Abstract
High-throughput sequencing technologies have made it possible for biologists to generate genome-wide profiles of chromatin features at the nucleotide resolution. Enzymes such as nucleases or transposes have been instrumental as a chromatin-probing agent due to their ability to target accessible chromatin for cleavage or insertion. On the scale of a few hundred base pairs, preferential action of the nuclear enzymes on accessible chromatin allows mapping of cell state-specific accessibility in vivo. Such accessible regions contain functionally important regulatory sites, including promoters and enhancers, which undergo active remodeling for cells adapting in a dynamic environment. DNase-seq and the more recent ATAC-seq are two assays that are gaining popularity. Deep sequencing of DNA libraries from these assays, termed genomic footprinting, has been proposed to enable the comprehensive construction of protein occupancy profiles over the genome at the nucleotide level. Recent studies have discovered limitations of genomic footprinting which reduce the scope of detectable proteins. In addition, the identification of putative factors that bind to the observed footprints remains challenging. Despite these caveats, the methodology still presents significant advantages over alternative techniques such as ChIP-seq or FAIRE-seq. Here we describe computational approaches and tools for analysis of chromatin accessibility and genomic footprinting. Proper experimental design and assay-specific data analysis ensure the detection sensitivity and maximize retrievable information. The enzyme-based chromatin profiling approaches represent a powerful and evolving methodology which facilitates our understanding of how the genome is regulated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Voss TC, Hager GL (2014) Dynamic regulation of transcriptional states by chromatin and transcription factors. Nat Rev Genet 15:69–81
Felsenfeld G, Groudine M (2003) Controlling the double helix. Nature 421:448–453
Hsiung CC, Morrissey CS, Udugama M, Frank CL, Keller CA, Baek S, Giardine B, Crawford GE, Sung MH, Hardison RC, Blobel GA (2015) Genome accessibility is widely preserved and locally modulated during mitosis. Genome Res 25:213–225
Morris SA, Baek S, Sung MH, John S, Wiench M, Johnson TA, Schiltz RL, Hager GL (2014) Overlapping chromatin-remodeling systems collaborate genome wide at dynamic chromatin transitions. Nat Struct Mol Biol 21:73–81
Thurman RE, Rynes E, Humbert R, Vierstra J, Maurano MT, Haugen E, Sheffield NC, Stergachis AB, Wang H, Vernot B, Garg K, John S, Sandstrom R, Bates D, Boatman L, Canfield TK, Diegel M, Dunn D, Ebersol AK, Frum T, Giste E, Johnson AK, Johnson EM, Kutyavin T, Lajoie B, Lee BK, Lee K, London D, Lotakis D, Neph S, Neri F, Nguyen ED, Qu H, Reynolds AP, Roach V, Safi A, Sanchez ME, Sanyal A, Shafer A, Simon JM, Song L, Vong S, Weaver M, Yan Y, Zhang Z, Zhang Z, Lenhard B, Tewari M, Dorschner MO, Hansen RS, Navas PA, Stamatoyannopoulos G, Iyer VR, Lieb JD, Sunyaev SR, Akey JM, Sabo PJ, Kaul R, Furey TS, Dekker J, Crawford GE, Stamatoyannopoulos JA (2012) The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome. Nature 489:75–82
Siersbaek R, Nielsen R, John S, Sung MH, Baek S, Loft A, Hager GL, Mandrup S (2011) Extensive chromatin remodelling and establishment of transcription factor ‘hotspots’ during early adipogenesis. EMBO J 30:1459–1472
John S, Sabo PJ, Thurman RE, Sung MH, Biddie SC, Johnson TA, Hager GL, Stamatoyannopoulos JA (2011) Chromatin accessibility pre-determines glucocorticoid receptor binding patterns. Nat Genet 43:264–268
John S, Sabo PJ, Canfield TK, Lee K, Vong S, Weaver M, Wang H, Vierstra J, Reynolds AP, Thurman RE, Stamatoyannopoulos JA (2013) Genome-scale mapping of DNase I hypersensitivity. Curr Protoc Mol Biol Chapter 27:Unit 21.27
Buenrostro JD, Giresi PG, Zaba LC, Chang HY, Greenleaf WJ (2013) Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat Methods 10:1213–1218
Boyle AP, Davis S, Shulha HP, Meltzer P, Margulies EH, Weng Z, Furey TS, Crawford GE (2008) High-resolution mapping and characterization of open chromatin across the genome. Cell 132:311–322
Song L, Zhang Z, Grasfeder LL, Boyle AP, Giresi PG, Lee BK, Sheffield NC, Graf S, Huss M, Keefe D, Liu Z, London D, McDaniell RM, Shibata Y, Showers KA, Simon JM, Vales T, Wang T, Winter D, Zhang Z, Clarke ND, Birney E, Iyer VR, Crawford GE, Lieb JD, Furey TS (2011) Open chromatin defined by DNaseI and FAIRE identifies regulatory elements that shape cell-type identity. Genome Res 21:1757–1767
Boyle AP, Song L, Lee BK, London D, Keefe D, Birney E, Iyer VR, Crawford GE, Furey TS (2011) High-resolution genome-wide in vivo footprinting of diverse transcription factors in human cells. Genome Res 21:456–464
Hesselberth JR, Chen X, Zhang Z, Sabo PJ, Sandstrom R, Reynolds AP, Thurman RE, Neph S, Kuehn MS, Noble WS, Fields S, Stamatoyannopoulos JA (2009) Global mapping of protein-DNA interactions in vivo by digital genomic footprinting. Nat Methods 6:283–289
Neph S, Vierstra J, Stergachis AB, Reynolds AP, Haugen E, Vernot B, Thurman RE, John S, Sandstrom R, Johnson AK, Maurano MT, Humbert R, Rynes E, Wang H, Vong S, Lee K, Bates D, Diegel M, Roach V, Dunn D, Neri J, Schafer A, Hansen RS, Kutyavin T, Giste E, Weaver M, Canfield T, Sabo P, Zhang M, Balasundaram G, Byron R, MacCoss MJ, Akey JM, Bender MA, Groudine M, Kaul R, Stamatoyannopoulos JA (2012) An expansive human regulatory lexicon encoded in transcription factor footprints. Nature 489:83–90
Pepke S, Wold B, Mortazavi A (2009) Computation for ChIP-seq and RNA-seq studies. Nat Methods 6:S22–S32
Baek S, Sung MH, Hager GL (2012) Quantitative analysis of genome-wide chromatin remodeling. Methods Mol Biol 833:433–441
Tsompana M, Buck MJ (2014) Chromatin accessibility: a window into the genome. Epigenetics Chromatin 7:33
Sung MH, Guertin MJ, Baek S, Hager GL (2014) DNase footprint signatures are dictated by factor dynamics and DNA sequence. Mol Cell 56:275–285
Koohy H, Down TA, Hubbard TJ (2013) Chromatin accessibility data sets show bias due to sequence specificity of the DNase I enzyme. PLoS One 8, e69853
Boyle AP, Guinney J, Crawford GE, Furey TS (2008) F-Seq: a feature density estimator for high-throughput sequence tags. Bioinformatics 24:2537–2538
Song L, Crawford GE (2010) DNase-seq: a high-resolution technique for mapping active gene regulatory elements across the genome from mammalian cells. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2010:pdb.prot5384
Grant CE, Bailey TL, Noble WS (2011) FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif. Bioinformatics 27:1017–1018
Bailey TL, Williams N, Misleh C, Li WW (2006) MEME: discovering and analyzing DNA and protein sequence motifs. Nucleic Acids Res 34:W369–W373
Bailey TL (2011) DREME: motif discovery in transcription factor ChIP-seq data. Bioinformatics 27:1653–1659
Heinz S, Benner C, Spann N, Bertolino E, Lin YC, Laslo P, Cheng JX, Murre C, Singh H, Glass CK (2010) Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol Cell 38:576–589
Gupta S, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Bailey TL, Noble WS (2007) Quantifying similarity between motifs. Genome Biol 8:R24
He HH, Meyer CA, Hu SS, Chen MW, Zang C, Liu Y, Rao PK, Fei T, Xu H, Long H, Liu XS, Brown M (2014) Refined DNase-seq protocol and data analysis reveals intrinsic bias in transcription factor footprint identification. Nat Methods 11:73–78
Lazarovici A, Zhou T, Shafer A, Dantas Machado AC, Riley TR, Sandstrom R, Sabo PJ, Lu Y, Rohs R, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Bussemaker HJ (2013) Probing DNA shape and methylation state on a genomic scale with DNase I. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:6376–6381
Neph S, Stergachis AB, Reynolds A, Sandstrom R, Borenstein E, Stamatoyannopoulos JA (2012) Circuitry and dynamics of human transcription factor regulatory networks. Cell 150:1274–1286
Stergachis AB, Neph S, Sandstrom R, Haugen E, Reynolds AP, Zhang M, Byron R, Canfield T, Stelhing-Sun S, Lee K, Thurman RE, Vong S, Bates D, Neri F, Diegel M, Giste E, Dunn D, Vierstra J, Hansen RS, Johnson AK, Sabo PJ, Wilken MS, Reh TA, Treuting PM, Kaul R, Groudine M, Bender MA, Borenstein E, Stamatoyannopoulos JA (2014) Conservation of trans-acting circuitry during mammalian regulatory evolution. Nature 515:365–370
Piper J, Elze MC, Cauchy P, Cockerill PN, Bonifer C, Ott S (2013) Wellington: a novel method for the accurate identification of digital genomic footprints from DNase-seq data. Nucleic Acids Res 41, e201
Pique-Regi R, Degner JF, Pai AA, Gaffney DJ, Gilad Y, Pritchard JK (2011) Accurate inference of transcription factor binding from DNA sequence and chromatin accessibility data. Genome Res 21:447–455
Vierstra J, Wang H, John S, Sandstrom R, Stamatoyannopoulos JA (2014) Coupling transcription factor occupancy to nucleosome architecture with DNase-FLASH. Nat Methods 11:66–72
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Baek, S., Sung, MH. (2016). Genome-Scale Analysis of Cell-Specific Regulatory Codes Using Nuclear Enzymes. In: Mathé, E., Davis, S. (eds) Statistical Genomics. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1418. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3578-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3578-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3576-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3578-9
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols