Advertisement

The Use of Bacterial Repair Endonucleases in the Comet Assay

  • Andrew R. CollinsEmail author
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1641)

Abstract

The comet assay is a sensitive electrophoretic method for measuring DNA breaks at the level of single cells, used widely in genotoxicity experiments, in biomonitoring, and in fundamental research. Its sensitivity and range of application are increased by the incorporation of an extra step, after lysis of agarose-embedded cells, in which the DNA is digested with lesion-specific endonucleases (DNA repair enzymes of bacterial or phage origin). Enzymes with specificity for oxidized purines, oxidized pyrimidines, alkylated bases, UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers, and misincorporated uracil have been employed. The additional enzyme-sensitive sites, over and above the strand breaks detected in the standard comet assay, give a quantitative estimate of the number of specific lesions present in the cells.

Key words

Comet assay DNA damage Altered bases Electrophoresis Repair endonucleases 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank Katja Lange and Anna Tirado for excellent technical support.

References

  1. 1.
    Collins AR, Duthie SJ, Dobson VL (1993) Direct enzymic detection of endogenous oxidative base damage in human lymphocyte DNA. Carcinogenesis 14:1733–1735CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dusinska M, Collins A (1996) Detection of oxidised purines and UV-induced photoproducts in DNA of single cells, by inclusion of lesion-specific enzymes in the comet assay. Altern Lab Anim 24:405–411Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Collins AR, Dusinska M, Horska A (2001) Detection of alkylation damage in human lymphocyte DNA with the comet assay. Acta Biochim Pol 48:611–614PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Collins AR, Mitchell DL, Zunino A, de Wit J, Busch D (1997) UV-sensitive rodent mutant cell lines of complementation groups 6 and 8 differ phenotypically from their human counterparts. Environ Mol Mutagen 29:152–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duthie SJ, McMillan P (1997) Uracil misincorporation in human DNA detected using single cell gel electrophoresis. Carcinogenesis 18:1709–1714CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Duthie SJ, Ma A, Ross MA, Collins AR (1996) Antioxidant supplementation decreases oxidative DNA damage in human lymphocytes. Cancer Res 56:1291–1295PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Azqueta A, Arbillaga L, Lopez de Cerain A, Collins A (2013) Enhancing the sensitivity of the comet assay as a genotoxicity test, by combining it with bacterial repair enzyme FPG. Mutagenesis 28:271–277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huk A, Izak-Nau E, El Yamani N, Uggerud H, Vadset M, Zasonska B, Duschl A, Dusinska M (2015) Impact of nanosilver on various DNA lesions and HPRT gene mutations – effects of charge and surface coating. Part Fibre Toxicol 12:25CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Azqueta A, Collins AR (2013) The essential comet assay: a comprehensive guide to measuring DNA damage and repair. Arch Toxicol 87:949–968CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shaposhnikov S, Azqueta A, Henriksson S, Meier S, Gaivão I, Huskisson NH, Smart A, Brunborg G, Nilsson M, Collins AR (2010) Twelve-gel slide format optimised for comet assay and fluorescent in situ hybridisation. Toxicol Lett 195:31–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Collins AR, Horvathova E (2001) Oxidative DNA damage, antioxidants and DNA repair; applications of the comet assay. Biochem Soc Trans 29:337–341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Collins AR, Azqueta Oscoz A, Brunborg G et al (2008) The comet assay: topical issues. Mutagenesis 23:143–151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Collins AR, Cadet J, Moller L, Poulsen HE, Vina J (2004) Are we sure we know how to measure 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine in DNA from human cells? Arch Biochem Biophys 423:57–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Speit G, Schütz P, Bonzheim I, Trenz K, Hoffmann H (2004) Sensitivity of the protein towards alkylation damage in the comet assay. Toxicol Lett 146:151–158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Berdal KG, Johansen RF, Seeberg E (1998) Release of normal bases from intact DNA by a native DNA repair enzyme. EMBO J 17:363–367CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith CC, O'Donovan MR, Martin EA (2006) hOGG1 recognizes oxidative damage using the comet assay with greater specificity than FPG or ENDOIII. Mutagenesis 21(3):185–190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NutritionUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations