Abstract
The determination of a protease’s cleavage site specificity is one of the major goals in degradomics. In the last years, the use of proteome-derived peptide libraries and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) in a proteomic identification of protease cleavage sites (PICS) experiment became popular for that purpose.
In this chapter, we offer a step-by-step protocol for the execution of a quantitative proteomic identification of protease cleavage sites (Q-PICS) experiment, which enables the relative quantification of proteolytic events by isobaric labeling, e.g., with tandem mass tags (TMT). In this way, the cleavage site specificity and activity of a protease can be compared under different reaction conditions (e.g., buffer, pH, temperature, inhibitor). Multiplexing can further be used to analyze replicate experiments in parallel, decreasing instrument times and work effort significantly, or to perform internal controls.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Lopez-Otin C, Overall CM (2002) Protease degradomics: a new challenge for proteomics. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3:509–519
Schilling O, Overall CM (2008) Proteome-derived, database-searchable peptide libraries for identifying protease cleavage sites . Nat Biotechnol 26:685–694
Jakoby T, van den Berg BH, Tholey A (2012) Quantitative protease cleavage site profiling using tandem-mass-tag labeling and LC-MALDI-TOF/TOF MS/MS analysis. J Proteome Res 11:1812–1820
Tucher J, Linke D, Koudelka T, Cassidy L, Tredup C, Wichert R, Pietrzik C, Becker-Pauly C, Tholey A (2014) LC-MS based cleavage site profiling of the proteases ADAM10 and ADAM17 using proteome-derived peptide libraries. J Proteome Res 13:2205–2214
Colaert N, Helsens K, Martens L, Vandekerckhove J, Gevaert K (2009) Improved visualization of protein consensus sequences by iceLogo. Nat Methods 6:786–787
Rawlings ND, Barrett AJ, Finn R (2016) Twenty years of the MEROPS database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D343–D350
Schilling O, Huesgen PF, Barre O, Auf dem Keller U, Overall CM (2011) Characterization of the prime and non-prime active site specificities of proteases by proteome-derived peptide libraries and tandem mass spectrometry. Nat Protoc 6:111–120
Stark GR, Stein WH, Moore S (1960) Reactions of the cyanate present in aqueous urea with amino acids and proteins. J Biol Chem 235:3177–3181
Maddelein D, Colaert N, Buchanan I, Hulstaert N, Gevaert K, Martens L (2015) The iceLogo web server and SOAP service for determining protein consensus sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 43:W543–W546
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by the SFB877 “Proteolysis as a Regulatory Event in Pathophysiology” (project Z2) and the Cluster of Excellence “Inflammation at Interfaces” funded by the DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Tucher, J., Tholey, A. (2017). Multiplexed Protease Specificity Profiling Using Isobaric Labeling. In: Schilling, O. (eds) Protein Terminal Profiling. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1574. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6850-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6850-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-6849-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-6850-3
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols