Skip to main content

In Vivo Diagnostic Procedures for IgE-Mediated Allergic Disorders

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Histamine Receptors as Drug Targets

Abstract

IgE-mediated allergic diseases include atopic diseases, such as eczema or respiratory allergies that are characterized by chronic allergic inflammation, as well as anaphylaxis stemming from clinically important sensitizations to foods, drugs, or venoms, to name the most important categories. It has long been acknowledged that the release of histamine by basophils and mast cells is a hallmark of IgE-mediated diseases. Recent insights into the immunomodulatory role of histamine and its four receptor types and specific aspects of the allergic inflammation have contributed to an increased interest about the mechanisms underlying their interplay. This interest is further fueled by the sharp rise in the prevalence of IgE-mediated diseases in westernized societies during the last decades and the resulting significant increase of the associated socioeconomic burden. In vivo diagnostic procedures, including skin testing and provocation tests, have proved to be valuable, yet simple tools for the investigation of allergic diseases both by clinicians and researchers as well as for influencing management decisions. Skin testing for IgE-mediated diseases is extensively used as a surrogate approach for the detection of allergen-specific IgE antibodies, currently being the diagnostic cornerstone for many allergic responses. Furthermore, provocation tests have evolved into an important approach for the diagnostic confirmation or the elucidation of the clinical relevance of suspected allergens, often being the golden standard for allergy diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Okada H, Kuhn C, Feillet H et al (2010) The “hygiene hypothesis” for autoimmune and allergic diseases: an update. Clin Exp Immunol 160:1–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Holgate ST, Wenzel S, Postma DS et al (2015) Asthma. Nat Rev Dis Primers 1:15025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Iweala OI, Burks AW (2016) Food allergy: our evolving understanding of its pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 16:37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghably J, Saleh H, Vyas H et al (2015) Paul Ehrlich’s mastzellen: a historical perspective of relevant developments in mast cell biology. Methods Mol Biol 1220:3–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kakavas S, Zampeli E, Papamichael K et al (2006) The mast cell pathway to inflammation and homeostasis: pharmacological insights. Anti-Inflamm Anti-Allergy Agents Med Chem (5):323–334

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chliva C, Aggelides X, Makris M et al (2015) Comparable profiles of serum histamine and IgG4 levels in allergic beekeepers. Allergy 70:457–460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zampeli E, Tiligada E (2009) The role of histamine H4 receptor in immune and inflammatory disorders. Br J Pharmacol 157:24–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Eder W, Ege MJ, von Mutius E (2006) The asthma epidemic. N Engl J Med 355:2226–2235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chiriac AM, Bousquet J, Demoly P (2014) In vivo methods for the study and diagnosis of allergy. In: Middleton’s allergy, 8th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  10. Treudler R, Simon JC (2013) Overview of component resolved diagnostics. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 13:110–117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mikhail GR, Miller-Milinska A (1964) Mast cell population in human skin. J Invest Dermatol 43:249–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sibilano R, Frossi B, Pucillo CE (2014) Mast cell activation: a complex interplay of positive and negative signaling pathways. Eur J Immunol 44:2558–2566

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Reshef A, Kagey-Sobotka A, Adkinson N Jr et al (1989) The pattern and kinetics in human skin of erythema and mediators during the acute and late-phase response (LPR). J Allergy Clin Immunol 84:678–687

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Demoly P, Bousquet J, Romano A (2014) In vivo methods for the study of allergy. In: Adkin-son Jr NF, Bochner BS, Busse WW, Holgate ST, Lemanske Jr RF, FER S (eds) Middleton’s allergy, principles and practice, 8th edn. Philadelphia, Mosby Elsevier Inc

    Google Scholar 

  15. Leguy-Seguin V, Jolimoy G, Coudert B et al (2007) Diagnostic and predictive value of skin testing in platinum salt hypersensitivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol 119:726–730

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Crobach MJ, Hermans J, Kaptein AA et al (1998) The diagnosis of allergic rhinitis: how to combine the medical history with the results of radioallergosorbent tests and skin prick tests. Scand J Prim Health Care 16:30–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cabañes N, Igea JM, de la Hoz B (2012) Latex allergy: position paper. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 22:313–330

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Greenhawt M, Aceves SS, Spergel JM et al (2013) The management of eosinophilic esophagitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 1:332–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Agarwal R, Aggarwal AN, Gupta D et al (2009) Aspergillus hypersensitivity and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in patients with bronchial asthma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 13:936–944

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Keil T, Kulig M, Simpson A et al (2006) European birth cohort studies on asthma and atopic diseases: II. Comparison of outcomes and exposures- a GA2LEN initiative. Allergy 61:1104–1111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rhodius R, Wickens K, Cheng S et al (2002) A comparison of two skin test methodologies and allergens from two different manufacturers. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 88:374–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Focke M, Marth K, Flicker S et al (2008) Heterogeneity of commercial timothy grass pollen extracts. Clin Exp Allergy 38:1400–1408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Blunk JA, Schmelz M, Zeck S et al (2004) Opioid-induced mast cell activation and vascular responses is not mediated by mu-opioid receptors: an in vivo microdialysis study in human skin. Anesth Analg 98:364–370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bousquet J, Heinzerling L, Bachert C et al (2012) Practical guide to skin prick tests in allergy to aeroallergens. Allergy 67:18–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bernstein IL, Li JT, Bernstein DI et al (2008) Allergy diagnostic testing: an updated practice parameter. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 100(Suppl 3):S1–148

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rachmiel M, Verleger H, Waisel Y et al (1996) The importance of the pecan tree pollen in allergic manifestations. Clin Exp Allergy 26:323–329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fernandes-Calda E, Puerta L, Mercado D et al (1993) Mite fauna Der p I, Der f I and Blomia tropicalis allergen levels in a tropical environment. Clin Exp Allergy 23:292–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yamada T, Saito H, Fujieda S (2014) Present state of Japanese cedar pollinosis: the national affliction. J Allergy Clin Immunol 133:632–9.e5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Henzgen M, Ballmer-Weber BK, Erdmann S et al (2008) Skin testing with food allergens. Guideline of the German Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), the Physicians’ Association of German Allergologists (ADA) and the Society of Pediatric Allergology (GPA) together with the Swiss Society of Allergology. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 6:983–988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Asero R, Monsalve R, Barber D (2008) Profilin sensitization detected in the office by skin prick test: a study of prevalence and clinical relevance of profilin as a plant food allergen. Clin Exp Allergy 38:1033–1037

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Webber CM, England RW (2010) Oral allergy syndrome: a clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic challenge. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 104:101–108 quiz 109–10, 117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Blanca M, Romano A, Torres MJ et al (2009) Update on the evaluation of hypersensitivity reactions to betalactams. Allergy 64:183–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Benucci M, Manfredi M, Demoly P et al (2008) Injection site reactions to TNF-alpha blocking agents with positive skin tests. Allergy 63:138–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Brockow K, Garvey LH, Aberer W et al (2013) Skin test concentrations for systemically administered drugs—an ENDA/EAACI Drug Allergy Interest Group position paper. Allergy 68:702–712

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Norrman G, Fälth-Magnusson K (2009) Adverse reactions to skin prick testing in children - prevalence and possible risk factors. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 20:273–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Liccardi G, D’Amato G, Walter Canonica G et al (2006) Systemic reactions from skin testing: literature review. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 16:75–78

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ruëff F, Bergmann KC, Brockow K et al (2011) Skin tests for diagnostics of allergic immediate-type reactions. Guideline of the German Society for allergology and clinical immunology. Pneumologie 65:484–495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lockey RF, Benedict LM, Turkeltaub PC et al (1987) Fatalities from immunotherapy (IT) and skin testing (ST). J Allergy Clin Immunol 79:660–677

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Heinzerling L, Mari A, Bergmann KC et al (2013) The skin prick test—European standards. Clin Transl Allergy 3:3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Devenney I, Falth-Magnusson K (2000) Skin prick tests may give generalized allergic reactions in infants. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 85:457–460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rueff F, Przybilla B, Bilo MBet al (2009) Predictors of severe systemic anaphylactic reactions in patients with Hymenoptera venom allergy: importance of baseline serum tryptase-a study of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology Interest Group on Insect Venom Hypersensitivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol 124:1047–1054

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nelson HS, Knoezner J, Bucher B (1997) Effect of distance between sites and region of the body on results of skin prick tests. J Allergy Clin Immunol 97:596–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Carr WW, Martin B, Howard RS et al (2005) Comparison of test devices for skin prick testing. J Allergy Clin Immunol 116:341–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Masse MS, Granger Vallée A, Chiriac A et al (2011) Comparison of five techniques of skin prick tests used routinely in Europe. Allergy 66:1415–1419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kupczyk M, Kuprys I, Gorski P et al (2001) Not one lancet for multiple SPT. Allergy 56:256–257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Konstantinou GN, Bousquet PJ, Zuberbier T et al (2010) The longest wheal diameter is the optimal measurement for the evaluation of skin prick tests. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 151:343–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Barbee RA, Brown WGH, Kaltenborn W et al (1981) Allergen skin test reactivity in a community population sample: correlation with age, histamine skin reactions and total serum immunoglobulin E. J Allergy Clin Immunol 68:15–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Goldberg A, Confino-Cohen R (1997) Timing of venom skin tests and IgE determinations after insect sting anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 100:183–184

    Google Scholar 

  49. Vocks E, Stander K, Rakoski J et al (1999) Suppression of immediate-type hypersensitivity elicitation in the skin prick test by ultraviolet B irradiation. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 15:236–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Skoner DP, Gentile DA, Angelini B et al (2006) Allergy skin test responses during experimental infection with respiratory syncytial virus. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 96:834–839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Strohmeier B, Aberer W, Bokanovic D et al (2013) Simultaneous intradermal testing with hymenoptera venoms is safe and more efficient than sequential testing. Allergy 68:542–544

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Schwindt CD, Hutcheson PS, Leu S-Y et al (2005) Role of intradermal skin tests in the evaluation of clinically relevant respiratory allergy assessed using patient history and nasal challenges. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 94:627–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Romano A, Guéant-Rodriguez RM, Viola M et al (2005) Diagnosing immediate reactions to cephalosporins. Clin Exp Allergy 35:1234–1242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Agache I, Bilò M, Braunstahl GJ et al (2015) In vivo diagnosis of allergic diseases—allergen provocation tests. Allergy 70:355–365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rondón C, Fernández J, López S et al (2009) Nasal inflammatory mediators and specific IgE production after nasal challenge with grass pollen in local allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 124:1005–1011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Demoly P, Adkinson NF, Brockow K et al (2014) International consensus on drug allergy. Allergy 69:420–437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Bousquet J, Schünemann HJ, Samolinski B et al (2012) Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma (ARIA): achievements in 10 years and futureneeds. J Allergy Clin Immunol 130:1049–1062

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Licari A, Marseglia A, Caimmi S et al (2015) Emerging and future therapies for allergic rhinitis. J Biol RegulHomeost Agents 29(S1):38–46

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Settipane RA, Schwindt C (2013) Chapter 15: allergic rhinitis. Am J Rhinol Allergy 27(S1):S52–S55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Hilberg O, Grymer LF, Pedersen OF (1995) Nasal histamine challenge in nonallergic and allergic subjects evaluated by acoustic rhinometry. Allergy 50:166–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Baroody FM, Shenaq D, DeTineo M et al (2009) Fluticasone furoate nasal spray reduces the nasal-ocular reflex: a mechanism for the efficacy of topical steroids in controlling allergic eye symptoms. J Allergy Clin Immunol 123:1342–1348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Baroody FM, Mucha SM, Detineo M et al (2008) Nasal challenge with allergen leads to maxillary sinus inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol 121:1126–1132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Boot JD, de Kam ML, Mascelli MA et al (2007) Nasal nitric oxide: longitudinal reproducibility and the effects of a nasal allergen challenge in patients with allergic rhinitis. Allergy 62:378–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Erin EM, Zacharasiewicz AS, Nicholson GC et al (2005) Topical corticosteroid inhibits interleukin-4, -5 and -13 in nasal secretions following allergen challenge. Clin Exp Allergy 35:1608–1614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Blackley C (1873) Experimental researches on the causes and nature of catarrhus aestivus, Balliere Tindal & Cox, London

    Google Scholar 

  66. Naclerio RM, Baroody FM (1992) Response of nasal mucosa to histamine or methacholine challenge: use of a quantitative method to examine the modulatory effects of atropine and ipratropium bromide. J Allergy Clin Immunol 90:1051–1504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Airaksinen L, Tuomi T, Vanhanen M et al (2007) Use of nasal provocation test in the diagnostics of occupational rhinitis. Rhinology 45:40–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Wachs M, Proud D, Lichtenstein LM et al (1989) Observations on the pathogenesis of nasal priming. J Allergy Clin Immunol 84:492–501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Dordal MT, Lluch-Bernal M, Sánchez MC et al (2011) Allergen-specific nasal provocation testing: review by the Rhinoconjunctivitis Committee of the Spanish Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 21:1–12

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Ciprandi G, Mora F, Cassano M et al (2009) Visual analog scale (VAS) and nasal obstruction in persistent allergic rhinitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 141:527–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Clement PA, Gordts F (2005) Consensus report on acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry. Rhinology 43:169–179

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Djupesland PG (2013) Nasal drug delivery devices: characteristics and performance ina clinical perspective-a review. Drug Deliv Transl Res 3:42–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Riechelmann H, Bachert C, Goldschmidt O et al (2003) Application of the nasal provocation test on diseases of the upper airways. Position Paper of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (ENT Section) in cooperation with the Working Team for Clinical Immunology. Laryngorhinootologie 82:183–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Sicherer C, Sampson HA (2010) Food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 125(S2):S116–S125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Keller M, Shuker M, Heimall J et al (2012) Severe malnutrition resulting from use of rice milk in food elimination diets for atopic dermatitis. IMAJ 14:40–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Boyce J, Assa’ad A, Burks AW et al (2010) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of food allergy in the United States: Report of the NIAID-Sponsored Expert Panel. J Allergy Clin Immunol 126:S1–S58

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Sackeyfio A, Senthinathan A, Kandaswamy P et al (2011) Diagnosis and assessment of food allergy in children and young people: Summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 23:342

    Google Scholar 

  78. Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Assa’ad AH, Bahna SL et al (2009) Work Group report: oral food challenge testing. J Allergy Clin Immunol 123:S365–S383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Bindslev-Jensen C, Ballmer-Weber BK, Bengtsson U et al (2004) Standardization of food challenges in patients with immediate reactions to foods–position paper from the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. Allergy 59:690–697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Sampson HA, Gerth van Wijk R, BindslevJensen C et al (2012) Standardizing double-blind, placebo controlled oral food challenges: American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology-European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology PRACTALL consensus report. J Allergy Clin Immunol 130:1260–1274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Ito K (2013) Diagnosis of food allergies: the impact of oral food challenge testing. Asia Pac Allergy 3:59–69

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Perry TT, Matsui EC, Conover-Walker MK et al (2004) Risk of oral food challenges. J Allergy Clin Immunol 114:1164–1168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Vickery BP, Burks AW (2009) Immunotherapy in the treatment of food allergy: focus onoral tolerance. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 9:364–370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Sampson HA, Munoz-Furlong A, Campbell RL et al (2006) Second symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: summary report—second National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network symposium. Ann Emerg Med 47:373–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Licari A, De Amici M, Nigrisoli S et al (2015) Tryptase and histamine may support oral food challenge in the diagnosis of allergy. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 29:1–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Bircher AJ, Scherer Hofmeier K (2012) Drug hypersensitivity reactions: Inconsistency in the use of the classification of immediate and nonimmediate reactions. J Allergy Clin Immunol 129:263–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Park BK, Naisbitt DJ, Demoly P (2012) Drug hypersensitivity. In: Holgate S, Church M, Broide D, Martinez F (eds) Allergy. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  88. Demoly P, Kropf R, Bircher A et al (1999) Drug hypersensitivity: questionnaire. EAACI interest group on drug hypersensitivity. Allergy 54:999–1003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Demoly P, Pichler W, Pirmohamed M et al (2008) Important questions in allergy: 1–drug allergy/hypersensitivity. Allergy 63:616–619

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters; American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology; American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology; Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (2010) Drug allergy: an updated practice parameter. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 105:259–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Mirakian R, Ewan PW, Durham SR et al (2009) BSACI guidelines for the management of drug allergy. Clin Exp Allergy 39:43–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Aberer W, Bircher A, Romano A et al (2003) Drug provocation testing in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions: general considerations. Allergy 58:854–863

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Tanno LK, Calderon MA, Demoly P (2016) Optimization and simplification of the allergic and hypersensitivity conditions classification for the ICD-11. Allergy 71:671–676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Simons FE, Ardusso LR, Bilò MB et al (2011) World allergy organization guidelines for the assessment and management of anaphylaxis. World Allergy Organ J 4:13–37

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Simons FE, Ebisawa M, Sanchez-Borges M et al (2015) 2015 update of the evidence base: World Allergy Organization anaphylaxis guidelines. World Allergy Organ J 8:32

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Koulias .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Koulias, C., Aggelides, X., Chliva, C., Makris, M. (2017). In Vivo Diagnostic Procedures for IgE-Mediated Allergic Disorders. In: Tiligada, E., Ennis, M. (eds) Histamine Receptors as Drug Targets. Methods in Pharmacology and Toxicology. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6843-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6843-5_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-6841-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-6843-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics