Abstract
The contribution of chemically reactive metabolites to drug-induced liver injury and other immune-mediated serious adverse drug reactions has been acknowledged as an important determinant of drug failure. Reasons for individual susceptibilities of patients that result in various forms and severities of adverse drug reactions are manifold. They involve factors such as the underlying diseases, individual genotypes of the immune system, and drug specific risk factors. Likewise, the characterizing of drug metabolizing pathways leading to bioactivation and reactive metabolite formation covalently modifying cellular macromolecules alone has been proven unsuccessful in relating bioactivation to adverse drug reactions. The emergence of sensitive and specific mass spectrometry methods has led to a myriad of experimental approaches trying to establish a causal link between reactive metabolite formation and drug-induced liver injury. Many of these failed. The main two reasons are: (1) Methods are overly sensitive or unspecific and flag many drugs that show a safe history of use in a large population. (2) Reactive metabolite screening methods are too generic and fail to detect drug-specific bioactivation pathways requiring alternative experimental approaches. As a consequence, testing paradigms that integrate knowledge of bioactivation pathways based on chemical structures (structural alerts), chemotype-specific experimental tools for reactive metabolite characterization, and the quantitative assessment of bioactivation pathways relative to “safe” metabolism and dose have emerged. Such strategies that characterize bioactivation potentials in the context of drug metabolism, pharmacokinetic properties, clinical dose and additional risk factors have been proposed and successfully applied across the pharmaceutical industry. Case studies and examples for successful risk assessment strategies and general principles to guide safe drug design are discussed in this chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Stepan AF et al (2011) Structural alert/reactive metabolite concept as applied in medicinal chemistry to mitigate the risk of idiosyncratic drug toxicity: a perspective based on the critical examination of trends in the top 200 drugs marketed in the United States. Chem Res Toxicol 24(9):1345–1410
Park BK et al (2011) Managing the challenge of chemically reactive metabolites in drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov 10(4):292–306
Evans DC et al (2004) Drug-protein adducts: an industry perspective on minimizing the potential for drug bioactivation in drug discovery and development. Chem Res Toxicol 17(1):3–16
Ma L et al (2008) Rapid screening of glutathione-trapped reactive metabolites by linear ion trap mass spectrometry with isotope pattern-dependent scanning and postacquisition data mining. Chem Res Toxicol 21(7):1477–1483
Nakayama S et al (2011) Combination of GSH trapping and time-dependent inhibition assays as a predictive method of drugs generating highly reactive metabolites. Drug Metab Dispos 39(7):1247–1254
Sakatis MZ et al (2012) Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds. Chem Res Toxicol 25(10):2067–2082
Thompson RA et al (2012) In vitro approach to assess the potential for risk of idiosyncratic adverse reactions caused by candidate drugs. Chem Res Toxicol 25:1616–1632
Brink A et al (2017) Minimizing the risk of chemically reactive metabolite formation of new drug candidates: implications for preclinical drug design. Drug Discov Today 22(5):751–756
Caldwell GW, Yan Z (2006) Screening for reactive intermediates and toxicity assessment in drug discovery. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 9(1):47–60
Muster W et al (2008) Computational toxicology in drug development. Drug Discov Today 13(7–8):303–310
Dalvie D, Kalgutkar AS, Chen W (2015) Practical approaches to resolving reactive metabolite liabilities in early discovery. Drug Metab Rev 47(1):56–70
Kalgutkar AS (2008) Role of bioactivation in idiosyncratic drug toxicity: structure–toxicity relationship. In: Elfarra AA (ed) Advances in bioactivation research. American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, Arlington, VA, p 440
Kalgutkar AS (2011) Handling reactive metabolite positives in drug discovery: what has retrospective structure-toxicity analyses taught us? Chem Biol Interact 192(1–2):46–55
Kalgutkar AS (2015) Should the incorporation of structural alerts be restricted in drug design? An analysis of structure-toxicity trends with aniline-based drugs. Curr Med Chem 22(4):438–464
Kalgutkar AS et al (2008) Toxicophores, reactive metabolites and drug safety: when is it a cause for concern? Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 1(4):515–531
Kalgutkar AS et al (2005) A comprehensive listing of bioactivation pathways of organic functional groups. Curr Drug Metab 6(3):161–225
Walgren JL, Mitchell MD, Thompson DC (2005) Role of metabolism in drug-induced idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity. Crit Rev Toxicol 35(4):325–361
Gramec D, Peterlin Masic L, Sollner Dolenc M (2014) Bioactivation potential of thiophene-containing drugs. Chem Res Toxicol 27(8):1344–1358
Lecoeur S et al (1994) Specificity of in vitro covalent binding of tienilic acid metabolites to human liver microsomes in relationship to the type of hepatotoxicity: comparison with two directly hepatotoxic drugs. Chem Res Toxicol 7(3):434–442
Brink A et al (2014) Post-acquisition analysis of untargeted accurate mass quadrupole time-of-flight MS(E) data for multiple collision-induced neutral losses and fragment ions of glutathione conjugates. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 28(24):2695–2703
Pahler A, Brink A (2013) Software aided approaches to structure-based metabolite identification in drug discovery and development. Drug Discov Today Technol 10(1):e207–e217
Feng S, He X (2013) Mechanism-based inhibition of CYP450: an indicator of drug-induced hepatotoxicity. Curr Drug Metab 14(9):921–945
Kalgutkar AS, Obach RS, Maurer TS (2007) Mechanism-based inactivation of cytochrome P450 enzymes: chemical mechanisms, structure-activity relationships and relationship to clinical drug-drug interactions and drug reactions. Curr Drug Metab 8(5):407–447
Orr ST et al (2012) Mechanism-based inactivation (MBI) of cytochrome P450 enzymes: structure-activity relationships and discovery strategies to mitigate drug-drug interaction risks. J Med Chem 55(11):4896–4933
Argikar UA, Mangold JB, Harriman SP (2011) Strategies and chemical design approaches to reduce the potential for formation of reactive metabolic species. Curr Top Med Chem 11(4):419–449
Baillie TA, Davis MR (1993) Mass spectrometry in the analysis of glutathione conjugates. Biol Mass Spectrom 22(6):319–325
Baillie TA et al (1989) The use of mass spectrometry in the study of chemically-reactive drug metabolites. Application of MS/MS and LC/MS to the analysis of glutathione- and related S-linked conjugates of N-methylformamide. J Pharm Biomed Anal 7(12):1351–1360
Castro-Perez J et al (2005) A high-throughput liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method for screening glutathione conjugates using exact mass neutral loss acquisition. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 19(6):798–804
Pearson PG et al (1988) Applications of tandem mass spectrometry to the characterization of derivatized glutathione conjugates. Studies with S-(N-methylcarbamoyl)glutathione, a metabolite of the antineoplastic agent N-methylformamide. Biomed Environ Mass Spectrom 16(1–12):51–56
Rashed MS et al (1989) Application of liquid chromatography/thermospray mass spectrometry to studies on the formation of glutathione and cysteine conjugates from monomethylcarbamate metabolites of bambuterol. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 3(10):360–363
Soglia JR et al (2004) The development of a higher throughput reactive intermediate screening assay incorporating micro-bore liquid chromatography-micro-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry and glutathione ethyl ester as an in vitro conjugating agent. J Pharm Biomed Anal 36(1):105–116
Soglia JR et al (2006) A semiquantitative method for the determination of reactive metabolite conjugate levels in vitro utilizing liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and novel quaternary ammonium glutathione analogues. Chem Res Toxicol 19(3):480–490
Dieckhaus CM et al (2005) Negative ion tandem mass spectrometry for the detection of glutathione conjugates. Chem Res Toxicol 18(4):630–638
Zhu M et al (2007) Detection and structural characterization of glutathione-trapped reactive metabolites using liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry and mass defect filtering. Anal Chem 79(21):8333–8341
Argoti D et al (2005) Cyanide trapping of iminium ion reactive intermediates followed by detection and structure identification using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Chem Res Toxicol 18(10):1537–1544
Rousu T, Tolonen A (2011) Characterization of cyanide-trapped methylated metabonates formed during reactive drug metabolite screening in vitro. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 25(10):1382–1390
Inoue K et al (2009) A trapping method for semi-quantitative assessment of reactive metabolite formation using [35S]cysteine and [14C]cyanide. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 24(3):245–254
Stachulski AV (2011) Chemistry and reactivity of acyl glucuronides. Curr Drug Metab 12(3):215–221
Zhong S et al (2015) A new rapid in vitro assay for assessing reactivity of acyl glucuronides. Drug Metab Dispos 43(11):1711–1717
Gan J et al (2005) Dansyl glutathione as a trapping agent for the quantitative estimation and identification of reactive metabolites. Chem Res Toxicol 18(5):896–903
Takakusa H et al (2009) Quantitative assessment of reactive metabolite formation using 35S-labeled glutathione. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 24(1):100–107
Fowler S, Zhang H (2008) In vitro evaluation of reversible and irreversible cytochrome P450 inhibition: current status on methodologies and their utility for predicting drug-drug interactions. AAPS J 10(2):410–424
Bauman JN et al (2009) Can in vitro metabolism-dependent covalent binding data distinguish hepatotoxic from nonhepatotoxic drugs? An analysis using human hepatocytes and liver S-9 fraction. Chem Res Toxicol 22(2):332–340
Nakayama S et al (2009) A zone classification system for risk assessment of idiosyncratic drug toxicity using daily dose and covalent binding. Drug Metab Dispos 37(9):1970–1977
Obach RS et al (2008) Can in vitro metabolism-dependent covalent binding data in liver microsomes distinguish hepatotoxic from nonhepatotoxic drugs? An analysis of 18 drugs with consideration of intrinsic clearance and daily dose. Chem Res Toxicol 21(9):1814–1822
Chen M, Borlak J, Tong W (2016) A model to predict severity of drug-induced liver injury in humans. Hepatology 64(3):931–940
Schadt S et al (2015) Minimizing DILI risk in drug discovery – a screening tool for drug candidates. Toxicol In Vitro 30(1 Pt B):429–437
Hong F, Freeman ML, Liebler DC (2005) Identification of sensor cysteines in human Keap1 modified by the cancer chemopreventive agent sulforaphane. Chem Res Toxicol 18(12):1917–1926
Hong F et al (2005) Specific patterns of electrophile adduction trigger Keap1 ubiquitination and Nrf2 activation. J Biol Chem 280(36):31768–31775
Shin NY et al (2007) Protein targets of reactive electrophiles in human liver microsomes. Chem Res Toxicol 20(6):859–867
Tzouros M, Pahler A (2009) A targeted proteomics approach to the identification of peptides modified by reactive metabolites. Chem Res Toxicol 22(5):853–862
Hanzlik RP, Fang J, Koen YM (2009) Filling and mining the reactive metabolite target protein database. Chem Biol Interact 179(1):38–44
Hanzlik RP et al (2007) The reactive metabolite target protein database (TPDB)—a web-accessible resource. BMC Bioinformatics 8:95
Hanzlik RP, Koen YM, Fang J (2013) Bioinformatic analysis of 302 reactive metabolite target proteins. Which ones are important for cell death? Toxicol Sci 135(2):390–401
Kim SH, Naisbitt DJ (2016) Update on advances in research on idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res 8(1):3–11
Singer JB et al (2010) A genome-wide study identifies HLA alleles associated with lumiracoxib-related liver injury. Nat Genet 42(8):711–714
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Pähler, A. (2018). Reactive Metabolite Assessment in Drug Discovery and Development in Support of Safe Drug Design. In: Chen, M., Will, Y. (eds) Drug-Induced Liver Toxicity. Methods in Pharmacology and Toxicology. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7677-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7677-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7676-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7677-5
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols