Advertisement

Surface Acoustic Wave Lysis and Ion-Exchange Membrane Quantification of Exosomal MicroRNA

  • Katherine E. Richards
  • David B. Go
  • Reginald Hill
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1580)

Abstract

MicroRNA detection and quantification are commonly explored techniques for diagnostic and prognostic predictions. Typically, microRNAs are extracted and purified from a biological source, converted into complementary DNA (cDNA), and amplified using real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The number of RT-PCR cycles required to reach the threshold of detection provides a relative quantification of the target microRNA when this data is normalized to the quantity of a control microRNA. This methodology has several drawbacks, including the need to artificially amplify the target microRNA for detection as well as quantification errors that can occur due to expression level differences of the control microRNAs for normalization in various sample sources. Here, we provide a technique to quantify actual concentrations of target microRNAs directly from any biological source without the requirement of these additional steps. In addition, we describe an alternative approach for obtaining exosomal microRNAs directly from biological samples without the use of harsh detergents and RNA isolation.

Key words

MicroRNA RNA Detection Quantification Exosomes SAW Microfluidics Ion-exchange Membrane Biosensor 

References

  1. 1.
    Taller D, Richards K, Slouka Z et al (2015) On-Chip surface acoustic wave lysis and ion-exchange nanomembrane detection of exosomal RNA for pancreatic cancer study and diagnosis. Lab Chip 15:1656–1666CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Senapati S, Slouka Z, Shah S et al (2014) An ion-exchange nanomembrane sensor for detection of nucleic acids using a surface charge inversion phenomenon. Biosens Bioelectron 60:92–100CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Slouka Z, Senapati S, Chang H (2014) Microfluidic systems with ion-selective membranes. Annu Rev Anal Chem 7:317–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gallo A, Tandon M, Alevizos I, Illei GG (2012) The majority of MicroRNAs detectable in serum and saliva is concentrated in exosomes. PLoS One 7(3):e30679CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Länge K, Rapp B, Rapp M (2008) Surface acoustic wave biosensors: a review. Anal Bioanal Chem 391:1509–1519CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Taller D, Go D, Chang H (2013) Modulated exponential films generated by surface acoustic waves and their role in liquid wicking and aerosolization at a pinned drop. Physical Review E 87:053004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hartman CS, Abbott BP (1989) Overview of design challenges for single phase unidirectional SAW filters. Ultrasonics Symposium IEEE 1: 79–89Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shilton R, Tan M, Yeo L et al (2008) Particle concentration and mixing in microdrops driven by focused acoustic waves. J Appl Phys 104:014910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Qi A, Yeo L, Friend J et al (2009) The extraction of liquid, protein molecules and yeast cells from paper through surface acoustic wave atomization. Lab Chip 10:470–476CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Taller D (2015) Surface acoustic wave microfluidics: droplets, pinned liquid films, and biodetection. Dissertation, University of Notre DameGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katherine E. Richards
    • 1
  • David B. Go
    • 2
    • 3
  • Reginald Hill
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological Sciences, Harper Cancer Research InstituteUniversity of Notre DameSouth BendUSA
  2. 2.Department of Aerospace and Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Notre DameSouth BendUSA
  3. 3.Department of Chemical and Biomolecular EngineeringUniversity of Notre DameSouth BendUSA

Personalised recommendations