Abstract
Toward a comprehensive characterization of toxicant responses, systems toxicology requires the integration of different data modalities. Proteomics approaches measure changes in the levels of proteins and their posttranslational modifications, which can closely reflect the biological effects of a toxicant. With a focus on mass spectrometry-based proteomics, we describe the isobaric tag-based approach for quantitative proteomics (iTRAQ® and TMT™) and describe computational approaches to derive biological/mechanistic insights. Specifically, we describe the generation and quantification of mass-spectrometry data and the identification of affected proteins, functional modules, and protein subnetworks. We illustrate these approaches using results from a 90-day rat inhalation toxicology study. Overall, we provide the foundation to employ quantitative proteomics within systems toxicology assessment strategies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Titz B, Elamin A, Martin F et al (2014) Proteomics for systems toxicology. CSBJ 11(18):73–90
Rowlands JC, Sander M, Bus JS (2014) FutureTox: building the road for 21st century toxicology and risk assessment practices. Toxicol Sci 137(2):269–277
National Research Council. Committee on Toxicity T (2007) Assessment of environmental A. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. National Academies Press, Pittsburgh, PA
Sturla SJ, Boobis AR, FitzGerald RE et al (2014) Systems toxicology: from basic research to risk assessment. Chem Res Toxicol 27(3):314–329. doi:10.1021/tx400410s
Vogel C, Marcotte EM (2012) Insights into the regulation of protein abundance from proteomic and transcriptomic analyses. Nat Rev Genet 13(4):227–232. doi:10.1038/nrg3185
Spriggs KA, Bushell M, Willis AE (2010) Translational regulation of gene expression during conditions of cell stress. Mol Cell 40(2):228–237
Hardie DG, Ross FA, Hawley SA (2012) AMPK: a nutrient and energy sensor that maintains energy homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13(4):251–262
Shiloh Y, Ziv Y (2013) The ATM protein kinase: regulating the cellular response to genotoxic stress, and more. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14(4):197–210
Runchel C, Matsuzawa A, Ichijo H (2011) Mitogen-activated protein kinases in mammalian oxidative stress responses. Antioxid Redox Signal 15(1):205–218
Merrick BA, Witzmann FA (2009) The role of toxicoproteomics in assessing organ specific toxicity. EXS 99:367–400
Mann M, Kelleher NL (2008) Precision proteomics: the case for high resolution and high mass accuracy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(47):18132–18138
Mallick P, Kuster B (2010) Proteomics: a pragmatic perspective. Nat Biotechnol 28(7):695–709, doi:nbt.1658 [pii] 10.1038/nbt.1658
Yates JR III, Mohammed S, Heck AJ (2014) Phosphoproteomics. Anal Chem 86(3):1313
Wiese S, Reidegeld KA, Meyer HE et al (2007) Protein labeling by iTRAQ: a new tool for quantitative mass spectrometry in proteome research. Proteomics 7(3):340–350
Zieske LR (2006) A perspective on the use of iTRAQ reagent technology for protein complex and profiling studies. J Exp Bot 57(7):1501–1508, doi:erj168 [pii] 10.1093/jxb/erj168
Kelstrup CD, Young C, Lavallee R et al (2012) Optimized fast and sensitive acquisition methods for shotgun proteomics on a quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometer. J Proteome Res 11(6):3487–3497
Sturm M, Bertsch A, Gröpl C et al (2008) OpenMS – an open-source software framework for mass spectrometry. BMC Bioinformatics 9(1):163
Röst HL, Schmitt U, Aebersold R et al (2014) pyOpenMS: a python‐based interface to the OpenMS mass‐spectrometry algorithm library. Proteomics 14(1):74–77
Berthold MR, Cebron N, Dill F et al (2008) KNIME: The Konstanz information miner. Springer, New York, NY
Team RC, Team RC (2005) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Nahnsen S, Bielow C, Reinert K et al (2013) Tools for label-free peptide quantification. Mol Cell Proteomics 12(3):549–556
Lemeer S, Hahne H, Pachl F et al (2012) Software tools for MS-based quantitative proteomics: a brief overview. Quantitative methods in proteomics. Springer, New York, NY, pp 489–499
Eng JK, McCormack AL, Yates JR (1994) An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 5(11):976–989, doi:10.1016/1044-0305(94)80016-2
Cottrell JS, London U (1999) Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 20(18):3551–3567
Craig R, Beavis RC (2004) TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 20(9):1466–1467
Geer LY, Markey SP, Kowalak JA et al (2004) Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. J Proteome Res 3(5):958–964
MacCoss MJ, Wu CC, Yates JR (2002) Probability-based validation of protein identifications using a modified SEQUEST algorithm. Anal Chem 74(21):5593–5599
Elias JE, Gygi SP (2007) Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat Methods 4(3):207–214
Käll L, Storey JD, MacCoss MJ et al (2007) Assigning significance to peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry using decoy databases. J Proteome Res 7(01):29–34
Spivak M, Weston J, Bottou L et al (2009) Improvements to the percolator algorithm for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics data sets. J Proteome Res 8(7):3737–3745
Cappadona S, Baker PR, Cutillas PR et al (2012) Current challenges in software solutions for mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics. Amino Acids 43(3):1087–1108
Chawade A, Alexandersson E, Levander F (2014) Normalyzer: a tool for rapid evaluation of normalization methods for omics datasets. J Proteome Res 13(6):3114–3120
Huber W, Von Heydebreck A, Sültmann H et al (2002) Variance stabilization applied to microarray data calibration and to the quantification of differential expression. Bioinformatics 18(Suppl 1):S96–S104
Karp NA, Huber W, Sadowski PG et al (2010) Addressing accuracy and precision issues in iTRAQ quantitation. Mol Cell Proteomics 9(9):1885–1897
Sandberg A, Branca RM, Lehtio J et al (2013) Quantitative accuracy in mass spectrometry based proteomics of complex samples: the impact of labeling and precursor interference. J Proteomics 96C:133–144. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2013.10.035
Savitski MM, Mathieson T, Zinn N et al (2013) Measuring and managing ratio compression for accurate iTRAQ/TMT quantification. J Proteome Res 12(8):3586–3598
Herbrich SM, Cole RN, West KP Jr et al (2013) Statistical inference from multiple iTRAQ experiments without using common reference standards. J Proteome Res 12(2):594–604
Ting L, Cowley MJ, Hoon SL et al (2009) Normalization and statistical analysis of quantitative proteomics data generated by metabolic labeling. Mol Cell Proteomics 8(10):2227–2242
Smyth GK (2004) Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 3(1):Article 3
Diz AP, Carvajal-Rodríguez A, Skibinski DO (2011) Multiple hypothesis testing in proteomics: a strategy for experimental work. Mol Cell Proteomics 10(3):M110.004374
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 57(1):289–300
Gillespie CS, Lei G, Boys RJ et al (2010) Analysing time course microarray data using Bioconductor: a case study using yeast2 Affymetrix arrays. BMC Res Notes 3(1):81
Ravasz E, Somera AL, Mongru DA et al (2002) Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science 297(5586):1551–1555
Gavin A-C, Aloy P, Grandi P et al (2006) Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440(7084):631–636
Titz B, Low T, Komisopoulou E et al (2010) The proximal signaling network of the BCR-ABL1 oncogene shows a modular organization. Oncogene 29(44):5895–5910
Martindale JL, Holbrook NJ (2002) Cellular response to oxidative stress: signaling for suicide and survival. J Cell Physiol 192(1):1–15. doi:10.1002/jcp.10119
Väremo L, Nielsen J, Nookaew I (2013) Enriching the gene set analysis of genome-wide data by incorporating directionality of gene expression and combining statistical hypotheses and methods. Nucleic Acids Res 41(8):4378–4391
Liberzon A, Subramanian A, Pinchback R et al (2011) Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0. Bioinformatics 27(12):1739–1740
Kanehisa M, Goto S, Sato Y et al (2014) Data, information, knowledge and principle: back to metabolism in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res 42(D1):D199–D205. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1076
Croft D, Mundo AF, Haw R et al (2014) The Reactome pathway knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 42(D1):D472–D477
Consortium GO (2013) Gene ontology annotations and resources. Nucleic Acids Res 41(D1):D530–D535
Culhane AC, Schröder MS, Sultana R et al (2012) GeneSigDB: a manually curated database and resource for analysis of gene expression signatures. Nucleic Acids Res 40(D1):D1060–D1066
Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA et al (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 25(1):25–29
Khatri P, Sirota M, Butte AJ (2012) Ten years of pathway analysis: current approaches and outstanding challenges. PLoS Comput Biol 8(2), e1002375. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002375
Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK et al (2005) Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(43):15545–15550
Da Wei Huang BTS, Lempicki RA (2008) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4(1):44–57
Merico D, Isserlin R, Stueker O et al (2010) Enrichment map: a network-based method for gene-set enrichment visualization and interpretation. PLoS One 5(11), e13984
Alexa A, Rahnenfuhrer J (2010) topGO: enrichment analysis for gene ontology. R package version 28
Ideker T, Ozier O, Schwikowski B et al (2002) Discovering regulatory and signalling circuits in molecular interaction networks. Bioinformatics 18(Suppl 1):S233–S240
Mitra K, Carvunis A-R, Ramesh SK et al (2013) Integrative approaches for finding modular structure in biological networks. Nat Rev Genet 14(10):719–732
Iorio F, Saez-Rodriguez J, Di Bernardo D (2013) Network based elucidation of drug response: from modulators to targets. BMC Syst Biol 7(1):139
Vidal M, Cusick ME, Barabasi A-L (2011) Interactome networks and human disease. Cell 144(6):986–998
Franceschini A, Szklarczyk D, Frankild S et al (2013) STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res 41(Database issue):D808–D815. doi:10.1093/nar/gks1094
Croft D, O'Kelly G, Wu G et al (2011) Reactome: a database of reactions, pathways and biological processes. Nucleic Acids Res 39(Database issue):D691–D697. doi:10.1093/nar/gkq1018
Wu G, Feng X, Stein L (2010) A human functional protein interaction network and its application to cancer data analysis. Genome Biol 11(5):R53. doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-5-r53
Calvano SE, Xiao W, Richards DR et al (2005) A network-based analysis of systemic inflammation in humans. Nature 437(7061):1032–1037
Racine J, Gerber V, Feutz MM et al (2011) Comparison of genomic and proteomic data in recurrent airway obstruction affected horses using ingenuity pathway analysis®. BMC Vet Res 7(1):48
Go Y-M, Roede JR, Orr M et al (2014) Integrated redox proteomics and metabolomics of mitochondria to identify mechanisms of Cd toxicity. Toxicol Sci 139(1):59–73
Hoeng J, Talikka M, Martin F et al (2013) Case study: the role of mechanistic network models in systems toxicology. Drug Discov Today 19(2):183–192
Schlage WK, Westra JW, Gebel S et al (2011) A computable cellular stress network model for non-diseased pulmonary and cardiovascular tissue. BMC Syst Biol 5(1):168
Gebel S, Lichtner RB, Frushour B et al (2013) Construction of a computable network model for DNA damage, autophagy, cell death, and senescence. Bioinform Biol Insights 7:97
Westra JW, Schlage WK, Frushour BP et al (2011) Construction of a computable cell proliferation network focused on non-diseased lung cells. BMC Syst Biol 5(1):105
Westra JW, Schlage WK, Hengstermann A et al (2013) A modular cell-type focused inflammatory process network model for non-diseased pulmonary tissue. Bioinform Biol Insights 7:167
Slater T (2014) Recent advances in modeling languages for pathway maps and computable biological networks. Drug Discov Today 19(2):193–198
Smoot ME, Ono K, Ruscheinski J et al (2011) Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics 27(3):431–432. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq675
Saito R, Smoot ME, Ono K et al (2012) A travel guide to cytoscape plugins. Nat Methods 9(11):1069–1076. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2212
Nepusz T, Yu H, Paccanaro A (2012) Detecting overlapping protein complexes in protein-protein interaction networks. Nat Methods 9(5):471–472
Maere S, Heymans K, Kuiper M (2005) BiNGO: a cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks. Bioinformatics 21(16):3448–3449. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti551
Leung MC, Rooney JP, Ryde IT et al (2013) Effects of early life exposure to ultraviolet C radiation on mitochondrial DNA content, transcription, ATP production, and oxygen consumption in developing Caenorhabditis elegans. BMC Pharm Toxicol 14(1):9
McRedmond JP, Park SD, Reilly DF et al (2004) Integration of proteomics and genomics in platelets: a profile of platelet proteins and platelet-specific genes. Mol Cell Proteomics 3(2):133–144. doi:10.1074/mcp.M300063-MCP200
Buschow SI, Lasonder E, van Deutekom HW et al (2010) Dominant processes during human dendritic cell maturation revealed by integration of proteome and transcriptome at the pathway level. J Proteome Res 9(4):1727–1737
Fisher RA (1925) Statistical methods for research workers. Genesis Publishing Pvt, Ltd, New Delhi
Stouffer SA, Suchman EA, DeVinney LC et al (1949) Studies in social psychology in world war II, vol 1. The American soldier: adjustment during army life. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, US
Kaever A, Landesfeind M, Feussner K et al (2014) Meta-analysis of pathway enrichment: combining independent and dependent omics data sets. PLoS One 9(2), e89297. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089297
Balbin OA, Prensner JR, Sahu A et al (2013) Reconstructing targetable pathways in lung cancer by integrating diverse omics data. Nat Commun 4:2617
Hood LE, Omenn GS, Moritz RL et al (2012) New and improved proteomics technologies for understanding complex biological systems: addressing a grand challenge in the life sciences. Proteomics 12(18):2773–2783
van Vliet E (2011) Current standing and future prospects for the technologies proposed to transform toxicity testing in the 21st century. ALTEX 28(1):17
Martin SF, Falkenberg H, Dyrlund TF et al (2013) PROTEINCHALLENGE: crowd sourcing in proteomics analysis and software development. J Proteomics 88:41–46
Roemer E, Schramke H, Weiler H et al (2012) Mainstream smoke chemistry and in vitro and in vivo toxicity of the reference cigarettes 3R4F and 2R4F. Contribute Tobacco Res 25:316–335
Deutsch EW, Mendoza L, Shteynberg D et al (2010) A guided tour of the Trans-Proteomic Pipeline. Proteomics 10(6):1150–1159
Rauch A, Bellew M, Eng J et al (2006) Computational proteomics analysis system (CPAS): an extensible, open-source analytic system for evaluating and publishing proteomic data and high throughput biological experiments. J Proteome Res 5(1):112–121
Cox J, Mann M (2008) MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized ppb-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol 26(12):1367–1372
Chen EY, Tan CM, Kou Y et al (2013) Enrichr: interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool. BMC Bioinformatics 14(1):128
Tarca AL, Draghici S, Khatri P et al (2009) A novel signaling pathway impact analysis. Bioinformatics 25(1):75–82
Martin F, Sewer A, Talikka M et al (2014) Quantification of biological network perturbations for mechanistic insight and diagnostics using two-layer causal models. BMC Bioinformatics 15(1):238. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-15-238
Dittrich MT, Klau GW, Rosenwald A et al (2008) Identifying functional modules in protein-protein interaction networks: an integrated exact approach. Bioinformatics 24(13):i223–i231. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn161
Beisser D, Klau GW, Dandekar T et al (2010) BioNet: an R-Package for the functional analysis of biological networks. Bioinformatics 26(8):1129–1130
Aluru M, Zola J, Nettleton D et al (2013) Reverse engineering and analysis of large genome-scale gene networks. Nucleic Acids Res 41(1):e24
Komurov K, Dursun S, Erdin S et al (2012) NetWalker: a contextual network analysis tool for functional genomics. BMC Genomics 13(1):282
Komurov K, White MA, Ram PT (2010) Use of data-biased random walks on graphs for the retrieval of context-specific networks from genomic data. PLoS Comput Biol 6(8), e1000889
Petrochilos D, Shojaie A, Gennari J et al (2013) Using random walks to identify cancer-associated modules in expression data. BioData Min 6(1):17
Ulitsky I, Krishnamurthy A, Karp RM et al (2010) DEGAS: de novo discovery of dysregulated pathways in human diseases. PLoS One 5(10), e13367
McClellan EA, Moerland PD, van der Spek PJ et al (2013) NetWeAvers: an R package for integrative biological network analysis with mass spectrometry data. Bioinformatics 29(22):2946–2947. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt513
Saha A, Tan AC, Kang J (2014) Automatic context-specific subnetwork discovery from large interaction networks. PLoS One 9(1), e84227
Eddy JA, Hood L, Price ND et al (2010) Identifying tightly regulated and variably expressed networks by differential rank conservation (DIRAC). PLoS Comput Biol 6(5), e1000792
Acknowledgment
The research described in this chapter of the book was funded by Philip Morris International.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Titz, B. et al. (2015). Analysis of Proteomic Data for Toxicological Applications. In: Hoeng, J., Peitsch, M. (eds) Computational Systems Toxicology. Methods in Pharmacology and Toxicology. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2778-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2778-4_11
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2777-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2778-4
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols