Skip to main content

Long-Term Imaging of DNA Damage and Cell Cycle Progression in Budding Yeast Using Spinning Disk Confocal Microscopy

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Genome Instability

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1672))

Abstract

Live cell imaging can monitor biological processes in time and space by providing quantitative measurements of cell behavior on a single-cell basis and in live conditions. However the illumination required to visualize fluorescently tagged endogenous proteins often perturbs cellular physiology, a problem particularly acute for yeast cells that are small, highly photosensitive and with scarce protein content. Analyzing the activation of the DNA damage response (DDR) in various yeast mutants or growth conditions, as well as its consequences for cell cycle progression and cell viability over extended periods of time therefore requires a special microscopy setup that does not by itself create DNA damage or perturb cell growth. Here, we provide a quick guide, strains and advice for imaging the DDR in S. cerevisiae for extended time (3–12 h) using spinning-disk confocal microscopy in conditions of limited photobleaching and photodamage. DDR is a conserved mechanism that allows the cell to respond to various stresses, especially those altering DNA integrity or topology. Acquiring time-lapse images of the DDR at high temporal and spatial resolution is of great interest, in particular when studying the effects of mutations or drugs which compromise genomic stability and cell cycle progression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. di Pietro F, Echard A, Morin X (2016) Regulation of mitotic spindle orientation: an integrated view. EMBO Rep 17:1106–1130

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Park S, Greco V, Cockburn K (2016) Live imaging of stem cells: answering old questions and raising new ones. Curr Opin Cell Biol 43:30–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Miné-Hattab J, Rothstein R (2013) DNA in motion during double-strand break repair. Trends Cell Biol 23:529–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carlton PM, Boulanger J, Kervrann C et al (2010) Fast live simultaneous multiwavelength four-dimensional optical microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:16016–16022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Magidson V, Khodjakov A (2013) Circumventing photodamage in live-cell microscopy. Methods Cell Biol 114:545–560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Inoué S, Inoué T (2002) Direct-view high-speed confocal scanner: the CSU-10. Methods Cell Biol 70:87–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Oreopoulos J, Berman R, Browne M (2014) Spinning-disk confocal microscopy: present technology and future trends. Methods Cell Biol 123:153–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ettinger A, Wittmann T (2014) Fluorescence live cell imaging. Methods Cell Biol 123:77–94

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Frigault MM, Lacoste J, Swift JL, Brown CM (2009) Live-cell microscopy – tips and tools. J Cell Sci 122:753–767

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jena NR (2012) DNA damage by reactive species: mechanisms, mutation and repair. J Biosci 37:503–517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Davies MJ (2003) Singlet oxygen-mediated damage to proteins and its consequences. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 305:761–770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lisby M, Rothstein R, Mortensen UH (2001) Rad52 forms DNA repair and recombination centers during S phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U A 98:8276–8282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Khmelinskii A, Lawrence C, Roostalu J, Schiebel E (2007) Cdc14-regulated midzone assembly controls anaphase B. J Cell Biol 177:981–993

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lisby M, Rothstein R (2004) DNA damage checkpoint and repair centers. Curr Opin Cell Biol 16:328–334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Horigome C, Dion V, Seeber A et al (2015) Visualizing the spatiotemporal dynamics of DNA damage in budding yeast. Methods Mol Biol Clifton NJ 1292:77–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E et al (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Alkaabi KM, Yafea A, Ashraf SS (2005) Effect of pH on thermal-and chemical-induced denaturation of GFP. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 126:149–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank D. Tamborrini and S. Piatti (CRBM, Montpellier) for the initial set-up of yeast live cell imaging, V. Georget (BioCampus MRI Imaging Facility) for endless support, as well as R. Rothstein (Columbia U., New York) and E. Schiebel (ZMBH, Heidelberg) for providing yeast strains and constructs. RM was a Master student from University Milan-Bicocca (Italy) holding an Erasmus+ stipend from the EU. ES thanks Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer (ARC) and Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-14-CE11-0007-03) for funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Etienne Schwob .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Movie Captions

Wild-type strain (E3416) containing Rad52-GFP (green) and mCherry-tubulin (red) grown at 30 °C on a FluoroDish and imaged every 2 min for 6 h under low illumination conditions (laser GFP 1%, Cherry 3%, 11 z-planes of 300 ms each). Note that cells divide rapidly without showing persistent Rad52-GFP foci (MP4 2662 kb)

Wild-type strain (E3416) containing Rad52-GFP (green) and mCherry-tubulin (red) grown at 30 °C on a FluoroDish and imaged every min for 3 h under higher illumination conditions (laser GFP 3%, Cherry 3%, 11 z-planes of 300 ms each). Due to the three times stronger GFP illumination and increased frequency (every min), most cells show persistent Rad52-GFP foci in G2/metaphase but still divide, albeit more slowly. Note that Movies 1 and 2 were performed on the same day with comparable laser power output (MP4 2269 kb)

Wild-type strain (E3416) containing Rad52-GFP (green) and mCherry-Tub1 (red) grown at 30 °C in the presence of 20 μM camptothecin (CPT, Topoisomerase I inhibitor) and imaged every 2 min for 12 h with 488 nm (5%) and 561 nm (6.5%) channels to visualize Rad52-GFP foci and mitotic spindles (mCherry-Tub1), respectively. Note that the cell cycle is severely extended with cells showing persistent Rad52-GFP foci from the second cell cycle (MP4 4360 kb)

mec1Δ sml1Δ strain (E5357) containing Rad52-GFP (green) and mCherry-Tub1 (red) grown at 30 °C with 20 μM camptothecin and imaged every 2 min for 12 h with 488 nm (5%) and 561 nm (6.5%) fluorescence excitation. Note that cells show Rad52 foci in the 1st cycle but divide and rebud rapidly without dismantling their Rad52-GFP foci. This will lead to cell death a few cycles later. Movies 3 and 4 were performed on successive days with comparable laser output, but after laser power was calibrated down compared to Movies 1 and 2 (MP4 10291 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Montecchi, R., Schwob, E. (2018). Long-Term Imaging of DNA Damage and Cell Cycle Progression in Budding Yeast Using Spinning Disk Confocal Microscopy. In: Muzi-Falconi, M., Brown, G. (eds) Genome Instability. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1672. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7306-4_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7306-4_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7305-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7306-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics