Abstract
Gating is the mechanism by which the influence of an environmental signal on a particular output is temporally restricted by the circadian clock, so that the maximum response of the output to the signal occurs at a specific time. Gated regulation mechanisms have been described for several genes whose expression is strongly induced by light or temperature at certain times but repressed by the circadian clock at others. To reveal a gated pattern of expression in response to light, light pulses are applied in the dark at different times of the 24 h cycle and the transcriptional response of the gene of interest is then monitored with an appropriate technique. Luciferase (LUC) reporters have been the method of choice to study circadian rhythms in the past decades, but this methodology also provides an ideal platform for performing a gating assay. In this chapter, we describe a LUC imaging based protocol designed to test whether the influence of light on the expression of a gene of interest is gated by the circadian clock.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
de Montaigu A, Toth R, Coupland G (2010) Plant development goes like clockwork. Trends Genet 26(7):296–306
Wang W, Barnaby JY, Tada Y, Li H, Tor M, Caldelari D, Lee DU, Fu XD, Dong X (2011) Timing of plant immune responses by a central circadian regulator. Nature 470(7332):110–114
Covington MF, Maloof JN, Straume M, Kay SA, Harmer SL (2008) Global transcriptome analysis reveals circadian regulation of key pathways in plant growth and development. Genome Biol 9(8):R130
Turner A, Beales J, Faure S, Dunford RP, Laurie DA (2005) The pseudo-response regulator Ppd-H1 provides adaptation to photoperiod in barley. Science 310(5750):1031–1034
Bohlenius H, Huang T, Charbonnel-Campaa L, Brunner AM, Jansson S, Strauss SH, Nilsson O (2006) CO/FT regulatory module controls timing of flowering and seasonal growth cessation in trees. Science 312(5776):1040–1043
Kloosterman B, Abelenda JA, Gomez Mdel M, Oortwijn M, de Boer JM, Kowitwanich K, Horvath BM, van Eck HJ, Smaczniak C, Prat S, Visser RG, Bachem CW (2013) Naturally occurring allele diversity allows potato cultivation in northern latitudes. Nature 495(7440):246–250
Millar AJ, Short SR, Chua NH, Kay SA (1992) A novel circadian phenotype based on firefly luciferase expression in transgenic plants. Plant Cell 4(9):1075–1087
Li G, Siddiqui H, Teng Y, Lin R, Wan XY, Li J, Lau OS, Ouyang X, Dai M, Wan J, Devlin PF, Deng XW, Wang H (2011) Coordinated transcriptional regulation underlying the circadian clock in Arabidopsis. Nat Cell Biol 13(5):616–622
Fowler SG, Cook D, Thomashow MF (2005) Low temperature induction of Arabidopsis CBF1, 2, and 3 is gated by the circadian clock. Plant Physiol 137(3):961–968
Edwards KD, Akman OE, Knox K, Lumsden PJ, Thomson AW, Brown PE, Pokhilko A, Kozma-Bognar L, Nagy F, Rand DA, Millar AJ (2010) Quantitative analysis of regulatory flexibility under changing environmental conditions. Mol Syst Biol 6:424
Vieira J, Pinto da Silva L, Esteves da Silva JC (2012) Advances in the knowledge of light emission by firefly luciferin and oxyluciferin. J Photochem Photobiol B 117:33–39
Close D, Xu T, Smartt A, Rogers A, Crossley R, Price S, Ripp S, Sayler G (2012) The evolution of the bacterial luciferase gene cassette (lux) as a real-time bioreporter. Sensors (Basel) 12(1):732–752
Millar AJ, Kay SA (1996) Integration of circadian and phototransduction pathways in the network controlling CAB gene transcription in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93(26):15491–15496
Strayer C, Oyama T, Schultz TF, Raman R, Somers DE, Mas P, Panda S, Kreps JA, Kay SA (2000) Cloning of the Arabidopsis clock gene TOC1, an autoregulatory response regulator homolog. Science 289(5480):768–771
Alabadi D, Oyama T, Yanovsky MJ, Harmon FG, Mas P, Kay SA (2001) Reciprocal regulation between TOC1 and LHY/CCA1 within the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Science 293(5531):880–883
Covington MF, Panda S, Liu XL, Strayer CA, Wagner DR, Kay SA (2001) ELF3 modulates resetting of the circadian clock in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 13(6):1305–1315
Clough SJ, Bent AF (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16(6):735–743
Haydon MJ, Mielczarek O, Robertson FC, Hubbard KE, Webb AA (2013) Photosynthetic entrainment of the Arabidopsis thaliana circadian clock. Nature 502(7473):689–692
Moore A, Zielinski T, Millar AJ (2014) Online period estimation and determination of rhythmicity in circadian data, using the BioDare data infrastructure. Methods Mol Biol 1158:13–44
Zielinski T, Moore AM, Troup E, Halliday KJ, Millar AJ (2014) Strengths and limitations of period estimation methods for circadian data. PLoS One 9(5):e96462
Acknowledgements
The laboratory of George Coupland receives a core grant from the Max Planck Society. We are grateful to Reka Tóth and Seth Davis for many discussions on luminescence measurements and experimental design.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
de Montaigu, A., Berns, M.C., Coupland, G. (2016). A Luciferase-Based Assay to Test Whether Gene Expression Responses to Environmental Inputs Are Temporally Restricted by the Circadian Clock. In: Duque, P. (eds) Environmental Responses in Plants. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1398. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3356-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3356-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3354-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3356-3
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols