Skip to main content

In Vivo Assessment of Muscle Contractility in Animal Studies

  • Protocol
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1460))

Abstract

In patients with muscle injury or muscle disease, assessment of muscle damage is typically limited to clinical signs, such as tenderness, strength, range of motion, and more recently, imaging studies. Animal models provide unmitigated access to histological samples, which provide a “direct measure” of damage. However, even with unconstrained access to tissue morphology and biochemistry assays, the findings typically do not account for loss of muscle function. Thus, the most comprehensive measure of the overall health of the muscle is assessment of its primary function, which is to produce contractile force. The majority of animal models testing contractile force have been limited to the muscle groups moving the ankle, with advantages and disadvantages depending on the equipment. Here, we describe in vivo methods to measure torque, to produce a reliable muscle injury, and to follow muscle function within the same animal over time. We also describe in vivo methods to measure tension in the leg and thigh muscles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Protocol
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

References

  1. Call JA, Eckhoff MD, Baltgalvis KA, Warren GL, Lowe DA (2011) Adaptive strength gains in dystrophic muscle exposed to repeated bouts of eccentric contraction. J Appl Physiol 111:1768–1777

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Lovering RM, De Deyne PG (2004) Contractile function, sarcolemma integrity, and the loss of dystrophin after skeletal muscle eccentric contraction-induced injury. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 286:C230–C238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ingalls CP, Warren GL, Zhang JZ, Hamilton SL, Armstrong RB (2004) Dihydropyridine and ryanodine receptor binding after eccentric contractions in mouse skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 96:1619–1625

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rathbone CR, Wenke JC, Warren GL, Armstrong RB (2003) Importance of satellite cells in the strength recovery after eccentric contraction-induced muscle injury. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 285:R1490–R1495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lieber RL, Shah S, Friden J (2002) Cytoskeletal disruption after eccentric contraction-induced muscle injury. Clin Orthop (403 Suppl):S90–S99

    Google Scholar 

  6. Warren GL, Hermann KM, Ingalls CP, Masselli MR, Armstrong RB (2000) Decreased EMG median frequency during a second bout of eccentric contractions. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:820–829

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ingalls CP, Warren GL, Williams JH, Ward CW, Armstrong RB (1998) E-C coupling failure in mouse EDL muscle after in vivo eccentric contractions. J Appl Physiol 85:58–67

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lieber RL, Thornell LE, Friden J (1996) Muscle cytoskeletal disruption occurs within the first 15 min of cyclic eccentric contraction. J Appl Physiol 80:278–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Faulkner JA, Jones DA, Round JM (1989) Injury to skeletal muscles of mice by forced lengthening during contractions. Q J Exp Physiol 74:661–670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Friden J, Lieber RL (2001) Serum creatine kinase level is a poor predictor of muscle function after injury. Scand J Med Sci Sports 11:126–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Matarese G, La CA, Horvath TL (2012) In vivo veritas, in vitro artificia. Trends Mol Med 18:439–442

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Best TM, McCabe RP, Corr D, Vanderby R Jr (1998) Evaluation of a new method to create a standardized muscle stretch injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30:200–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barash IA, Mathew L, Ryan AF, Chen J, Lieber RL (2004) Rapid muscle-specific gene expression changes after a single bout of eccentric contractions in the mouse. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 286:C355–C364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brooks SV, Opiteck JA, Faulkner JA (2001) Conditioning of skeletal muscles in adult and old mice for protection from contraction-induced injury. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56:B163–B171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Koh TJ, Brooks SV (2001) Lengthening contractions are not required to induce protection from contraction-induced muscle injury. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 281:R155–R161

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Heemskerk AM, Strijkers GJ, Vilanova A, Drost MR, Nicolay K (2005) Determination of mouse skeletal muscle architecture using three-dimensional diffusion tensor imaging. Magn Reson Med 53:1333–1340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lieber RL, Friden J (1988) Selective damage of fast glycolytic muscle fibres with eccentric contraction of the rabbit tibialis anterior. Acta Physiol Scand 133:587–588

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Warren GL, Lowe DA, Hayes DA, Karwoski CJ, Prior BM, Armstrong RB (1993) Excitation failure in eccentric contraction-induced injury of mouse soleus muscle. J Physiol 468:487–499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lovering RM, Hakim M, Moorman CT III, De Deyne PG (2005) The contribution of contractile pre-activation to loss of function after a single lengthening contraction. J Biomech 38:1501–1507

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Dipasquale DM, Bloch RJ, Lovering RM (2011) Determinants of the repeated-bout effect after lengthening contractions. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 90:816–824

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Call JA, Lowe DA (2016) Eccentric contraction-induced muscle injury: reproducible, quantitative, physiological models to impair skeletal muscle's capacity to generate force

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hakim M, Hage W, Lovering RM, Moorman CT III, Curl LA, De Deyne PG (2005) Dexamethasone and recovery of contractile tension after a muscle injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res 439:235–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lovering RM, Roche JA, Bloch RJ, De Deyne PG (2007) Recovery of function in skeletal muscle following 2 different contraction-induced injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88:617–625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lovering RM, McMillan AB, Gullapalli RP (2009) Location of myofiber damage in skeletal muscle after lengthening contractions. Muscle Nerve 40:589–594

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Pratt SJ, Lawlor MW, Shah SB, Lovering RM (2011) An in vivo rodent model of contraction-induced injury in the quadriceps muscle. Injury. 2012;43(6):788–793. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2011.09.015.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pratt SJ, Lovering RM (2014) A stepwise procedure to test contractility and susceptibility to injury for the rodent quadriceps muscle. J Biol Methods. doi:10.14440/jbm.2014.34

    Google Scholar 

  27. Huijing PA, Baan GC (2001) Myofascial force transmission causes interaction between adjacent muscles and connective tissue: effects of blunt dissection and compartmental fasciotomy on length force characteristics of rat extensor digitorum longus muscle. Arch Physiol Biochem 109:97–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health by grants to APV (T32AG000268-15S1), SRI (AR07592-20), and to RML (1R01AR059179).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard M. Lovering .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Iyer, S.R., Valencia, A.P., Hernández-Ochoa, E.O., Lovering, R.M. (2016). In Vivo Assessment of Muscle Contractility in Animal Studies. In: Kyba, M. (eds) Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1460. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3810-0_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3810-0_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3808-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3810-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics