the histoculture drug response assay. Clin Cancer Res 1:305–311

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kubota T, Sasano N, Abe O, Nakao I, Kawamura E, Saito T, Endo M, Kimura K, Demura H, Sasano H, Nagura H, Ogawa N, Hoffman RM (1995) Potential of the histoculture drug response assay to contribute to cancer patient survival. Clin Cancer Res 1:1537–1543

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tanino H, Oura S, Hoffman RM, Kubota T, Furukawa T, Arimoto J, Yoshimasu T, Hirai I, Bessho T, Suzuma T, Sakurai T, Naito Y (2001) Acquisition of multidrug resistance in recurrent breast cancer demonstrated by the histoculture drug response assay. Anticancer Res 21:4083–4086

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Singh B, Li R, Xu L, Poluri A, Patel S, Shaha AR, Pfister D, Sherman E, Hoffman RM, Shah J (2002) Prediction of survival in patients with head and neck cancer using the histoculture drug response assay. Head Neck 24:437–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jung PS, Kim DY, Kim MB, Lee SW, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT, Hoffman RM, Nam JH (2013) Progression-free survival is accurately predicted in patients treated with chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer by the histoculture drug response assay in a prospective correlative clinical trial at a single institution. Anticancer Res 33:1029–1034

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Freeman A, Hoffman RM (1986) In vivo-like growth of human tumors in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 83:2694–2698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Vescio RA, Redfern CH, Nelson TJ, Ugoretz S, Stern PH, Hoffman RM (1987) In vivo-like drug response of human tumors growing in three-dimensional, gel-supported, primary culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84:5029–5033

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ji WB, Um JW, Ryu JS, Hong KD, Kim JS, Min BW, Joung SY, Lee JH, Kim YS (2017) Clinical significance of 5-fluorouracil chemosensitivity testing in patients with colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 37:2679–2682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Geller J, Partido C, Sionit L, Youngkin T, Nachtsheim D, Espanol M, Tan Y, Hoffman RM (1997) Comparison of androgen-independent growth and androgen-dependent growth in BPH and cancer tissue from the same radical prostatectomies in sponge-gel matrix histoculture. Prostate 31:250–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Adlercreutz H, Markkanen H, Watanabe S (1993) Plasma concentrations of phyto-estrogens in Japanese men. Lancet 342:1209–1210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pavese JM, Krishna SN, Bergan RC (2014) Genistein inhibits human prostate cancer cell detachment, invasion, and metastasis. Am J Clin Nutr 100(Suppl 1):431S–436S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Peterson G, Barnes SL (1993) Genistein and biochanin A inhibit the growth of human prostate cancer cells but not epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine autophosphorylation. Prostate 22:335–345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Geller J, Sionit L, Partido C, Li L, Tan X-Y, Youngkin T, Nachtsheim D, Hoffman RM (1998) Genistein inhibits the growth of human-patient BPH and prostate cancer in histoculture. Prostate 34:75–79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shao TC, Tindall DJ, Cunningham GR (1986) Age dependency of androgen and estrogen effects on incorporation of (3H)thymidine by rat prostates in organ culture. Prostate 8:349–362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. de Boer W, Bolt J, Kuiper GG, Brinkmann AO, Mulder E (1987) Analysis of steroid- and DNA-binding domains of the calf uterine androgen receptor by limited proteolysis. J Ster Biochem 28:9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kennealey G, Furr B (1991) Use of the nonsteroidal anti-androgen casodex in advanced prostatic carcinoma. Urol Clin North Am 18:99–110

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert M. Hoffman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Hoffman, R.M. (2018). Clinical Usefulness of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay for Prostate Cancer and Benign Prostate Hypertrophy (BPH). In: Hoffman, R. (eds) 3D Sponge-Matrix Histoculture. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1760. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7745-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7745-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7743-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7745-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics