Microfluidic-Based Bacteria Isolation from Whole Blood for Diagnostics of Blood Stream Infection
Bacterial blood stream infection (BSI) potentially leads to life-threatening clinical conditions and medical emergencies such as severe sepsis, septic shock, and multi organ failure syndrome. Blood culturing is currently the gold standard for the identification of microorganisms and, although it has been automated over the decade, the process still requires 24–72 h to complete. This long turnaround time, especially for the identification of antimicrobial resistance, is driving the development of rapid molecular diagnostic methods. Rapid detection of microbial pathogens in blood related to bloodstream infections will allow the clinician to decide on or adjust the antimicrobial therapy potentially reducing the morbidity, mortality, and economic burden associated with BSI. For molecular-based methods, there is a lot to gain from an improved and straightforward method for isolation of bacteria from whole blood for downstream processing.
We describe a microfluidic-based sample-preparation approach that rapidly and selectively lyses all blood cells while it extracts intact bacteria for downstream analysis. Whole blood is exposed to a mild detergent, which lyses most blood cells, and then to osmotic shock using deionized water, which eliminates the remaining white blood cells. The recovered bacteria are 100 % viable, which opens up possibilities for performing drug susceptibility tests and for nucleic-acid-based molecular identification.
Key wordsSepsis Blood stream infection Microfluidics Diagnostic Pathogens Bacteremia Point-of-care diagnostics
This work was supported by the European Commission (projects FP7 InTopSens and IMI RAPP-ID)
- 4.Turenne CY, Witwicki E, Hoban DJ, Karlowsky JA, Kabani AM (2000) Rapid identification of bacteria from positive blood cultures by fluorescence-based PCR-single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis of the 16S rRNA gene. J Clin Microbiol 38(2):513–520Google Scholar
- 5.Wellinghausen N, Wirths B, Essig A, Wassill L (2004) Evaluation of the hyplex bloodscreen multiplex PCR-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay system for direct identification of gram-positive cocci and gram-negative bacilli from positive blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 42(7):3147–3152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Tang Y-W, Kilic A, Yang Q, McAllister SK, Li H, Miller RS et al (2007) StaphPlex system for rapid and simultaneous identification of antibiotic resistance determinants and Panton-Valentine leukocidin detection of staphylococci from positive blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 45(6):1867–1873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Weller SA, Cox V, Essex-Lopresti A, Hartley MG, Parsons TM, Rachwal PA et al (2012) Evaluation of two multiplex real-time PCR screening capabilities for the detection of Bacillus anthracis, Francisella tularensis and Yersinia pestis in blood samples generated from murine infection models. J Med Microbiol 61(Pt 11):1546–1555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Kellogg JA, Manzella JP, Bankert DA (2000) Frequency of low-level bacteremia in children from birth to fifteen years of age. J Clin Microbiol 38(6):2181–2185Google Scholar
- 13.Henry NK, McLimans CA, Wright AJ, Thompson RL, Wilson WR, Washington JA (1983) Microbiological and clinical evaluation of the isolator lysis-centrifugation blood culture tube. J Clin Microbiol 17(5):864–869Google Scholar