Abstract
The protein sequences of class I HDACs in mice and humans are 96–99 % identical. These highly conserved proteins have crucial roles in biological processes, such as proliferation and development, which is reflected in the lethality that occurs in conventional whole body knockout mice. Therefore, conditional knockouts are inevitable to investigate the functions of class I HDACs in mice. Here, we describe the generation of conditional class I Hdac knockout mice, using Hdac1 as an example. We explain a relatively quick procedure to generate the necessary target vectors by recombination-mediated genetic engineering and gateway techniques. Furthermore, we show how to culture, target, and screen for positively recombined ES cells. Additionally, we present a dual recombination system, which allows the deletion of class I Hdacs at any time by a tamoxifen inducible Cre.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Sternberg N, Hamilton D (1981) Bacteriophage P1 site-specific recombination. I. Recombination between loxP sites. J Mol Biol 150:467–486
Mansour SL, Thomas KR, Capecchi MR (1988) Disruption of the proto-oncogene int-2 in mouse embryo-derived stem cells: a general strategy for targeting mutations to non-selectable genes. Nature 336:348–352
Montgomery RL et al (2007) Histone deacetylases 1 and 2 redundantly regulate cardiac morphogenesis, growth, and contractility. Genes Dev 21:1790–1802
Lagger G et al (2002) Essential function of histone deacetylase 1 in proliferation control and CDK inhibitor repression. EMBO J 21:2672–2681
Montgomery RL et al (2008) Maintenance of cardiac energy metabolism by histone deacetylase 3 in mice. J Clin Invest 118:3588–3597
Bhaskara S et al (2008) Deletion of histone deacetylase 3 reveals critical roles in S phase progression and DNA damage control. Mol Cell 30:61–72
Trivedi CM et al (2007) Hdac2 regulates the cardiac hypertrophic response by modulating Gsk3 beta activity. Nat Med 13:324–331
Haberland M, Mokalled MH, Montgomery RL, Olson EN (2009) Epigenetic control of skull morphogenesis by histone deacetylase 8. Genes Dev 23:1625–1630
Orban PC, Chui D, Marth JD (1992) Tissue- and site-specific DNA recombination in transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:6861–6865
Sauer B (1987) Functional expression of the cre-lox site-specific recombination system in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 7:2087–2096
Yau YY, Stewart CN Jr (2013) Less is more: strategies to remove marker genes from transgenic plants. BMC Biotechnol 13:36
Tian Y, James S, Zuo J, Fritzsch B, Beisel KW (2006) Conditional and inducible gene recombineering in the mouse inner ear. Brain Res 1091:243–254
Schlake T, Bode J (1994) Use of mutated FLP recognition target (FRT) sites for the exchange of expression cassettes at defined chromosomal loci. Biochemistry 33:12746–12751
Schonhuber N et al (2014) A next-generation dual-recombinase system for time- and host-specific targeting of pancreatic cancer. Nat Med 20:1340–1347
Diersch S et al (2015) Kras(G12D) induces EGFR-MYC cross signaling in murine primary pancreatic ductal epithelial cells. Oncogene 35:3880–6.
Feil R et al (1996) Ligand-activated site-specific recombination in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:10887–10890
Kersey PJ et al (2016) Ensembl Genomes 2016: more genomes, more complexity. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D574–80
Yates A et al (2016) Ensembl 2016. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 44:D710–6
Datsenko KA, Wanner BL (2000) One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:6640–6645
Chaiyachati BH et al (2013) LoxP-FRT Trap (LOFT): a simple and flexible system for conventional and reversible gene targeting. BMC Biol 10:96
Chung CT, Niemela SL, Miller RH (1989) One-step preparation of competent Escherichia coli: transformation and storage of bacterial cells in the same solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86:2172–2175
Kobayashi N et al (2005) Gene delivery to embryonic stem cells. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 75:10–18
Neumann E, Schaefer-Ridder M, Wang Y, Hofschneider PH (1982) Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields. EMBO J 1:841–845
Lee KH (2014) Generating chimeric mice from embryonic stem cells via vial coculturing or hypertonic microinjection. Methods Mol Biol 1194:77–111
Wirth M et al (2014) MYC and EGR1 synergize to trigger tumor cell death by controlling NOXA and BIM transcription upon treatment with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. Nucleic Acids Res 42:10433–10447
Huijbers IJ et al (2015) Using the GEMM-ESC strategy to study gene function in mouse models. Nat Protoc 10:1755–1785
Huijbers IJ et al (2014) Rapid target gene validation in complex cancer mouse models using re-derived embryonic stem cells. EMBO Mol Med 6:212–225
Premsrirut PK et al (2011) A rapid and scalable system for studying gene function in mice using conditional RNA interference. Cell 145:145–158
Saborowski M et al (2014) A modular and flexible ESC-based mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Genes Dev 28:85–97
Loonstra A et al (2001) Growth inhibition and DNA damage induced by Cre recombinase in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:9209–9214
Pfeifer A, Brandon EP, Kootstra N, Gage FH, Verma IM (2001) Delivery of the Cre recombinase by a self-deleting lentiviral vector: efficient gene targeting in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:11450–11455
Hameyer D et al (2007) Toxicity of ligand-dependent Cre recombinases and generation of a conditional Cre deleter mouse allowing mosaic recombination in peripheral tissues. Physiol Genomics 31:32–41
Buchholz F, Ringrose L, Angrand PO, Rossi F, Stewart AF (1996) Different thermostabilities of FLP and Cre recombinases: implications for applied site-specific recombination. Nucleic Acids Res 24:4256–4262
Sauer B, McDermott J (2004) DNA recombination with a heterospecific Cre homolog identified from comparison of the pac-c1 regions of P1-related phages. Nucleic Acids Res 32:6086–6095
Anastassiadis K et al (2009) Dre recombinase, like Cre, is a highly efficient site-specific recombinase in E. coli, mammalian cells and mice. Dis Model Mech 2:508–515
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by Else Kröner Fresenius Stiftung (2016_A43) to MW.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Bayer, S., Wirth, M. (2017). Engineering of Conditional Class I Hdac Knockout Mice and Generation of a Time-Spatial Knockout by a Dual Recombination System. In: Krämer, O. (eds) HDAC/HAT Function Assessment and Inhibitor Development. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1510. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6527-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6527-4_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-6525-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-6527-4
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols