Abstract
Recently developed high-throughput analytical techniques (e.g., protein mass spectrometry and nucleic acid sequencing) allow unprecedentedly sensitive, in-depth studies in molecular biology of cell proliferation, differentiation, aging, and death. However, the initial population of asynchronous cultured cells is highly heterogeneous by cell cycle stage, which complicates immediate analysis of some biological processes. Widely used cell synchronization protocols are time-consuming and can affect the finely tuned biochemical pathways leading to biased results. Besides, certain cell lines cannot be effectively synchronized. The current methodological challenge is thus to provide an effective tool for cell cycle phase-based population enrichment compatible with other required experimental procedures. Here, we describe an optimized approach to live cell FACS based on Hoechst 33342 cell-permeable DNA-binding fluorochrome staining. The proposed protocol is fast compared to traditional synchronization methods and yields reasonably pure fractions of viable cells for further experimental studies including high-throughput RNA-seq analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Vermeulen K, Van Bockstaele DR, Berneman ZN (2003) The cell cycle: a review of regulation, deregulation and therapeutic targets in cancer. Cell Prolif 36(3):131–149. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2184.2003.00266.x
Zhong W (2008) Timing cell-fate determination during asymmetric cell divisions. Curr Opin Neurobiol 18(5):472–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2008.10.005
Wirtz-Peitz F, Nishimura T, Knoblich JA (2008) Linking cell cycle to asymmetric division: Aurora-A phosphorylates the Par complex to regulate Numb localization. Cell 135(1):161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.049
Dey-Guha I, Wolfer A, Yeh AC, G Albeck J, Darp R, Leon E, Wulfkuhle J, Petricoin EF 3rd, Wittner BS, Ramaswamy S (2011) Asymmetric cancer cell division regulated by AKT. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(31):12845–12850. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109632108
Carpy A, Krug K, Graf S, Koch A, Popic S, Hauf S, Macek B (2014) Absolute proteome and phosphoproteome dynamics during the cell cycle of Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Fission Yeast). Mol Cell Proteomics 13(8):1925–1936. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M113.035824
Hsieh SY, Zhuang FH, Wu YT, Chen JK, Lee YL (2008) Profiling the proteome dynamics during the cell cycle of human hepatoma cells. Proteomics 8(14):2872–2884. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200800196
Marguerat S, Schmidt A, Codlin S, Chen W, Aebersold R, Bähler J (2012) Quantitative analysis of fission yeast transcriptomes and proteomes in proliferating and quiescent cells. Cell 151(3):671–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.019
Whitfield ML, Sherlock G, Saldanha AJ, Murray JI, Ball CA, Alexander KE, Matese JC, Perou CM, Hurt MM, Brown PO, Botstein D (2002) Identification of genes periodically expressed in the human cell cycle and their expression in tumors. Mol Biol Cell 13(6):1977–2000
Dominguez D, Tsai Y-H, Gomez N, Jha DK, Davis I, Wang Z (2016) A high-resolution transcriptome map of cell cycle reveals novel connections between periodic genes and cancer. Cell Res 26:946–962. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2016.84
Koval AP, Gogolevskaya IK, Tatosyan KA, Kramerov DA (2015) A 5′-3′ terminal stem in small non-coding RNAs extends their lifetime. Gene 555(2):464–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2014.10.061
Tatosyan KA, Kramerov DA (2016) Heat shock increases lifetime of a small RNA and induces its accumulation in cells. Gene 587(1):33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2016.04.025
McDavid A, Finak G, Gottardo R (2016) The contribution of cell cycle to heterogeneity in single-cell RNA-seq data. Nat Biotechnol 34:591–593. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3498
Velichko AK, Petrova NV, Razin SV, Kantidze OL (2017) Comparative analysis of the synchronization methods of normal and transformed human cells. Mol Biol 51:130–135. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026893316060200
Sonoda E (2006) Synchronization of cells. Subcell Biochem 40:415–418
Schorl C, Sedivy JM (2007) Analysis of cell cycle phases and progression in cultured mammalian cells. Methods 41(2):143–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.07.022
Ma HT, Poon RY (2017) Synchronization of HeLa cells. Methods Mol Biol 1524:189–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6603-5_12
Wanda PE (1996) Immunochemical detection of cell cycle synchronization in a human erythroid cell line, K562. Methods Cell Sci 18:143–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122165
Urbani L, Sherwood SW, Schimke RT (1995) Dissociation of nuclear and cytoplasmic cell cycle progression by drugs employed in cell synchronization. Exp Cell Res 219(1):159–168. https://doi.org/10.1006/excr.1995.1216
Li CJ (2017) Flow cytometry analysis of cell cycle and specific cell synchronization with butyrate. Methods Mol Biol 1524:149–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6603-5_9
Helmstetter CE (2015) A ten-year search for synchronous cells: obstacles, solutions, and practical applications. Front Microbiol 6:238. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00238
Shaw J, Payer K, Son S, Grover WH, Manalis SR (2012) A microfluidic “baby machine” for cell synchronization. Lab Chip 12(15):2656–2663. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2lc40277g
Banfalvi G (2017) Synchronization of mammalian cells and nuclei by centrifugal elutriation. Methods Mol Biol 1524:31–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6603-5_2
Ly T, Ahmad Y, Shlien A, Soroka D, Mills A, Emanuele MJ, Stratton MR, Lamond AI (2014) A proteomic chronology of gene expression through the cell cycle in human myeloid leukemia cells. eLife 3:e01630. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01630
O’Donnell EA, Ernst DN, Hingorani R (2013) Multiparameter flow cytometry: advances in high resolution analysis. Immune Netw 13(2):43–54. https://doi.org/10.4110/in.2013.13.2.43
Darzynkiewicz Z, Crissman H, Jacobberger JW (2004) Cytometry of the cell cycle: cycling through history. Cytometry A 58(1):21–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.20003
Kim KH, Sederstrom JM (2015) Assaying cell cycle status using flow cytometry. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 111:28.6.1–28.6.11. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142727.mb2806s111
Borisov VI, Korolkova OY, Kozhevnikov VS (2014) Application of flow-FISH for dynamic measurement of telomere length in cell division. Curr Protoc Cytom 69:8.14.1–8.14.10. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142956.cy0814s69
Yu H, Ernst L, Wagner M, Waggoner A (1992) Sensitive detection of RNAs in single cells by flow cytometry. Nucleic Acids Res 20(1):83–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/20.1.83
Yehuda Y, Blumenfeld B, Lehmann D, Simon I (2017) Genome-wide determination of mammalian replication timing by DNA content measurement. J Vis Exp (119):e55157. doi:https://doi.org/10.3791/55157.
Grolmusz VK, Tóth EA, Baghy K, Likó I, Darvasi O, Kovalszky I, Matkó J, Rácz K, Patócs A (2016) Fluorescence activated cell sorting followed by small RNA sequencing reveals stable microRNA expression during cell cycle progression. BMC Genomics 17:412. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2747-6
Juan G, Hernando E, Cordon-Cardo C (2002) Separation of live cells in different phases of the cell cycle for gene expression analysis. Cytometry 49(4):170–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.10173
Siemann DW, Keng PC (1986) Cell cycle specific toxicity of the Hoechst 33342 stain in untreated or irradiated murine tumor cells. Cancer Res 46(7):3556–3559
Reno F, Luchetti F, Vitale M, Gregorini A, Valentini M, Papa S (1996) Sorting of cells from different cell cycle phases using surface antigen expression. Methods Cell Sci 18(2):93–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122159
Zielke N, Edgar BA (2015) FUCCI sensors: powerful new tools for analysis of cell proliferation. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol 4:469–487. https://doi.org/10.1002/wdev.189
Wang D, Lu P, Liu Y, Chen L, Zhang R, Sui W, Dumitru AG, Chen X, Wen F, Ouyang HW, Ji J (2016) Isolation of live premature senescent cells using FUCCI technology. Sci Rep 6:30705. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30705
Uzbekov RE (2004) Analysis of the cell cycle and a method employing synchronized cells for study of protein expression at various stages of the cell cycle. Biochem Mosc 69(5):485–496
Acknowledgments
The work was supported by the Moscow State University Program of Development and by the Russian Science Foundation (grant #14-14-00088, sequencing and data analysis; grant #14-50-00029, optimization of RNA extraction and library preparation). Daria M. Potashnikova and Sergey A. Golyshev have contributed equally to this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Potashnikova, D.M. et al. (2018). FACS Isolation of Viable Cells in Different Cell Cycle Stages from Asynchronous Culture for RNA Sequencing. In: Barteneva, N., Vorobjev, I. (eds) Cellular Heterogeneity. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1745. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7680-5_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7680-5_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7679-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7680-5
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols