Skip to main content

Challenges and Opportunities in Enabling High-Throughput, Miniaturized High Content Screening

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
High Content Screening

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1683))

Abstract

Within the Drug Discovery industry, there is a growing recognition of the value of high content screening (HCS), particularly as researchers aim to screen compounds and identify hits using more physiologically relevant in vitro cell-based assays. Image-based high content screening, with its combined ability to yield multiparametric data, provide subcellular resolution, and enable cell population analysis, is well suited to this challenge. While HCS has been in routine use for over a decade, a number of hurdles have historically prohibited very large, miniaturized high-throughput screening efforts with this platform. Suitable hardware and consumables for conducting 1536-well HCS have only recently become available, and developing a reliable informatics framework to accommodate the scale of high-throughput HCS data remains a considerable challenge. Additionally, innovative approaches are needed to interpret the large volumes of content-rich information generated. Despite these hurdles, there has been a growing interest in screening large compound inventories using this platform. Here, we outline the infrastructure developed and applied at Bristol-Myers Squibb for 1536-well high content screening and discuss key lessons learned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zock JM (2009) Applications of high content screening in life science research. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 12:870–876

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boutros M, Heigwer F, Laufer C (2015) Microscopy-based high-content screening. Cell 163:1314–1325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nierode G, Kwon PS, Dordick JS et al (2016) Cell-based assay design for high-content screening of drug candidates. J Microbiol Biotechnol 26(2):213–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Munos B (2009) Lessons from 60 years of pharmaceutical innovation. Nat Rev Drug Discov 8:959–968. doi:10.1038/nrd2961

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pammolli F, Magazzini L, Riccaboni M (2011) The productivity crisis in pharmaceutical R&D. Nat Rev Drug Discov 10:428–438. doi:10.1038/nrd3405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Swinney DC (2013) Phenotypic vs. target-based drug discovery for first-in-class medicines. Clin Pharmacol Ther 93:299–301. doi:10.1038/clpt.2012.1236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Swinney DC, Anthony J (2011) How were new medicines discovered? Nat Rev Drug Discov 10:507–519. doi:10.1038/nrd3480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eglen R, Reisine T (2011) Primary cells and stem cells in drug discovery: emerging tools for high-throughput screening. Assay Drug Dev Technol 9:108–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Eglen RM, Reisine T (2010) Human kinome drug discovery and the emerging importance of atypical allosteric inhibitors. Expert Opin Drug Discovery 5:277–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gasparri F, Sola F, Bandiera T et al (2008) High-content analysis of kinase activity in cells. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 11:523–536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bertekap RL Jr, Burford NT, Li Z et al (2015) High-throughput screening for allosteric modulators of GPCRs. Methods Mol Biol 1335:223–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnston P (2008) Automated high content screening. In: Haney S (ed) High content screening: science, techniques and applications. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ellson R, Mutz M, Browning B et al (2003) Transfer of low Nanoliter volumes between Microplates using focused acoustics – automation considerations. J Assoc Lab Autom 8:29–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bruner J, Liacos J, Siu A et al (2003) Work-cell approach to automating high content screening. J Assoc Lab Autom 8:66–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Unterreiner V, Gabriel D (2011) When high content screening meets high throughput. Drug Discov World 13:19

    Google Scholar 

  16. Collins MA (2009) Generating ‘omic knowledge’: the role of informatics in high content screening. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 12:917–925

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Buchser W, Collins M, Garyantes T, et al. Assay Development Guidelines for Image-Based High Content Screening, High Content Analysis and High Content Imaging. 2012 Oct 1 [Updated 2014 Sep 22]. In: Sittampalam GS, Coussens NP, Brimacombe K, et al., editors. Assay Guidance Manual [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): Eli Lilly & Company and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; 2004-.Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK100913/

  18. Young DW, Bender A, Hoyt J et al (2008) Integrating high-content screening and ligand-target prediction to identify mechanism of action. Nat Chem Biol 4:59–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jackson D, Lenard M, Zelensky A et al (2010) HCS road: an enterprise system for integrated HCS data management and analysis. J Biomol Screen 15:882–891. doi:10.1177/1087057110374233. Epub 1087057110372010 Jul 1087057110374216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Feng Y, Mitchison TJ, Bender A et al (2009) Multi-parameter phenotypic profiling: using cellular effects to characterize small-molecule compounds. Nat Rev Drug Discov 8:567–578. doi:10.1038/nrd2876

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Low J, Chakravartty A, Blosser W et al (2009) Phenotypic fingerprinting of small molecule cell cycle kinase inhibitors for drug discovery. Curr Chem Genomics 3:13–21. doi:10.2174/1875397300903010013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Low J, Stancato L, Lee J et al (2008) Prioritizing hits from phenotypic high-content screens. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 11:338–345

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank members of the Core Automation team including Jennifer Zewinski, Jeffrey Cheicko, Lisa Simoni, David Connors, Christian Ferrante and Jessica Devito for providing critical support in enabling high-throughput HCS assays. Additionally, we acknowledge the efforts of Michael Lenard and Donald Jackson in the development and implementation of HCS Road, as well as informatics support to enable phenotypic clustering. Judi Wardwell-Swanson and Yanhua Hu were instrumental in the development and execution of the phenotypic clustering methods described. Finally, thanks are due to Edward Pineda for providing us with the CADD drawings in Fig. 3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debra Nickischer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Nickischer, D., Elkin, L., Cloutier, N., O’Connell, J., Banks, M., Weston, A. (2018). Challenges and Opportunities in Enabling High-Throughput, Miniaturized High Content Screening. In: Johnston, P., Trask, O. (eds) High Content Screening. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1683. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7357-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7357-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7355-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7357-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics