Skip to main content

Antibody-Based Detection of Global Nuclear DNA Methylation in Cells, Tissue Sections, and Mammalian Embryos

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
DNA Methylation Protocols

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1708))

Abstract

Immunostaining is widely used in cell biology for the in situ detection of proteins in fixed cells. The method is based on the specificity of antibodies for recognizing and binding to a selected target, combined with immunolabeling techniques for microscopic imaging. Antibodies with high specificities for modified nucleotides have also been widely developed, and among those, antibodies that recognize modified cytosine: 5-methylcytosine (5mC), and more recently, its derivates 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), 5-formylcytosine (5fC) and 5-carboxylcytosine (5caC). To allow for their detection, primary antibody signals can be amplified using secondary antibodies coupled to fluorophores for immunofluorescence, or other molecules for immunocytochemistry.

Immunostaining can be used to gain information on the spatial distribution and levels of DNA methylation states within the nucleus. Although the resolution remains quite low in genomic terms, advanced microscopy techniques and image analysis can obtain detailed spatial information content from immunostained sites. The technique complements genomic approaches that permit the assessment of DNA methylation on specific sequences, but that cannot provide global nuclear spatial context. Immunostaining is an accessible method of great benefit in several cases: when working with limited material (such as embryos or primary cells), to quickly assess at the level of individual cells the effect of siRNA, drugs, or biological processes that promote or inhibit DNA methylation or demethylation, or to study the 3D nuclear organization of regions with high DNA methylation, such as constitutive heterochromatin.

Here, we review and outline protocols for the fluorescent and enzymatic immunodetection of DNA methylation in the nuclei of cells, tissue sections, and mammalian embryos.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bird A (2002) DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev 16:6–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Reddington JP, Pennings S, Meehan RR (2013) Non-canonical functions of the DNA methylome in gene regulation. Biochem J 451:13–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rothbart SB, Strahl BD (2014) Interpreting the language of histone and DNA modifications. Biochim Biophys Acta 1839:627–643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Politz JC, Scalzo D, Groudine M (2013) Something silent this way forms: the functional organization of the repressive nuclear compartment. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 29:241–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Meehan RR, Dunican DS, Ruzov A et al (2005) Epigenetic silencing in embryogenesis. Exp Cell Res 309:241–249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Beaujean N (2014) Histone post-translational modifications in preimplantation mouse embryos and their role in nuclear architecture. Mol Reprod Dev 81:100–112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wongtawan T, Taylor JE, Lawson KA et al (2011) Histone H4K20me3 and HP1α are late heterochromatin markers in development, but present in undifferentiated embryonic stem cells. J Cell Sci 124:1878–1890

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu H, Zhang Y (2014) Reversing DNA methylation: mechanisms, genomics, and biological functions. Cell 156:45–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ficz G, Branco MR, Seisenberger S et al (2011) Dynamic regulation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse ES cells and during differentiation. Nature 473:398–402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shen L, Zhang Y (2013) 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine: generation, fate, and genomic distribution. Curr Opin Cell Biol 25:289–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Nestor CE, Ottaviano R, Reinhardt D et al (2015) Rapid reprogramming of epigenetic and transcriptional profiles in mammalian culture systems. Genome Biol 16:11

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Booth MJ, Ost TW, Beraldi D et al (2013) Oxidative bisulfite sequencing of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Nat Protoc 8:1841–1851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Nestor C, Ruzov A, Meehan R et al (2010) Enzymatic approaches and bisulfite sequencing cannot distinguish between 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in DNA. BioTechniques 48:317–319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reynaud C, Bruno C, Boullanger P et al (1992) Monitoring of urinary excretion of modified nucleosides in cancer patients using a set of six monoclonal antibodies. Cancer Lett 61:255–262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Barbin A, Montpellier C, Kokalj-Vokac N et al (1994) New sites of methylcytosine-rich DNA detected on metaphase chromosomes. Hum Genet 94:684–692

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Piyathilake C, Niveleau A, Grizzle W (2004) Role of global methylation of DNA in lung carcinoma (Ch. 10). In: Hayat MA (ed) Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization of human carcinomas. Elsevier Acad. Press, Burlington, MA, pp 181–187

    Google Scholar 

  17. Keshet I, Schlesinger Y, Farkash S et al (2006) Evidence for an instructive mechanism of de novo methylation in cancer cells. Nat Genet 38:149–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Salvaing J, Aguirre-Lavin T, Boulesteix C et al (2012) 5-Methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine spatiotemporal profiles in the mouse zygote. PLoS One 7:e38156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu H, D’Alessio AC, Ito S et al (2011) Genome-wide analysis of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine distribution reveals its dual function in transcriptional regulation in mouse embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev 25:679–684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Thomson JP, Lempiäinen H, Hackett JA et al (2012) Non-genotoxic carcinogen exposure induces defined changes in the 5-hydroxymethylome. Genome Biol 13:R93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Inoue A, Shen L, Dai Q et al (2011) Generation and replication-dependent dilution of 5fC and 5caC during mouse preimplantation development. Cell Res 21:1670–1676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Jin SG, Jiang Y, Qiu R et al (2011) 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine is strongly depleted in human cancers but its levels do not correlate with IDH1 mutations. Cancer Res 71:7360–7365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Li Y, O’Neill C (2013) 5′-Methylcytosine and 5′-hydroxymethylcytosine each provide epigenetic information to the mouse zygote. PLoS One 8:e63689

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Salvaing J, Li Y, Beaujean N, O’Neill C (2014) Determinants of valid measurements of global changes in 5′-methylcytosine and 5′-hydroxymethylcytosine by immunolocalisation in the early embryo. Reprod Fertil Dev 27:755–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Tatiana Chebotareva, Cristina Aguilar, and other members of the S.P lab for their help in developing some of the protocols presented, and we thank Richard Meehan for helpful suggestions. All present and past members from N. B’s lab are acknowledged for their work and contributions, especially Claire Boulesteix. We wish to acknowledge the Niveleau lab for their development of the original 5mC antibody and some of the protocols outlined in this chapter. N.A.A.H. is a recipient of a MARA (Malaysia) scholarship; work in S.P.’s lab is supported by the BBSRC and the BHF. Work in N.B.’s lab is supported by the REVIVE Labex (Investissement d'Avenir, ANR-10-LABX-73).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nathalie Beaujean or Sari Pennings .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Beaujean, N., Salvaing, J., Hadi, N.A.A., Pennings, S. (2018). Antibody-Based Detection of Global Nuclear DNA Methylation in Cells, Tissue Sections, and Mammalian Embryos. In: Tost, J. (eds) DNA Methylation Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1708. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7481-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7481-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7479-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7481-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics